Madeleine McCann
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
If ever there was an argument for the return of the rack, this is it.
Leave a comment:
-
I find it odd that two intelligent forensically aware doctors would allow people in and also wash the floor and cuddle cat after they assume someone had come in and placed toy on shelf and carried her out. Also I found when they done that praying strange thing on the patio and across their bed, my first thought was that they may be covering DNA evidence.Last edited by Paddy; 04-21-2022, 11:58 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
I find it amazing that he would have been so forensically aware not to leave one shred of dna? I am still not sure that he done this. Also if he was one of the two men seen on the other balcony (with the sunglasses on) maybe casing the place, surely there would have been dna there ?Last edited by Paddy; 04-21-2022, 11:53 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JeffHamm View PostI see I'm not the first to note this today, but the German fellow has been charged. It looks like it may be a move to avoid statue of limitations issues, so not sure if the case is strong enough for a conviction. Sounds like there are circumstantial pointers, such as an alleged confession to a friend; his phone places him in the vicinity at the time; and so forth - but none of those are undeniable proof of guilt, and so could be shown to be unreliable. I'm assuming that as long as he's charged then that trumps the statue of limitations worries, so I'm not really expecting anything further to happen any time soon. It is likely they are looking for more evidence to really ensure the case against him holds up. It's not clear if they are actively investigating any more leads, though, or if the investigation has stalled and they're trying to work out what to do next in the search for evidence.
- Jeff
Leave a comment:
-
I see I'm not the first to note this today, but the German fellow has been charged. It looks like it may be a move to avoid statue of limitations issues, so not sure if the case is strong enough for a conviction. Sounds like there are circumstantial pointers, such as an alleged confession to a friend; his phone places him in the vicinity at the time; and so forth - but none of those are undeniable proof of guilt, and so could be shown to be unreliable. I'm assuming that as long as he's charged then that trumps the statue of limitations worries, so I'm not really expecting anything further to happen any time soon. It is likely they are looking for more evidence to really ensure the case against him holds up. It's not clear if they are actively investigating any more leads, though, or if the investigation has stalled and they're trying to work out what to do next in the search for evidence.
- Jeff
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ginger View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
I would like the McCann's to take polygraph tests as it might shed some light on what actually happened to Madeleine.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: