Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

For what reason do we include Stride?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    All sidewalks are footways, but not all footways are sidewalks. You're quite right in stating that the surfaced entrance to the yard wouldn't be described as a footway, though.
    Yes, I wasn't intentionally disagreeing with you. I took your reply as 'in general'. I was trying to be specific to that location. The footways in the city run along the sides of the road, which is the same as a sidewalk.
    However, footways may run elsewhere away from a road.
    There was no footway running into Dutfields Yard. There were carriage ruts (or drainage channels?) but the rest of the yard was cobblestone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Guy View Post
    Hi John
    Where Stride was lying was where the wheels of any traffic would have passed, so it could have been muddy against the wall, with all the crap that comes off the wheels or gets brushed aside.
    It was wet and late September so there must have been muck lying around the yard on the cobblestones.
    But Jon, where does the soil come from?
    Diemschitz had come from Crystal Palace and the cart was kept in George Yard, Cable Street.
    The roads between Crystal Palace and Berner St. are all paved or cobbled.
    George Yard was cobbled just like Dutfields Yard.
    Where does the cart wheel pick up wet soil?


    Agreed, but there was no footway in front of the gates,...
    Yes, there was cobbles between the gates and the road, but the cobbles ran across the footway.

    ....and bearing in mind that the two Schwartz statements were both translations, and may have meant passageway, as in the Star, (the version I like as it suits my theory :-)
    Be my guest Jon, pick a newspaper that suits your theory - attaboy!
    Last edited by Wickerman; 09-28-2018, 03:39 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    "Indeed, Berner Street was within spitting-distance of Devonshire Street, where she and Michael Kidney had both lived and, I believe, where Kidney was to live again. That she met her end at the hands of a jealous old flame (or her current one) seems a reasonable possibility to me.

    Hello Sam,

    If the police didn't suspect Kidney they would have had to have been ten kinds of idiot. I think it much more likely that they questioned him and he had an alibi. If he had no alibi they would have paraded him in front of Schwartz.

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    Like a narrow pathway that ran flush with the outer wall of the Club? Can't recall off-hand but, even if there were, I'd have expected the report to have indicated that this particular footway was inside the gates.

    I note that footway was also used to describe where Polly Nichols was found: "Police-constable Neill [sic]... came upon the body of a woman lying on a part of the footway" (The Times, 1st Sept 1888).

    The word was also used to describe where Eddowes was found drunk: "The deceased was lying on the footway in High street, Aldgate, drunk" (St James Gazette, 12th Oct 1888).

    ... and where she was found dead in Mitre Square: "The body was lying on its back, on the footway, with the head towards a hoarding" (Daily News, 1st Oct 1888).
    thanks sam!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Thanks!
    do we know if any kind of footway/sidewalk extended into the yard?
    Like a narrow pathway that ran flush with the outer wall of the Club? Can't recall off-hand but, even if there were, I'd have expected the report to have indicated that this particular footway was inside the gates.

    I note that footway was also used to describe where Polly Nichols was found: "Police-constable Neill [sic]... came upon the body of a woman lying on a part of the footway" (The Times, 1st Sept 1888).

    The word was also used to describe where Eddowes was found drunk: "The deceased was lying on the footway in High street, Aldgate, drunk" (St James Gazette, 12th Oct 1888).

    ... and where she was found dead in Mitre Square: "The body was lying on its back, on the footway, with the head towards a hoarding" (Daily News, 1st Oct 1888).

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Jon Guy View Post
    Abby... I apologise. i`m at work and I won`t get time to answer your post till Mon. i`m off the grid at home !!Have a great weekend bud
    you too my friend!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Hi Jon
    One thing I have little doubt is that BS man, AKA peaked cap to me, was strides killer and JTR.

    I have a lot of little scenarios on how the specifics of the BS man/stride murder may have went down.

    the one I favor:
    BS man is the man that Marshall, schwartz and probably the PC saw with stride. perhaps Best too, but just got the hat completely wrong.


    BS man meets stride somewhere, perhaps the pub, and is trying to finagle her to a secluded spot. Shes not going-I think because she was not actively soliciting, maybe wary of the ripper murders-she just broken up and seems to me to be out having a good time maybe keeping an eye out for her next boyfreind/sugar daddy.

    BS man getting more frustated-hes spending time and money on her-perhaps bought her drinks, flower,cashoo and shes still not going.


    finally after one last time to try to get her to a secluded spot she refuses and he loses his temper and attacks her at the club, cutting her throat.


    I think more than likely, schwartz saw the attack/beginning of the attack, just didnt specifically see him cut her throat.


    Her hand goes to her throat, BS man skidaddles, stride stumbles into the yard toward the voices and perceived help but expires in the yard.
    Abby... I apologise. i`m at work and I won`t get time to answer your post till Mon. i`m off the grid at home !!Have a great weekend bud

    Leave a comment:


  • Darryl Kenyon
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    after BS man assaulted her and left?
    Yes, not that I am sure BS existed

    Leave a comment:


  • Darryl Kenyon
    replied
    Originally posted by Batman View Post
    However, they were thwarted by the 'real' JtR who ended up doing his best to blame the Jews by writing the Goulston St. Graffiti and dropping a piece of Eddowes Apron right in the heart of a Jewish area also?

    JtR was trying to pin it on Jews then.

    Just like he was obviously trying to pin it on Jews in Berner St.

    Why was he trying to pin it on the Jews?

    Because there was anti-semitic mania at the time heightened by the murders. Pizer! The fact the GSG was rubbed out demonstrates this is the case.

