Originally posted by The Baron
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Chapman’s death.
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
This would be after he rendered her unconscious due to strangling her , is that correct ?
Right after she said ''no'' is this also correct ?
And they were between the steps and the fence and there was no sign of a struggle ? correct?
Just want to make sure we agree on this .Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by JeffHamm View Post
Given that is his sworn inquest statement, that is all the proof I need to put the onus on you to show evidence that his statement was incorrect. In short, the evidence we have indicates he was at work, to discard that requires you demonstrate that part of his statement specifically is untrue or erroneous. Otherwise, suggesting that it might be untrue is just an unsubstantiated hypothesis, and so holds no value in terms of proof that my evidence based claim is incorrect.
- JeffRegards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Baron View Post
So you couldn't. Was expected.
Who is the one saying Chapman was killed 5:20 am beyond all reasonable doubt ?!
He has to prove that. wheather you like this or not.
You know what, it helps when you read all the posts, it may give you a better understanding of the situation in hand.
The BaronRegards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View PostPhillips was a medical man, he was quite right to give his expert medical opinion on her t.o.d, i questioned his judgement when saying that Chapman was killed where she was found on the bases he was not qualified to make such a call. Answered.
Not answered properly. There are no qualifications for looking for signs of blood. What a ludicrous suggestion. Policemen didn’t have qualifications. They had eyes...like Phillips.
As for whether it was Annie or the killer that made the noise that hit the fence , you believe it was one or the other, and ive given a very plausible explanation that it might not have been either ,but you ignore it just like everything else. so be it , let the frustration continue
And at least 6 times, after me explaining it to you, you’ve continued to post the same falsehood. Is this honest posting?
Please try not to.
Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
I don’t think he was. It would be hard to cut with steps in the way. I think he stood Above her head. ''I think he lowered her down by the shoulders'', and stood at the top of her head. It’s tight, but you’re not reaching over things.
This would be after he rendered her unconscious due to strangling her , is that correct ?
Right after she said ''no'' is this also correct ?
And they were between the steps and the fence and there was no sign of a struggle ? correct?
Just want to make sure we agree on this .
my apologies this was a response i was referring to from another post'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
Answer the 3 question firstRegards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Not answered properly. There are no qualifications for looking for signs of blood. What a
ludicrous suggestion. Policemen didn’t have qualifications. They had eyes...like Phillips.
thanks you just prove my point . like i said answered .'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
thanks you just prove my point . like i said answered .
Estimating TOD is a matter of science requiring knowledge and training. It’s not something that anyone can attempt to do.
Checking for evidence that a person was killed anywhere is simply a matter of checking for signs. Mainly blood. This requires eyesight. It’s of no great difficulty.
And so....
Why do you believe that Phillips was correct on something so difficult; something with so many variants (some of which Phillips wouldn’t have been aware of in 1888) and yet you think him incompetent to look for blood?
It’s like saying that a person is capable of juggling six balls but is incapable of juggling two!Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
This would be after he rendered her unconscious due to strangling her , is that correct ?
Has it been proven that she was strangled? I’m not saying that she wasn’t of course but I wasn’t aware that this was a proven fact.
Right after she said ''no'' is this also correct ?
If the “no” came from Annie then I’d tend toward the fact that she said it before she died, yes.
And they were between the steps and the fence and there was no sign of a struggle ? correct?
Errata is suggesting that the killer knelt above Annie’s head to do the mutilations. Unlike you Errata isn’t claiming to be psychic. He/she is suggesting a possibility.
Just want to make sure we agree on this .
my apologies this was a response i was referring to from another post
I don’t see what point you are trying to make? The fact is that none of us know what position the killer was in when he committed the mutilations and it’s entirely plausible that he changed position during the mutilations to get better access. There’s nothing controversial about this suggestion as far as I’m aware. The only issue here is that you’ve stated something as a fact when it’s only your opinion.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
We know that blood splatters were on that fence, about 12-18 inches from the bottom of the fence if I recall, That proximity to the fence, and the fact that it was thought to be arterial spray, meant her position in relation to the fence might have easily been the cause of the thud as he lowered her onto her back. I think this killer first choked his victim to unconsciousness, like he did with Polly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Michael W Richards View PostWe know that blood splatters were on that fence, about 12-18 inches from the bottom of the fence if I recall, That proximity to the fence, and the fact that it was thought to be arterial spray, meant her position in relation to the fence might have easily been the cause of the thud as he lowered her onto her back. I think this killer first choked his victim to unconsciousness, like he did with Polly.My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Comment
Comment