From Mitre Square to Goulston Street - Some thoughts.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rjpalmer
    replied
    Originally posted by Darryl Kenyon View Post

    Severin Klosowski [ George Chapman ], was born in Nagornak Poland. He studied Yiddish . He murdered three women what we know of.
    Hi Darryl.

    "Unsurprisingly, the Jewish community felt stigmatized at being associated with a serial murderer. The Rev. Frank L. Cohen of Brixton Prison reassured readers of the Jewish Chronicle that Chapman was definitely a Gentile."

    --Helen Wojtczak, Jack the Ripper at Last? p. 164

    While some in the British press had identified 'Chapman' as a Jew, Klosowski was evidently a Roman Catholic...

    Leave a comment:


  • Fiver
    replied
    Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post
    It was well-known that violent homes were almost unheard of in the Jewish community in Whitechapel.
    We have no idea what sort of home Kosminski came from - violent or loving, religious or secular.

    Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post
    There is no evidence that Kosminski was in trouble for anything more serious than walking a dog without a muzzle.

    There is no evidence even that he was ever of interest to the police prior to his incarceration.
    There was no evidence that Michael Platt and William Matix were ever of interest to police until they were pulled over in a stolen vehicle on April 11, 1986. They were responsible for multiple armed robberies, murder and attempted murder and before the bullets stopped, they would kill two FBI agents and wound several more.

    Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post
    The whole case against him is non-existent.
    The case against him is that a couple police had him as a suspect. We don't know why, but we can't just put it down to anti-semitism - there were plenty of other Jewish men suspected.

    The case in Kosminski's favor is that:
    * He was so obviously insane and the nature of his insanity made it unlikely he could have approached any of the victims and got them to let their guard down.
    * He was repeatedly noted as non-violent while institutionalized.
    * He wasn't institutionalized until a couple years after the Ripper killings ended.
    * Most of the information about him does not match the Kosminski of the McNaughton Memorandum or Swanson Marginalia.

    I doubt that Aaron Kosminski is the Kosminski referred to by McNaughton and Swanson. I consider him an very unlikely Ripper suspect.

    But his Jewishness has nothing to do with his guilt or innocence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Originally posted by Darryl Kenyon View Post

    Yes it was crass stupidity as Anderson says to erase the writing. It was and is a possible clue. But my own view is we should treat it with caution.

    Regards Darryl
    This really does sum it up well, I'd say. There was a movement in the eighties and nineties amongst Ripperologists to go minimalist in their thinking, and in the process they threw out the baby with the bath water. The GSG, Stride, the items found next to the victims, the Ripper's alleged skill with a knife - all of it was chucked out of the tram because it was inconvenient. This was (and is) a pet peeve of mine and served as the backbone for the research in my two books. Another peeve of mine is when we go in the opposite direction and weave complicated theories built on maybes and what-ifs. Somewhere between the empty pram and everything-including-the-kitchen-sink lies real ground for peaking into the past and seeing what happened.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Darryl Kenyon
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post

    BTW, that's Nagórna - "Nagornak" was a mistake in HL Adam's 1930 book The Trial of George Chapman, which stuck until around 2010 when I uncovered the error. Also, I don't think Kłosowski​ formally studied Yiddish per se, but he'd have acquired some fluency in the language, given where he grew up and the circles he moved in.
    There is a Nagorna in Poland

    Leave a comment:


  • Darryl Kenyon
    replied
    When we look at the GSG one point sometimes raised is that the writing was left to cast suspicion on the Jews, after he murdered Liz in the yard of a Jewish socialist club as well .
    The point here is, if this was his reason he didn't do a very good job of it since most people believe the GSG was a racial slur aimed at the Jews. Plus there is the shout of Lipski as well , another racial slur. I think we can discount this objective.

    So, did the killer have a perceived injustice aimed at the Jews? Well if he did it was only shown on 30 Sept, perhaps with the killing of Liz in Dutfields yard and the GSG.
    No such hints that he may have been antisemitic with the murders of Martha, Polly , Annie and Mary with the choice of victim or location. Is there any other evidence that Jack was antisemitic ? Was he known to try and say burn down a synagogue ? Did he attack any Jewish women ? Were any synagogues vandalised or Jewish ladies attacked during that Autumn ? Was any letters written to anyone where he say, blamed the Jews for his killing spree ?Instead of what most people believe, IE He had a deep seated psychotic hatred within him, probably aimed at women in general. And why wasn't a note or some graffiti found in Millers court where he had time ? Leaving a chalked message in Goulston st was high risk [ considering also that two policemen were known to patrol said street ], and a high risk which he need not have done. He could have very easily taken the apron part home with him and posted it to say Lemen st Police station with a note.
    That apron could effectively have been swept up with the rubbish in the recess the next morning, and no one would have been any the wiser . It is only down to PC Long's intuition that we have it.

    So was Jack peeved off because he was interrupted at Dutfields yard etc Well if he was it certainly wasn't Schwartz who interrupted him since he murdered Liz after Schwartz had allegedly hurried from the scene. And it was almost certainly PC Watkin who disturbed him in Mitre Sq if Jack hadn't already finished his grisly work .
    I would discount this for a reason.

    Not only that but no one is 100% sure what was written down anyway. For instance in a report from 1896, Swanson says the spelling was JEWES not JUWES as is generally thought. And we have differing accounts as to the precise wording - The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing . But Dc Halse claimed it was The Juwes are not the men that will be blamed for nothing .

    Yes it was crass stupidity as Anderson says to erase the writing. It was and is a possible clue. But my own view is we should treat it with caution.

