Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bible John (General Discussion)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • barnflatwyngarde
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
    I’ve put the book that I’m currently reading on hold to read the Crow and Samson book which arrived today. It’s only a slim book so I may finish it in one go. There’s one thing about it that irritates anlready and it’s something that irritates when it occurs in any book. When talking about Helen Puttock the chapter begins “Helen Puttock cursed under her breath. She couldn’t find her favourite crimson lipstick. Her right hand danced across the dressing table, searching frantically for her make-up bag”

    You can see what I mean. I really hate it when authors writing factual books do this. All that it does is make you think ‘ok, so what else are you inventing just to pad out the story or to make it more interesting?’ I’m definitely not writing off the book but it doesn’t help.
    Agreed Herlock.
    Once you go down the road of inventing dialogue and thoughts, it tends not to end well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    I’ve put the book that I’m currently reading on hold to read the Crow and Samson book which arrived today. It’s only a slim book so I may finish it in one go. There’s one thing about it that irritates anlready and it’s something that irritates when it occurs in any book. When talking about Helen Puttock the chapter begins “Helen Puttock cursed under her breath. She couldn’t find her favourite crimson lipstick. Her right hand danced across the dressing table, searching frantically for her make-up bag”

    You can see what I mean. I really hate it when authors writing factual books do this. All that it does is make you think ‘ok, so what else are you inventing just to pad out the story or to make it more interesting?’ I’m definitely not writing off the book but it doesn’t help.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ms Diddles
    replied
    Amazing!

    Thanks so much for that veritable smorgasbord of information, Barn.

    That's much appreciated.

    I will certainly check out the Mitchell's Glasgow Room and also the links to the SMT sites that you've kindly included.

    I'd thought about the Transport Museum myself.

    It's a long time since I've been there, but I seem to remember it was quite an interesting way to spend a rainy afternoon.

    Thanks again for your help.

    Leave a comment:


  • barnflatwyngarde
    replied
    Ms D, you might also want to try Glasgow Riverside Museum of Transport.

    Home to one of the world's finest transport collections. Interactive displays and the much loved historic Glasgow street scene bring the objects and stories to life.

    Leave a comment:


  • barnflatwyngarde
    replied
    Originally posted by Ms Diddles View Post

    Here's a question for you Barn in your capacity as our local library expert;

    I'm trying to find some Glasgow Corporation bus timetables from 1969 (just an idea I'm playing around with).

    Do you think the Mitchell would have anything like this?

    I found ones online for 1967 and 1970, but you have to pay for them, and I'm not convinced they would contain all the details I'm looking for so don't want to fork out unnecessarily.
    Hi Ms D, I would suggest that you make the Mitchell Library your first port of call, specifically the Glasgow Room.

    I never worked in the Glasgow Room, I was in the Arts Department, but their collection of all things Glaswegian is comprehensive.

    The Glasgow Collection is one of the largest collections in The Mitchell Library, created on the founding of The Mitchell in 1874 to collect Glasgow-related material.


    If you have no luck there, I would suggest checking Glasgow Archives, also based in the Mitchell Library.



    You can phone the Mitchell with any enquiries, they still get a high percentage of enquiries via the phone.

    You can also try the National Library of Scotland



    I also include a link to a site on the history of the SMT Bus Company, and a link to a route map that covers Stonehouse.





    My recollection is that Glasgow and Greater Glasgow were covered by Corporation buses, the yellow and green ones.
    Beyond Glasgow was covered, in my area a least, by the SMT buses, the red ones.

    I hope some of this helps, good luck!

    Leave a comment:


  • cobalt
    replied
    Ms D,

    Great minds think alike, but fools....

    The last bus from Glasgow to Stonehouse area was something that I had considered myself. Maybe at weekends there was a later service. I estimated that the last bus would be nearer to 11 o'clock than midnight (remember Scottish bars closed at 10pm in these days) but maybe Friday and Saturday would be later due to dance halls closing at 12 o'clock.

    The ferry crossing theory considered by the police remains explained. Maybe it was part of their mindset: the Peter Manuel killing of the Watt family circa 1956 was originally pinned on the husband who it was claimed had been seen crossing the Yoker/Renfrew ferry with his car. The ferry witness then became a little hesitant and Watt was released. If Watt had returned to kill his family and driven back to his holiday retreat the ferry would not have been the fastest route anyway, over and above the problem of being remembered in the early hours of the morning. Yet for two months Watt was held in Barlinnie Prison on this theory.

    I don't think data protection existed as a problem in 1969. The senior police detectives were certainly on a mission when they descended on Hamilton police station but whether that mission was accomplished or aborted we don't know. I think the latter, probably on the basis of an apparently cast iron alibi being presented.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ms Diddles
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    I’m the same tbh. I can’t see them protecting a serial killer so maybe they didn’t think that he was guilty but they still wanted to keep his name out of it? It’s clear that we need more info though.
    This is awfully vague and I haven't really thought it through, but it occurred to me they could be covering up something but nothing as significant as McInnes' guilt.

    Some stupid mistake or data breach by one of the senior officers, some crucial missed opportunity, I don't know.

    You're right that there are signs of something fishy going on, but I just don't believe that they would let a guy who had murdered three women (and could kill again) walk, simply because his cousin was a senior officer and pal of Joe Beattie.

