JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Patrick Differ
    replied
    Warren Commission XXII:CE 1205..Dallas Sheriff on Ruby and prostitution

    ABC News 2003 interview with Robert Blakey..discusses Oswald as a Mob Hit and also relationship with Carlos Marcello

    HSCA Volume VIII. Demolished WC rigged Jack Ruby polygraph

    Burt Griffin and Leon Hubert were tasked to investigate Ruby for the WC. They stated that both Oswald and Ruby had ties to Cuban activities and Rubyvto the point of both gun sales and smuggling. Leads that neither WC nor HSCA followed up.

    But others have and are.

    Leave a comment:


  • Patrick Differ
    replied
    Fiver this is all public domain HSCA and WC stuff. It's well cataloged in Chokeholds..Jim DiEugenio, Paul Bleau, Matt Crumpton , Andrew Iler and Mark Adamczyk...all recognized authorities on the subject.

    Some people just want to know if it's government killed one of its Leaders and possibly 2 others. So if you believe the government of that time, good for you. I'm not sure why anyone would want to defend the WC or HSCA. Neither used any Standard of Proof as I mentioned before. That means the assassination was never thoroughly investigated.

    Cant wait to hear how these experts are discredited.

    Leave a comment:


  • cobalt
    replied
    Yet despite being seen as a burden Robert Oswald never shot at the POTUS. So why did Lee?

    Leave a comment:


  • Fiver
    replied
    Originally posted by cobalt View Post
    Interesting to see Robert Oswald quoted as a reliable source from Fiver who in his previous post said that the Oswald household was 'toxic' due to an uninterested/overindulgent mother.
    Robert Oswald was cited to debunk the claim that "One common impression is that those who interacted with Oswald found it impossible to believe that he would be capable of assassinating the US president."

    When asked how their mother had done raising Lee, Robert Oswald said "If we go and get right down to the bottom line, we have to say, really and truly, in all candor, [she did] a lousy job, a lousy job."

    Robert also said "I don’t know at what age Mother verbalized the effect that she felt he was a burden to her. But she certainly conveyed it to John and I at very early ages. We’re talking seven, eight, nine, 10 years old. At what age Lee started gathering this, or sensing it, or hearing it and applying it to him, I don’t know. But certainly by age three, he had the sense, “I need to be someplace else.” Mother would be putting him with a nanny, or a babysitter, or in an orphan home with us, just to get us out of her hair. We were a burden."

    Leave a comment:


  • Fiver
    replied
    Originally posted by Patrick Differ View Post
    The FBI and CIA both had files on Oswald and Ruby before the assassination.
    Feel free to provide evidence that the FBI and CIA had files on Ruby.

    Originally posted by Patrick Differ View Post
    If people can recall Oswald on New Orleans TV handing out Leaflets for FPCC, that was a proven CIA counter intelligence operation.
    If it's proven then you should have no problem providing proof that Oswald was part of a CIA counter intelligence operation in New Orleans.

    Originally posted by Patrick Differ View Post
    Ruby was a known low level Mafia owned flunky who ran guns and prostitution for Marcello.
    If it's known, you should gave no problem proving Ruby worked for the Mafia. Unless a dozen witnesses are lying, Ruby wasn't running prostitution for anyone. There's only one dubious claim that Ruby was involved in gun running. And Ruby's shaky financial position argues against him being a successful criminal.

    Originally posted by Patrick Differ View Post
    It will come out.
    No competent Conspiracy would have left records in the first place. And even a mostly incompetent Conspiracy has had 60 years to destroy the evidence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fiver
    replied
    Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
    Do you think that someone might have noticed Oswald carrying in this parcel that morning?

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Bag-2.jpg Views:	117 Size:	47.9 KB ID:	851711
    Note the snug fit between the cupped hand and the armpit.
    Mr. FRAZIER - Well, I say, you know like I say, I didn't pay much attention to the package other than I knew he had it under his arm and I didn't pay too much attention the way he was walking because I was walking along there looking at the railroad cars and watching the men on the diesel switch them cars and I didn't pay too much attention on how he carried the package at all.