    Regards Darryl

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Darryl Kenyon View Post

    Severin Klosowski [ George Chapman ], was born in Nagornak Poland. He studied Yiddish . He murdered three women what we know of.
    BTW, that's Nagórna - "Nagornak" was a mistake in HL Adam's 1930 book The Trial of George Chapman, which stuck until around 2010 when I uncovered the error. Also, I don't think Kłosowski​ formally studied Yiddish per se, but he'd have acquired some fluency in the language, given where he grew up and the circles he moved in.

    Leave a comment:


  • PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post

    Have you read Adam Wood's book, Swanson? Fortunately, I'm not the only one who thinks the Anderson/Swanson 'Kosminski' might be someone with more meat on them than Aaron. That's why I consider 'Kosminski' and Aaron as two different arguments, until they're proved to be one and the same. Too many discrepancies. I must admit my biggest problem with Aaron is his age. 23? When I look at the Ripper crimes, I do not see the hand of a 23 year-old.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    I have made the same point before about Kosminski's age - and also about Kaminski and Kłosowski.

    There is no-one that young among any of the suspects' descriptions supplied by witnesses.

    Since the vast majority of the suspects could not have been the murderer, that may not be conclusive, but it does seem to suggest that the victims' clients were rarely so young.

    I agree also that the murderer is unlikely to have been that young anyway.

    It seems that an age close to 30 is more likely - and that was the estimate provided by both Lawende and Schwartz.​

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post


    Yes.

    I did mean Aaron.

    If Swanson had someone else in mind, then either he had a different first name, in which case there is no record of such a person at Colney Hatch, or Swanson got his name wrong - in which case, one wonders what else he may have got wrong.
    Have you read Adam Wood's book, Swanson? Fortunately, I'm not the only one who thinks the Anderson/Swanson 'Kosminski' might be someone with more meat on them than Aaron. That's why I consider 'Kosminski' and Aaron as two different arguments, until they're proved to be one and the same. Too many discrepancies. I must admit my biggest problem with Aaron is his age. 23? When I look at the Ripper crimes, I do not see the hand of a 23 year-old.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1
    replied
    Originally posted by c.d. View Post
    As I have pointed out previously, there is no record of a Polish Jewish serial killer anywhere.

    Even if we accept this as an absolute certainty, what conclusions can we draw from it? Does it mean that no Polish Jew is physically capable of being a serial killer in that it would somehow violate the laws of physics like traveling faster than the speed of light?

    And even if there is no record of it, could it have happened without the killer being caught and therefore unknown?

    c.d.


    It means it is possible, but very unlikely.

    It is rather like suggesting, as has been suggested, that B.S., a broad-shouldered, stout, semi-drunk, who was assaulting a prostitute on a Saturday night, and shouting an anti-Jewish insult at a man of Jewish appearance passing by, was actually a thin Polish Jew, who was not known ever to have associated with prostitutes, nor ever to have been drunk, and who quite possibly - as suggested by a document recently published here - had been to synagogue a few hours earlier.

    I have to ask why someone would find a suggestion like that credible.
    Last edited by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1; 03-26-2023, 02:50 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Darryl Kenyon
    replied
    Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post


    As I have pointed out previously, there is no record of a Polish Jewish serial killer anywhere.

    .
    Severin Klosowski [ George Chapman ], was born in Nagornak Poland. He studied Yiddish . He murdered three women what we know of.

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    As I have pointed out previously, there is no record of a Polish Jewish serial killer anywhere.

    Even if we accept this as an absolute certainty, what conclusions can we draw from it? Does it mean that no Polish Jew is physically capable of being a serial killer in that it would somehow violate the laws of physics like traveling faster than the speed of light?

    And even if there is no record of it, could it have happened without the killer being caught and therefore unknown?

    c.d.


    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Does anyone know if Polish Jews are any less disposed to murder than Jews of other nationality?

    Leave a comment:


  • PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1
    replied
    Originally posted by Al Bundy's Eyes View Post

    Hi PI,

    Given that Kosminski grew up in Poland, we've no idea what environment he was exposed to, or what if any criminal record he may have had.

    I agree that the case against him is non existent based on what we do know.

    As I have pointed out previously, there is no record of a Polish Jewish serial killer anywhere.

    There is no record of criminality among his relations.

    The argument that there may have been incriminating evidence against him which may have been lost is not credible.

    The 'many circs', which are so often cited as evidence against him - if there were any - constitute nothing more than circumstantial evidence.

    Whatever they may have been, they are not mentioned by Anderson or Swanson, but again we are told that they must have known something.

    There is no evidence that Kosminski was known to the police before his incarceration and there is evidence that he was not.

    I suggest that if all the lost documents could be read, there would be nothing incriminating in them about him, and that if he had been accused at the time, he would, like Piser, have been able to produce cast-iron alibis.

    And I would say the same about Druitt and Lechmere.

    Leave a comment:


  • Al Bundy's Eyes
    replied
    Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post


    As I am sure Trevor Marriott will confirm, Napper's background is typical of that of serial killers - he came from a dysfunctional and violent home

    There is nothing similar in Kosminski's case.

    It was well-known that violent homes were almost unheard of in the Jewish community in Whitechapel.



    The whole case against him is non-existent.
    Hi PI,

    Given that Kosminski grew up in Poland, we've no idea what environment he was exposed to, or what if any criminal record he may have had.

    I agree that the case against him is non existent based on what we do know.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Is it an absolute fact that all killers have been ‘in trouble’ before being revealed as a killer or is this a convenient generalisation?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X