JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year

[FISHY1118]

JFK revisited, "Through the looking glass"

You might like this one George, for me it puts an end to any doubt what we known all along. That LHO did not kill Kennedy and that he was shot from the front.

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

No one is claiming that is what happened. Please stop misrepresenting the position of people who disagree with you.

I am quite sure that I did not misrepresent anything.

I refer you to the question I posed in # 2656:


Where is the evidence that that bullet entered the base of the back of Kennedy's neck?

[Fiver]

I am glad you mentioned the laws of physics because I would like to know how a bullet entering a person's upper back, about six inches below the neckline, at a downwards angle, could then go on to exit the front of his throat.

No one is claiming that is what happened. Please stop misrepresenting the position of people who disagree with you.

[GBinOz]

There is plenty of evidence as to where that wound was located, including eyewitness evidence and the official autopsy diagrams.

Where is the evidence that that bullet entered the base of the back of Kennedy's neck?

There is no evidence that bullet entered the base of the back of Kennedy's neck. The actual evidence was adjusted to accommodate the single bullet theory.

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

The final report said: "A bullet had entered the base of the back of his neck slightly to the right of his spine."

There is plenty of evidence as to where that wound was located, including eyewitness evidence and the official autopsy diagrams.

Where is the evidence that that bullet entered the base of the back of Kennedy's neck?

[GBinOz]

I am glad you mentioned the laws of physics because I would like to know how a bullet entering a person's upper back, about six inches below the neckline, at a downwards angle, could then go on to exit the front of his throat.

As a member of the Warren Commission that investigated the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Gerald R. Ford suggested that the panel change its initial description of the bullet wound in Kennedy's back to place it higher up in his body.

Ford's handwritten editing, revealed in papers kept by the commission's general counsel, was accepted with a slight change.

The initial draft of the report stated: "A bullet had entered his {Kennedy's} back at a point slightly below the shoulder to the right of the spine."

Ford wanted it to read: "A bullet had entered the back of his neck slightly to the right of the spine."

The final report said: "A bullet had entered the base of the back of his neck slightly to the right of his spine."

Ford said that the change was intended to clarify meaning, not alter history.

Apparently, the truth can be "adjusted".

Cheers, George

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

You also dismiss most or all of the physical evidence and in many cases the laws of physics.

I am glad you mentioned the laws of physics because I would like to know how a bullet entering a person's upper back, about six inches below the neckline, at a downwards angle, could then go on to exit the front of his throat.

[Admin]

We have decided to re-open this thread. Posters are advised that as this is NOT a JTR thread, the value that it adds to the boards overall is minimal. The prohibition on Personal Attacks is going to be EMPHATICALLY enforced. Should you violate it, you will not only receive an immediate suspension from posting from Casebook entirely, you will be prohibited from ANY further discussion on the JFK thread. This is a one, and you're done, situation.

[cobalt]

Placing a gunman in an area where police officers parked their cars might seem a foolish thing to do on first sight. But on reflection it may be an indication of some rather smart thinking.
Do we know if all the cars in that area were accounted for and fully searched by police after the shots?

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

"And I asked him where it was located. I asked him, 'was it below the Adam's apple?' And he said, yes it was in the midline, in the front of the neck, below the Adam's apple. And he said three times that it was an entrance wound from the front."

(journalist Connie Kritzberg, recalling her telephone interview of doctor Malcolm Perry about two hours after the assassination, in which she asked him about the president's throat wound).

That is what doctor Malcolm Perry really thought until Warren Commission counsel got to work on him.

[Fiver]

For the sake of the tHread ill try and keep my responses to just a few lines, the long drawn out ones frankly bore the hell out of me .

You have a problem reading Herlock's less than a page post.

And no problem with GB's nearly three hours of garbage videos that he linked.

Your double standard is noted.

[Fiver]

Were back on the ''everyone lied , were mistaken , were complete idiots , or never existed'' train again i see .

Yes folks all 100 or so of them, what are the chances of that !!!!!

Back on? That has always been the position you and other conspiracy theorists - everyone but Oswald was lying - his wife, his coworkers, the Dallas police, the doctors, the FBI, the CIA, the Post Office, the Warren Commission, and all those civilian witnesses with no ties to any of those groups. You also dismiss most or all of the physical evidence and in many cases the laws of physics.

[FISHY1118]

Were back on the ''everyone lied , were mistaken , were complete idiots , or never existed'' train again i see .

Yes folks all 100 or so of them, what are the chances of that !!!!!

[FISHY1118]

Hi Fishy, and other fellow conspiracy nuts,

There is some interesting conjecture on the throat shot here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpFHYwot6bk&ab_channel=JFK63Conspiracy

On the theme that the throat shot came from the front, through the windscreen, from the vicinity of the south knoll, there is some interesting facts on the "pickup man" in the Cancellare photo who fails to be seen in the Zapruder film, starting at about the 25 min mark:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCigDMyHisE&ab_channel=BradVeilleux

Some more on the Cancellare film here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXwObEPcuRk&ab_channel=TheJFKAssassination Audit



Question to be answered: For what reason would anyone take the trouble to edit the pickup man out of the ZP?

Finally, this video is a bit longer but is chock full of interesting information:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAhFP0gnItM&t=10s&ab_channel=touchezUK

Cheers, George

Hi George just fininshed the video '' The Great Zupruder film hoax . Brilliant find mate, this really is the starting point where the W.C findings come tumbling down . When you have multiple witnesses testifying to the contrary of what they saw and heard on the day ,its shameful the WC went to such lengths to conceal the truth.

[FISHY1118]

Same old Herlock post [ long , pointless and repetative ] , nothing to see here folks, only the fact that you have and will always dismiss and mock evidence to that which you cant explain .

Which is all that contradicts the WC fantasy .

For the sake of the tHread ill try and keep my responses to just a few lines, the long drawn out ones frankly bore the hell out of me .