If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
"I was just wondering why you were highlighting Eddowes and Stride only as having no signs of recent sexual activity when none of the Whitechapel murder victims did?"
I thought I had answered that one? Try post #209.
Cheers.
LC
Lets sort the wheat from the chafe out on this topic of connection.It painful to watch these posts.
The doctors suggest no recent connection, but surely that does not mean that none took place.?
The doctors would have been looking for signs of semen externally and internally. If they had been with anyone and had engaged in vaginal or anal sex then who is to say that the person or persons they went with did not ejaculate outside of the body. On the floor etc. Or even orally for that matter. If a client did not have sufficient money for the full menu. They would have been offered a starter at a reduced rate.
I was just wondering why you were highlighting Eddowes and Stride only as having no signs of recent sexual activity when none of the Whitechapel murder victims did?
Hello all,
I think the chances are that all of the victims would try to beg, borrow or steal money before resorting to prostitution. Mary Kelly asked Hutchinson for a loan. And then there is always the take the money and run option. Polly (and the others) may have obtained money by any of the above options - no need for washing as an explanation, they just didn't have sex.
Absolutely, Coles strung poor old Sadler out on the Saturday, getting her drinks, bed, food and a bonnet (and some raffle tickets) and then pretended to be dead drunk or asleep when he wanted a bit of ow`s your father.
Annie Farmer nicked her own neck and screamed bloody murder as soon as she got the money before any action took place.
An even simpler explanation is that they were all killed before any type of sexual activity took place.
c.d.
That would depend on when last they had any connection before their murders. I am sure at their prices they would have been able to accommodate someone.
Street prostitutes are always on the look out for business whilst they are on the street that is a fact.
Lets sort the wheat from the chafe out on this topic of connection.It painful to watch these posts.
The doctors suggest no recent connection, but surely that does not mean that none took place.?
The doctors would have been looking for signs of semen externally and internally. If they had been with anyone and had engaged in vaginal or anal sex then who is to say that the person or persons they went with did not ejaculate outside of the body. On the floor etc. Or even orally for that matter. If a client did not have sufficient money for the full menu. They would have been offered a starter at a reduced rate.
Stride may have had an evening of flowers, cachous, food and drink on the basis of ending the night in a common lodging house.
Nichols could have just spent the day with the one man and considered the drinks he bought as the earnings she mentioned.
Sorry it`s painful to watch Trev, but there`s a good chance they hadn`t had sex.
Did Alice Graham have sex with Grainger?
Many assume it was all knee tremblers in alley`s but many of the cases we are familiar with have the woman and man expecting to end the night together in a common lodging house.
So there is a very good chance they had not had sex when they were found.
The fact that Coles walked off with a punter half an hour or so before she was seen again, dead, and yet she had no signs of connection, may be due to the fact it was THAT punter that killed her.
My point was that they may have washed after previous customers and prior to encountering their killer and that they were killed before any sexual activity took place with their killer.
Hello David. But surely not as grotesque as the case has become with all that ripper rot?
Time to understand that it is fiction.
Cheers.
LC
Hi Lynn,
actually you prove me right all along this thread : you're a negationist using the methods of negationism.
You often avoid questions you're asked (latest example, Jon Guy's), or answer them flippantly. You focus on minor détails, such as Kate's pockets, the fact that she would have been thirsty and hungry (???), etc.
And when you're kind enough to expose a whole scenario, the result is unbelievable : Stride killed by a club member, protected by a huge, fast and unfailing conspiracy.
I'm not being nasty, that's just what you are doing.
My point was that they may have washed after previous customers and prior to encountering their killer and that they were killed before any sexual activity took place with their killer.
c.d.
Where would they wash a horse trough. I am sure they would vrey lady like dangling their arses over a trough. What about the poor horses that has to drink afterwards.
More as likely as not Eddowes wiped herself with the apron piece as against washing ! after sex before she met her killer
Comment