    A Jew at the time would have to be out of his raving mind to murder a woman right next to a Jewish socialist club in the dead of night in the middle of all of this. Everyone in the club was searched. You would need a CONSPIRACY THEORY to support this version of unlikely events.
    I am not saying Jack was a Jew and i am not saying he was right. But Anderson certainly didn't think it was a Gentile trying to incriminate one. And the conclusion we came to is that certain low-class Polish Jews etc If Jack was trying to incriminate the Jews by killing someone outside a known Jewish club, how did he know there would be a victim there that night?
    More likely Jack killed where the opportunity arose. Far away enough from his home but close enough to were he would feel comfortable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    All sidewalks are footways, but not all footways are sidewalks. You're quite right in stating that the surfaced entrance to the yard wouldn't be described as a footway, though.
    Thanks!
    do we know if any kind of footway/sidewalk extended into the yard?

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Darryl Kenyon View Post
    I agree with Michael to a certain extent. But I feel it was Jack who murdered Liz. I feel he came up behind her, possibly being already in the passageway [she may not have even heard him over the singing], grabbed her by the scarf, pulling it tight, lowering her down on her left side before slitting her throat so the blood ran away from him down the gutter and pooled under her body.
    after BS man assaulted her and left?

    Leave a comment:


  • Darryl Kenyon
    replied
    I agree with Michael to a certain extent. But I feel it was Jack who murdered Liz. I feel he came up behind her, possibly being already in the passageway [she may not have even heard him over the singing], grabbed her by the scarf, pulling it tight, lowering her down on her left side before slitting her throat so the blood ran away from him down the gutter and pooled under her body.

    Leave a comment:


  • Darryl Kenyon
    replied
    Originally posted by Batman View Post
    I think 'need' in terms of a serial sexual homicide offender is very different from what 'need' means to normal people.

    In terms of the double murder, these crimes have all the hallmarks of an offender unable to achieve their signature (ripping) which is vital to the emotional need they set to get.

    JtR didn't get it with Stride.

    Also, he would have been decompensating following a failed attempt which explains him taking bigger risks that can get him caught (Mitre Square).

    So quite the opposite of what you think would happen, could happen, namely, instead of fleeing and going into cool down mode, he doubles down on finding a victim to achieve the signature he needs. As is demonstrated throughout crime history with many of these offenders.

    Furthermore, the GSG is aimed at Jews following what appears to be Jews getting in his way with Stride certainly and then again with Lewende and friends.

    I am surprised that the people who think that Stride was murdered by a Jew at the socialist club on Berner St., aren't putting together that JtR was perhaps playing to people's fears that a Jew was responsible for the murders.

    An assault on a woman at night during the Whitechapel murders is exactly the sort of thing LE at the time would wanted to have known about. Consider Leather Apron. What we he guilty of? Look what happened to Piser. He was let go because he didn't do anything, but suspicion was enough to have half of London after him.

    We can be guaranteed that JtR assaulted other women before the Whitechapel murders and during them, which went unreported.

    Here is another red blotchy faced person for example doing just that...

    A little after midnight on March 28 1888, thirty-nine-year-old Ada Wilson, a dress maker, was sitting in her room at 9 Maidman Street, Mile End, when there was a knock on the door.

    Opening it, she found a man aged about thirty, who was around five foot six in height, and who had a fair moustache and a sunburnt face standing outside. His clothes consisted of a dark coat, light trousers and a wide-awake hat. The man threatened to kill her if she didn’t give him money. When Ada refused, he took out a clasp-knife and stabbed her twice in the throat.
    I am struggling with this. If Jack had to have the signature he needs, why did he kill Liz in the first place after he had been seen? If he knew he then could not go on to mutilate her for fear of being caught instead of just slitting her throat and making a quick getaway? Basically, he wouldn't. No gratification and all he is doing is putting himself in danger. And if we can be guaranteed that he assaulted other women during and before the murders as you say, [which incidentally i think is likely]. Then why didn't he kill them? Well, probably the main reason is that he may have been spotted assaulting said women so he couldn't kill them. but isn't that exactly what he did with Liz?
    Last edited by Darryl Kenyon; 09-28-2018, 08:01 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
    A "footway" is constructed for the purpose of foot traffic, so yes it is a sidewalk.
    A "footway" can be asphalt or stone paving (flags).
    It is also stated in some accounts that it is unlawful for wheeled carriages to be on footways. Which is the case for footpaths/sidewalks, but not entrances to yards whether paved or cobbled. This only serves to clarify that the victorian term "footway" was a paved section of the common street running along both sides of the road, not the resurfaced entrance to a yard.
    All sidewalks are footways, but not all footways are sidewalks. You're quite right in stating that the surfaced entrance to the yard wouldn't be described as a footway, though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Hi John

    Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
    In reviewing press cuttings there is a possibility that the term 'mud' is being used as a euphemism for horse dropping.

    Dutfields Yard was cobblestone, not grass or soil, so the fact Stride had 'mud' on her side may only mean she fell on some horse dung, not on soil.
    The yard was cobblestones.

    Stride could have fallen a second time on the paving or cobbles where there was no horse dung therefore no direct evidence would be present indicating a second fall.
    Where Stride was lying was where the wheels of any traffic would have passed, so it could have been muddy against the wall, with all the crap that comes off the wheels or gets brushed aside.
    It was wet and late September so there must have been muck lying around the yard on the cobblestones.

    The second point, "footway" means pavement, paving flags, or footpath in English terminology.

    Here is mention of a footway on both sides of the street, ie footpath.



    If Stride was assaulted on the footway, then she was assaulted outside the gates, on the common footpath.
    Agreed, but there was no footway in front of the gates, and bearing in mind that the two Schwartz statements were both translations, and may have meant passageway, as in the Star, (the version I like as it suits my theory :-)

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X