    Mr. BALL - Did you ever see Lee Oswald carry any sort of large package?
    Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, I didn't, but some of the fellows said they did.
    Mr. BALL - Who said that?
    Mr. DOUGHERTY - Well, Bill Shelley, he told me that he thought he saw him carrying a fairly good-sized package.​

    Leave a comment:


  • Fiver
    replied
    Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
    The cleaning company, Acme Building & Maintenance, would have come into the building after hours, so no one would have thought some one in the building after hours was unusual.
    Other members of the Acme Building and maintenance Company would have thought that it was unusual if some besides themselves was in the TSBD after hours. So would members of the Smith Detective Agency and Nightwatch Service, whose were supposed to periodically check the building at night.

    That doesn't preclude someone entering the TSBD undetected after hours. But how does this person and their rifle remain undetected after people start showing up to work in the TSBD? Staying overnight is adding pointless additional risk to an already risky plan.



    Leave a comment:


  • Fiver
    replied
    Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
    Sherry Fiester refers to something similar to the jet effect, but calls it back spatter.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_VpUbJQuRc&rco=1&ab_channel=SouthKnollInv estigations
    We get barely more than a minute in before the video claims that most witnesses agreed that three or more shots were heard.

    That's true, but it would be even more true to say most witnesses agreed that three or less shots were heard.

    A tabulation shows
    2% heard 1 shot.
    12% heard 2 shots.
    81% heard 3 shots.
    5% heard 4 or more shots.

    The video is deliberately being deceptive.​​

    Leave a comment:


  • Fiver
    replied
    Originally posted by GBinOz View Post

    Hi Fishy,

    I found a couple of videos that may be of interest to you. They debunk the "jet effect" and the "Neuromuscular reaction" theories.



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE0T...he%F0%9F%A6%8B
    "Gary L. Aguilar is an ophthalmologist specializing in plastic and reconstructive surgery". He is not an expert on physics or ballistics.

    As to the man Aguilar supposedly debunks, Luis Alvarez, here's what Alvarez said about the jet effect.

    Or for something less dry, Penn and Teller demonstrate the jet effect.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by Patrick Differ View Post
    There was no evidence Oswald met with Kostikov. Hoover did not believe Oswald was actually there based on video and voice surveillance of the Embassy in Mexico.

    The Gale memorandum was the FBI playing the blame game. Seems odd since Oswald was an FBI informant according to Hoover. Taking blame after the fact eventhough they knew all about Oswald.
    Could you show us the proof that Hoover said that Oswald was an informant. I’ve seen reports that Hoover was concerned that Oswald had been used by agents as an informant but none of this has been validated as far as I’m aware. Rumour doesn’t count of course.

    Leave a comment:


  • Patrick Differ
    replied
    There was no evidence Oswald met with Kostikov. Hoover did not believe Oswald was actually there based on video and voice surveillance of the Embassy in Mexico.

    The Gale memorandum was the FBI playing the blame game. Seems odd since Oswald was an FBI informant according to Hoover. Taking blame after the fact eventhough they knew all about Oswald.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fiver
    replied
    Originally posted by cobalt View Post
    I haven't found a link to Kostikov confirming that he met Oswald. ?
    There's this report. And Oswald's typed letter. And the handwritten copy of the letter.



    Leave a comment:


  • Patrick Differ
    replied
    Ruby knew Trafficante from his days in Chicago. He visited Trafficante in Tresconia Prison in 1959 where Castro had locked him up. Ruby also shipped guns to Lewis McWillie who was Trafficante's former Manager of the Tropicana in Havana. The HSCA concluded Ruby was a MOB courier.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by Patrick Differ View Post
    Carlos Marcello controlled gambling and prostitution in Dallas.To think Ruby wasn't affiliated with the MOB, on some level, is absurd There is no way that Ruby could have run any of this without giving the MOB their cut. None.
    That would mean that every shopkeeper who paid protection money was ‘affiliated’ to the Mob. And every member of the Teamsters Union were ‘affiliated’ to the Mob. Everyone that paid money back to a loan shark was ‘affiliated’ to the Mob. Ruby was a nightclub owner in the 60’s. Of course he’s going to mix with mobsters and crooks in some way. It doesn’t make him Al Capone though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Patrick Differ
    replied
    Carlos Marcello controlled gambling and prostitution in Dallas.To think Ruby wasn't affiliated with the MOB, on some level, is absurd There is no way that Ruby could have run any of this without giving the MOB their cut. None.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X