Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bible John (General Discussion)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • cobalt
    replied
    A very powerful photo where every face tells a story and church spires are visible behind the rather grim stonework of the tenements. I'd guess it was taken around the mid 1950s- maybe part of the Bert Hardy collection for Picture Post?

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Great photo Barn

    Leave a comment:


  • barnflatwyngarde
    replied
    Sorry guys, while I'm wallowing in nostalgia, I thought that I'd share this excellent photo.

    It shows kids playing in the back court and shows the washing and the bins that were in the back court, another reason why there would no secure doors at the front or back of the close is that the binmen would need access to the bins in the back court.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Fz8Qf0iWIAA9J3P.jpg
Views:	116
Size:	139.3 KB
ID:	839134

    Leave a comment:


  • barnflatwyngarde
    replied
    Originally posted by Ms Diddles View Post
    Does anyone (@barnflatwyngarde?) know whether Glasgow tenements would have had security locks on the close door back in the BJ era?

    I'm a little mystified by:

    a) how BJ and Helen Puttock got through to the back court of number 95 (no lock? broken lock?)

    b) why they accessed the back close. Yes, I know there's an obvious answer to that!! I'm just not sure sex was on the cards. The fact that the taxi driver reported a scuffle after they exited the taxi which he just attributed to a domestic dispute doesn't really sound like foreplay.

    It makes me wonder at what precise moment things turned nasty and, if it was relatively soon after exiting the taxi, why did Helen accompany BJ into the back court or not scream the place down if she was forced.

    She sounds like a feisty Glasgow lass.

    Anyone got any thoughts on this?
    Hi Ms D,
    I spent the first 11 years of my life living in a glasgow tenement.

    There were 3 houses on every landing with a shared toilet for every landing.
    There was no door at the front or the back of the tenement, you could walk off the front street straight through to the back court.
    The back court was a large area where the outside bins were and where the washing was hung up to dry.

    The houses on Earl Street look as if they are quite modern for 1960's Glasgow, they are much nicer than the kind of tenement I grew up in (see photo attached).
    However I can say with certainty that there would be no security doors obstructing entry to the close or the back court.

    I have no idea why they went to the back court, I can only ussume it was for a kiss and cuddle.
    If Helen had been attacked in the close itself, the echo would have reverberated throughout the building.
    The close was in effect a huge echo chamber, so I assume that she went through the close to the back court willingly.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	download (1).jpg
Views:	111
Size:	20.2 KB
ID:	839132

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by Ms Diddles View Post
    Does anyone (@barnflatwyngarde?) know whether Glasgow tenements would have had security locks on the close door back in the BJ era?

    I'm a little mystified by:

    a) how BJ and Helen Puttock got through to the back court of number 95 (no lock? broken lock?)

    b) why they accessed the back close. Yes, I know there's an obvious answer to that!! I'm just not sure sex was on the cards. The fact that the taxi driver reported a scuffle after they exited the taxi which he just attributed to a domestic dispute doesn't really sound like foreplay.

    It makes me wonder at what precise moment things turned nasty and, if it was relatively soon after exiting the taxi, why did Helen accompany BJ into the back court or not scream the place down if she was forced.

    She sounds like a feisty Glasgow lass.

    Actually this might perhaps at least partially explain why no one heard screaming? It does sound like ‘feisty’ was a fitting word to describe Helen. When cautioned against going out because of the dangers facing women she brandished her nails as if they were weapons. Also, from the podcast, Helen did suffer some domestic violence so, whilst I’m certainly not putting her in any category with the JtR victims, I’m guessing that life had maybe toughened Helen up. Or maybe she didn’t want it to become public knowledge that she was with a man that wasn’t her husband?

    Anyone got any thoughts on this?
    Hi Ms D,

    As you will have deduced…I’m not a Glaswegian. But couldn’t the back court have been accessible via the ‘alley’ on the right hand side of the house?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X