Serial Killers, A pattern???

[DVV]

David,

I think so. Im not a very regulary reader of the bible.

"Male and female He created them"
Corey, III, 26.

You 2 seem to be on sleight binge lately, thats a shame.

The thread which seems to be of utmost importance to you corey allows for discussion on both sides of your question, so please refrain from trying to suppress those ideas...these are best kept as open discussions.

Ive made my opinion clear, as have others, so...any contrary theories are hardly "Mikes", or from one of "Mikes" pals. Im inspired by some others as perhaps they might be from me at times, but no-one's claiming anything as their own.

Ive suggested less dramatic scenarios than your blood creature of Spitalfield, and myself and others have offered quotations and other such information that substantiates that Fenians were thought to have been involved with the crimes in some capacity long before any serial killer suicidal barristers theories surfaced. By the highest authorities involved with the investigations. We have cited sources and comments that are explicit and are clearly intelligible.

What, aside from yours or contemporary opinion, is the foundation data that defines these crimes as serial, and as having been committed by a single killer.

There is a requirement here in this kind of dialogue that to dismiss a contrary opinion to yours all you need is a contrary opinion, but to prove someone incorrect and to authenticate your own theory requires data far more substantive and impartial than the same old opinion.

Opinions are like a*******, we all have one. What makes one better or more worthy of serious consideration is how much better the rubber meets the road...some support for the theory needs to be found or suggested within the known physical and circumstantial data.

I say the only basis for your serial killer theory can be found in opinions. If you feel you can make that case and prove me wrong....more cohesively than to date....Id be interested in reading it.

There is a fine line between a genius and a fool at times....only a fool rejects what is provably so.

Best regards

[corey123]

David,

I think so. Im not a very regulary reader of the bible.

[DVV]

And just call me Corey.

Yeah...
Corey ?
Is it in theBible ?

[corey123]

Yes I did know a girl who played it, not professional, but played it. This was way back though.

And just call me Corey.

[DVV]

Are you telling me that you've dated a girl who played rugby in America ??

Now, in your country, it's hard to find a man that knows rugby - let alone to play it.
And you...are my pitchounette back.

[corey123]

david,

I dated a girl who played rugby for a short while, her name was Hannah and I never really understod why she played it either. HA ha ha.

yours truly

[DVV]

Corey,
rugby has been much for me.
The only regret in my life is to have stopped it at 26yo.
How I miss these times, especially in Provence where it is...
Extreme!
...and there we're back to Mike.

[corey123]

David,

Wow thats a first,
never met anyone who hates football.

Im not much a fan of English football(soccer)

I have a friend who plays rugby, Micah his name is.

Never understood why he likes it. I only went to see him play once and I was very confused.

[DVV]

Moun pitchoun,

I hate football.
Be it American or English.
I'm born in rugby.

God bless Webb Ellis.
Really.

[corey123]

David,

Ha ha. Do you watch football(again american)?

yours truly.

p.s It says you PM inbox is full.
And we are still loosing the poll.

[DVV]

Ok.
But admit it was fun.
To the extreme.
Like some (Canadian) theories.

With Canada, I can't be off-topic.

[corey123]

david,

Believe what you want but trust me when I say your "Latin psychology" is wrong. Dunno why I would need to lie about my gender.

Anyways this is really off topic of the thread.

[DVV]

Then my latin psychology tells me you're a woman.

[corey123]

For which one I like better?

I havent really ever watched rugby so I would have to pick CRIMINAL psychology.

Not just plain psychology.