    With all the media interest and careers to be made or broken by the outcome.

    That just doesn't add up to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ms Diddles
    replied
    Originally posted by barnflatwyngarde View Post

    I'll check it out Ms D and get back to you.
    Are you checking out the number 6 timetable perchance?
    Errrrrrm! I hadn't got as far as identifying particular service numbers!

    I'm just a bit intrigued as to why the police had such a bee in their bonnet about BJ making for the southside / Govan.

    I thought it would be interesting if there was an early morning service from the Govan depot heading out Stonehouse / Strathaven way.

    It wouldn't prove anything of course, but would be of interest nonetheless.

    Thanks for your help.

    Leave a comment:


  • barnflatwyngarde
    replied
    Originally posted by Ms Diddles View Post

    Here's a question for you Barn in your capacity as our local library expert;

    I'm trying to find some Glasgow Corporation bus timetables from 1969 (just an idea I'm playing around with).

    Do you think the Mitchell would have anything like this?

    I found ones online for 1967 and 1970, but you have to pay for them, and I'm not convinced they would contain all the details I'm looking for so don't want to fork out unnecessarily.
    I'll check it out Ms D and get back to you.
    Last edited by barnflatwyngarde; 08-19-2024, 07:21 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by Ms Diddles View Post

    It definitely looks like there's something going on here.

    There's a big part of the jigsaw missing.

    I'm just a little resistant to the idea of a cover-up to protect McInnes' cousin for the reasons stated previously.

    I haven't had chance to re-listen to the podcasts yet, but really need to do that, as I remember it goes into some detail about a possible cover-up.

    Perhaps it will all make a bit more sense after that.
    I’m the same tbh. I can’t see them protecting a serial killer so maybe they didn’t think that he was guilty but they still wanted to keep his name out of it? It’s clear that we need more info though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ms Diddles
    replied
    Originally posted by barnflatwyngarde View Post

    Herlock, you can order the Stoddart book via your library on an Inter-Library-Loan.
    Every book published in the UK is sent to one of six legal deposit libraries.

    Your local library will get the book from one these six libraries.
    There might be a charge of about a fiver or so, but when you get the book you can photocopy what you need under "fair use" guidelines.
    Here's a question for you Barn in your capacity as our local library expert;

    I'm trying to find some Glasgow Corporation bus timetables from 1969 (just an idea I'm playing around with).

    Do you think the Mitchell would have anything like this?

    I found ones online for 1967 and 1970, but you have to pay for them, and I'm not convinced they would contain all the details I'm looking for so don't want to fork out unnecessarily.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ms Diddles
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    That still leaves us with the problem of why the detectives thought McInnes was such a strong suspect in the first place. And on top of that, why did they drop him like a hot potato?

    Even if he suggested an alibi, and even if it was backed up they would still have wanted Jean to see him. How could this have been avoided without causing huge suspicion? And if it did then Jean must have rejected him. Yet the CC detectives suggest that Jean might not have seen him. If so, it’s a cover-up.
    It definitely looks like there's something going on here.

    There's a big part of the jigsaw missing.

    I'm just a little resistant to the idea of a cover-up to protect McInnes' cousin for the reasons stated previously.

    I haven't had chance to re-listen to the podcasts yet, but really need to do that, as I remember it goes into some detail about a possible cover-up.

    Perhaps it will all make a bit more sense after that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by barnflatwyngarde View Post

    Herlock, you can order the Stoddart book via your library on an Inter-Library-Loan.
    Every book published in the UK is sent to one of six legal deposit libraries.

    Your local library will get the book from one these six libraries.
    There might be a charge of about a fiver or so, but when you get the book you can photocopy what you need under "fair use" guidelines.
    Cheers Barn. I’ll give it a try the next time I get to the library.

    Leave a comment:


  • barnflatwyngarde
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    I’ve just ordered the Samson and Crow book Barn which I thought was unavailable for some reason. I’m not paying £65 for the Stoddart book though. I’ll wait til a cheaper copy becomes available.
    Herlock, you can order the Stoddart book via your library on an Inter-Library-Loan.
    Every book published in the UK is sent to one of six legal deposit libraries.

    Your local library will get the book from one these six libraries.
    There might be a charge of about a fiver or so, but when you get the book you can photocopy what you need under "fair use" guidelines.

    Leave a comment:


  • New Waterloo
    replied
    Yes agree with everybody regarding the strange attendance of such senior officers at Hamilton Police Station. It is most unusual for there to be one Superintendent let alone two!

    I do think that as far as ruling out McInnes as BJ. Perhaps (although we may not like it) his teeth didn't match witness descriptions or the possible possible bite marks. (remember he had his own teeth then) Perhaps this group of four officers at that point in time were the only high level individuals who had knowledge of any bite marks and wanted to have a discreet look without arousing suspicion and tipping off any other offender of the trail they were following.

    Another thought is that if McInnes cried help and his Chief Inspector relative appeared at Hamilton and became involved in talking with the investigators I believe it is procedurally correct or etiquette that in a serious investigation he would have to have been spoken to by an officer of the same rank or above. (Might be wrong but I think that is the case) So they arranged a high level team.

    I think I am grasping at straws but a couple of ideas.

    NW

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X