Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fiver
    replied
    Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
    If not, then its remarkable he wouldnt have fired the first shot when the Presidential Limousine first straighten up onto Houston st .I make it around 60 to 65 metere in a clear straight line of fire with nowhere for the limo to maneuver.
    Firing at JFK from the front would have been a great way to let every person in the motorcade see him firing at JFK. Which means instead of spending time figuring out where the shots were coming from, the Secret Service would know and be able to take more effective actions, including returning fire on the assassin,

    Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
    Also the turn into Elm st on that corner at a very low speed at the closest point to the TSBD would have made for an easy kill even for a poor marksman .
    That would require leaning out he window, which would give the assassin's position away to everyone behind the Presidential limo in the motorcade. It would also mean the assassin giving up a braced position, which would greatly reduce accuracy.


    Leave a comment:


  • PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1
    replied
    Originally posted by Fiver View Post

    You have repeatedly ignored facts and misrepresented evidence.

    Brennan got the shirt color wrong, but you act as if Oswald was identified by the color of his shirt.

    And you deliberately, repeatedly ignore the evidence of Brennan's description of Oswald.

    Oswald was 5'9, slender build, 24 years old.

    "He was a white man in his early 30’s, slender, nice looking, slender and would weight about 165 to 175 pounds. He had on light colored clothing but definitely not a suit." - Howard Brennan

    Readers may find it strange that having got the colour of Oswald's shirt wrong and his age wrong, and overestimated his weight by nearly three stone, Brennan's description of the man as 'nice looking, slender' points to Oswald.

    Leave a comment:


  • PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1
    replied

    Wade did not say that the rifle was a Mauser

    (Fiver)



    It's a Mauser, I believe

    (District Attorney Henry Wade)​

    Leave a comment:


  • PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1
    replied
    Originally posted by Fiver View Post

    JFK was not propelled forwards or backwards by the bullet to his neck.

    That's the way reality works - bullets only propel people around in Hollywood.

    JFK never received a bullet to the back of his neck.

    He received a shot that hit him about six inches below his neckline, as confirmed by eyewitness testimony, FBI reports of the autopsy, FBI measurements of the bullet holes in the President's clothing, and the autopsy diagrams.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fiver
    replied
    Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post
    According to the Warren Commission Report and its supporters here, President Kennedy was shot in the back of the neck.

    Why was he not propelled backwards by that shot?
    JFK was not propelled forwards or backwards by the bullet to his neck.

    That's the way reality works - bullets only propel people around in Hollywood.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X