Serial Killers, A pattern???

[lynn cates]

bloody forensics

Hello Corey. Well, if Liz was soliciting, it is usually thought that she did so near the gates. OK. If Jack met her there, we need a forensics reconstruction to show how they wound up 10 feet away, Liz on her side, with cachous between her left thumb and forefinger, and none spilled.

The speculation is that her assailant was just behind her and to one side. He pulled her from behind by her scarf and cut her throat as she fell. Now, given her body position, she was exiting the yard.

You will notice that some of these elements CANNOT go together.

The best.
LC

[corey123]

I do Ha

Please state these logicist problems so I may answer them???

yours truly

[lynn cates]

1:00 Am

Hello Corey. Fair enough. Diemschutz arrived at about 1:00 AM. So you might need to push the entire time line up a bit. I presume you also have Jack hiding up the yard in order to obviate some of the other logistic problems.

The best.
LC

[corey123]

Hey lynn

Im just stating that he probally calculated the time AFTER he ran, why look at the clock befor he ran?? But as to who interupted him I do belive it to be Diemschutz. I belive he "Blizt" styled her(I would have never thought of it if you hadnt introduced a pouncer ripper) and wated for her to bleed out, but befor he could begin the mutilation he was interupted.

yours truly

[lynn cates]

logistics

Hello Corey. I see you and your friend have worked hard on this. That's good.

I wonder about some of the logistics in Stride's killing? The main problem may be that the time 12:35-12:40 quite likely had some club members in the yard, members who subsequently reported an empty yard.

Another problem may be this. If his "blitz" of Liz was that early, then it is not quite clear who interrupted him. Any candidates?

The best.
LC

[corey123]

This thread is my overall result of work. I have used a basic theory based on a connection in behavior and found a new avenue in ripperology. My theory gos against most of what is thought to be the ripper, but I truly believe it. I give credit to a fantastic indavidual who helped me with this theory, Mklhawley, an earth science, astronomy, and chemistry teacher. Using the scientific behavior I had found, I have found a conclusion.

My conclusion is as it is.

First of all for those who havent seen my victim theory, here it is:

My opinion is the first victem taken by "Jack The Ripper" is Martha Tabram. I belive the reason for a different M.O is becaue a killer,like all humans, learns with experience. I belive he killed her with a different style(which did not satisfy him) but with the same intentions, mutilation of the victem. She was stabbed 39 times if I am correct and that, to me, is a fair way to mutilates someone in my opinion.

The second, Polly ,was murdered by him as well. He tried a new method of killing which DID statisfy him, also with the same intentions. As the same with annie.

With Stride, I do belive she was a victem, I belive that what schwartz saw may have been a misinterpretation as something else. I note that he was scared, scared enough to flee, so he probally was panicing and may have not seen what had actually prospired and saw someone totally different. I may be wrong. he saw that at 12:45 and her body was found at !:00 which gives us 15 minutes, and schwartz probally calculated the time to after he fled so we I belive a more probable time to be at 12:35-12:40. Withing that time liz walks into dutsfeild yard. upon leaving I belive the ripper tried yet another method, using partially the same M.O. but not approaching the victem, rather "blitz" styling her. This didnt satisfy him and he was interupted and fled down the ally.

With Kate I belive he still held the urge to mutilate so her found her, applying the same tactics for the second and third victem.

For the last Kelly, I belive the reason for the killing was inside was infact due to circumstances not that he choose to do it but maybe was again experimenting. also taking his mutilating to a new level.

Now moving on, I believe Jack the Ripper was one of the many serial killers suffering from the mental disorder of Narcissim, a form of aggressive personality disorder. A person diagnosed with Narcissism experiances a multitude of traits.
Manifesting within them are aggression, paranoia, borderline characteristics, envy, greed, power lust, lack of empathy, they view others as "playthings" to be used then discarded.
Narcissim is caused by severe mental or physical pain in childhood at the hands of a powerful, Idealized mother/father figure.
Those with Narcissism believe they have the right to manipulate, exploit, and be unnaturally cruel to others.

Narcissim was'nt defined until the late 80's. It is an impulsive behavior. Those suffer from uncontrolable behavior like rage. Side effects of Narcissism range from OCD(obsessive compulsive disorder), pathalogical lying, and paranoiac dimensions.

Those with Narcissim can also suffer from Borderline syndrom, Paranoid schitzophrenia, and OCD.
There are few signals and waring signs to a psychological break, in which anger is pent up and may be triggered by a sudden change in their environment or life. I believe Jack the Ripper to be the victim of a psychological episode.

I belive he is a sexual sadist killer.
His primary intention in his killings, MUTILATION!!
His prefered M.O is the approach, manipulation of the victim, taking them(or maybe even them leading him) to a spot deemed secure enough for the take out, in which he cuts the throat and engages in mutilation.

I have found similar behavioral patterns in the zodiac killings, with the M.O and weapon choice.

Heres my view(or theory) of the events leading to his killing spree.

Jack the Ripper probally had a absent father, but a controling and dominant mother. I belive his mother put him through sever mental pain, she bacame a prostitute and her attention was diverted away from him, thus he become emotionally troubled and detatched. Having no way to release these pent up emotions, he set small fires and killed small animals, and found a level of dominance of his own and enjoyed it. In later adulthood he would work alone, experiancing tremors of rage which held him from society. He had a low openness so he had a difficult time adapting to social or personal change, which happened, sparking his murderous tendencys. I however do not know this sudden change. He hated woman, all of them, in each prostitute he saw his mother in them, ignoring him, abbusing him. Thus creating a immense disgust for woman prostitutes. This change also sparked anxiety, tension,and irritability, which is his primary motive.

So he killed.
Like I say in previous theorys he killed at first to release all that pent-up emotion, because of his state of alexithymia, or not being able to express his emotions, but found he enjoyed his work. He took pride in his work, taking trophies from his victims, dehumanizing and defemanizing them. He probally even stood in the crowds attracked by his kills.
I dont point to any suspect in this theory, nor say he stopped killing with Kelly, these things, I believe may never be known.


This is the start of a new outlook on the case for me.

Please, tell me what you think of it.

yours truly