JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year

[FISHY1118]

Let's put this away once and for all (hopefully). The Dallas Police Dept preserved the print by removing it from the rifle using adhesive tape, and the FBI did not initially realise that this had happened. This was subsequently accepted by the FBI.

Ooops, I'm repeating .....

Great, now just show us where the FBI accepted that in an official memo or document or statement?

[Herlock Sholmes]

Howard Brennan's description of the man did not match Oswald.

He described a man about eight years older and wearing different coloured clothing.

How did he describe different coloured clothing?

[FISHY1118]

Youve made 6 posts now. Posting a couple of examples would have taken one minute but you can’t. As an alternative you expect me to trawl back through 2000 posts. Yeah right.

Point proven….no evidence given….I can move on.

Move on all you like , my post covered everything your got to say on the matter .

[Herlock Sholmes]

It’s amazing how many blatantly useless, fantasists that CT’s offer up as witnesses, they nitpick to ridiculous degrees on proper witnesses. Woe betide any witnesses who gives a person the wrong colour shoes. No matter that he identifies the guys face.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Howard Brennan's description of the man did not match Oswald.

He described a man about eight years older and wearing different coloured clothing.

Rubbish. No one can tell anyone’s age to that degree of accuracy.

[Fiver]

Howard Brennan's description of the man did not match Oswald.

He described a man about eight years older and wearing different coloured clothing.

Oswald was 5'9, slender build, 26 years old. Brennan gave an accurate description.

"He was a white man in his early 30’s, slender, nice looking, slender and would weight about 165 to 175 pounds. He had on light colored clothing but definitely not a suit." - Howard Brennan

The police report given based in Brennan's description was "White male, approximately thirty, slender build, height five feet ten inches, 165 pounds."

Officer Tippett asked the dispatcher to repeat that description just before he stopped Oswald.

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

Howard Brennan's description of the man did not match Oswald.

He described a man about eight years older and wearing different coloured clothing.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Here’s question for all of us.

Was Howard Brennan part of a conspiracy to frame Oswald?

Or was he just amazingly lucky?

Of all of the buildings in DP he picked the correct one.

He picked the correct window on the correct floor.

He luckily invented a description of a man that just happened to match Oswald (not a man with a beard, or a fat man, or a black man, or a man wearing glasses)


And luckily for him his lie wasn’t exposed by being proved wrong.

What a lucky chap.

[Herlock Sholmes]

According to sworn affidavits, and radio and television reports, it was a Mauser.

(PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1)


Stop believing the lies CT websites tell you.

(Fiver)



Anyone can view online the original affidavit signed by Seymour Weitzman, describing the rifle as a 7.65 Mauser, and the television reports announcing the same, and hear the radio reports giving the same information.

That is the truth.

What you have written is completely and demonstrably untrue.

But only Craig said that he saw the stamp on the rifle. Weitzman and Boone simply saw a rifle that looked like a Mauser and agreed. And they both admitted their error.

And we know for an absolute fact what a liar and a fantasist Craig was. A book could be written called The Demonstrable Fantasies and Lies of Roger Craig.

[Herlock Sholmes]

One question I’ve often considered though is - could shell cartridges really have been heard hitting the floor from a position on the 5th?
WC lawyers Ball and Bellin had exactly the same question so they tested it. Bellin wrote: “I really did not expect to hear anything. Then, with remarkable clarity, I could hear the thump as a cartridge case hit the floor. There were two more thumps as the two other cartridge cases hit the floor above me.” He also heard the Secret Service agent with the rifle move:”..the bolt of the rifle back and forth - and this too could be heard with clarity.”

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

According to sworn affidavits, and radio and television reports, it was a Mauser.

(PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1)


Stop believing the lies CT websites tell you.

(Fiver)



Anyone can view online the original affidavit signed by Seymour Weitzman, describing the rifle as a 7.65 Mauser, and the television reports announcing the same, and hear the radio reports giving the same information.

That is the truth.

What you have written is completely and demonstrably untrue.

[Herlock Sholmes]

I’m not interested in anything you say.

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

We are questioning your accuracy, not your integrity.

My integrity has been questioned - and that very word used.

[Fiver]

I repeat my suggestion that anyone who doubts my integrity, which is constantly being questioned, read Weitzman's affidavit.

We are questioning your accuracy, not your integrity.

[Fiver]

According to sworn affifavits, and radio and television reports, it was a Mauser.

Stop believing the lies CT websites tell you.

Discovery of the rifle was shown on film by a local news cameraman. It was a Caracano.

The evidence that two of the three produced in evidence have no proven connection to the ones found has been presented on this thread.

Stop believing the lies CT websites tell you.

We have a complete chain of custody on all three shell casings. Four different ballistics experts concluded that the shell casings came from Oswald's rifle.

I already have - on this thread.

Feel free to explain how Oswald's prints could have been planted on the rifle, boxes, and paper bag.

There is no proof that the print was genuinely lifted from the rifle.

Stop believing the lies CT websites tell you.

Lt Carl Day of the DPD lifted a palm print off Oswald's Carcano. Several other DPD officers saw the lifted print before it was sent to forensics. The adhesive material bearing the print bore impressions of the same irregularities that appeared on the barrel of the rifle. The print was confirmed to be Oswald's by experts from the NYPD and the FBI.

A finger and palm print were found on the paper bag. The prints were confirmed to be Oswald's by experts from the NYPD and the FBI.

Lt Carl Day of the DPD lifted a palm print off one of the bixes in the sniper's nest. The FBI found a finger and palm print were found on the boxes used to form the sniper's nest.

The FBI found fibers on Oswald's Carcano that matched the shirt he was wearing that day.

The FBI found fibers inside the paper bag that matched the blanket Oswald kept his gun wrapped in.

According to Howard Brennan's affidavit, the alleged shooter was about eight years older than Oswald and wore different coloured clothing.


That's not what Brennan said.


That is what he said and everything you have quoted confirms that what I wrote is correct.

Everything I quoted shows what Brennan actually said, not what you interpret him as saying.

"He was a white man in his early 30’s, slender, nice looking, slender and would weight about 165 to 175 pounds. He had on light colored clothing but definitely not a suit." - Howard Brennan

The police report given based in Brennan's description was "White male, approximately thirty, slender build, height five feet ten inches, 165 pounds."

Oswald was 5'9, slender build, 26 years old. Brennan gave an accurate description.

Five people did not even turn up that day and many who were outside were not allowed back inside the building following the assassination.

So you have no evidence that anyone except Oswald was at the Book Depository when the shooting occurred, then left afterwards.

And you're wrong about many employees who were outside not being let back into the building. The only one who wasn't let back in was Charles Givens and he was still nearby roughly an hour after the shooting. He also had an alibi. When Givens tried to enter the building a second time, the police asked him to give a statement.

So who the five Book Depository employees that you claim didn't come in to work that day?