Madeleine McCann

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sunny Delight
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post

    The point is had the McCann's not left there daughter unattended she wouldn't be missing. It does not matter if all there friends did leave there children unattended. Fair point about it occuring in Portugal.

    They have to live with that choice. Forever. Imagine waking up everyday knowing what you did presented an opportunity for a predator to take your daughter never to be found. And you have two other kids to bring up. Some people may never have any sympathy for them and maybe they don't deserve any but my god nothing anyone can say or judge them about could even touch the sides of the guilt they have to live with.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by Sunny Delight View Post

    That is a different question. Does that make them involved in their daughters disappearance? Obviously not. Were they guilty of neglect? Absolutely as were all their friends. Don't forget the whole party did it. But then it would be impossible to prosecute them for that under British law when it occurred in Portugal. The law is complicated.
    The point is had the McCann's not left there daughter unattended she wouldn't be missing. It does not matter if all there friends did leave there children unattended. Fair point about it occuring in Portugal.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Didnt the mother or father delete some calls ? Were they not found?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sunny Delight
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    It would be interesting to know how Breukner first came to the attention of the police-was it by the confession to the "friend"? If so, need to know who it is and the circs around the "confession"--is it a jail house snitch type scenario?

    any way this loser does look like a good suspect-apparently he has previous sexual assaults at that resort and is a pedophile. and was there at the time.

    Hopefully they can match DNA-Im assuming they have DNA from the crime scene? Does anyone know?

    The Germans did a sift through phone numbers used in the vicinity of the Ocean Club on the night and then attempted to discern if the numbers were linked to anyone who had a criminal record. This flagged up Breuckner. There is no DNA from the crime scene as the Portuguese Police failed to secure the scene in the initial golden hour in particular. In saying that the focus was finding Madeleine so the initial Police actions were very inadequate in regards scene preservation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sunny Delight
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post

    You mean other than leaving Maddie alone for hours?
    That is a different question. Does that make them involved in their daughters disappearance? Obviously not. Were they guilty of neglect? Absolutely as were all their friends. Don't forget the whole party did it. But then it would be impossible to prosecute them for that under British law when it occurred in Portugal. The law is complicated.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post

    that they werent charged and convicted of child neglect (at least)was the second tragedy in this case. what a couple of complete and utter self centered psychopaths.
    I agree Abby and I think had they been working class rather then middle class they would have been charged and convicted of child neglect.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post

    You mean other than leaving Maddie alone for hours?
    that they werent charged and convicted of child neglect (at least)was the second tragedy in this case. what a couple of complete and utter self centered psychopaths.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by Sunny Delight View Post

    The parents were cleared long ago. There is not one iota of evidence to link them to their daughters disappearance.
    You mean other than leaving Maddie alone for hours?

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    It would be interesting to know how Breukner first came to the attention of the police-was it by the confession to the "friend"? If so, need to know who it is and the circs around the "confession"--is it a jail house snitch type scenario?

    any way this loser does look like a good suspect-apparently he has previous sexual assaults at that resort and is a pedophile. and was there at the time.

    Hopefully they can match DNA-Im assuming they have DNA from the crime scene? Does anyone know?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sunny Delight
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    I do agree he is a person of intest but so are the parents..
    The parents were cleared long ago. There is not one iota of evidence to link them to their daughters disappearance.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    I do agree he is a person of intest but so are the parents..

    Leave a comment:


  • Sunny Delight
    replied
    This guy who has been made a person if interest is certainly someone who deserves more interrogation so to speak. Here we have a:

    - Man aged at the time between 25-30, who lived locally and this is always a key starting point.

    - His phone on the night has been triangulated to being used quite close to the Ocean Club Apartments about an hour and a half before Madeleine went missing.

    - The day after Madeleine's disappearance Breuckner re-registered his car to a different person in a different country.

    - images of child abuse were found and belonged to him.

    - He had a history of robbery and breaking into hotel rooms.

    These certainly make this guy very interesting.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    It is highly likely Maddy McCann's dead. Why are the McCann's hopeful she will be found? Or do they know 100 per cent that she's dead and do they know what happened to her?

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    I find it amazing that he would have been so forensically aware not to leave one shred of dna? I am still not sure that he done this. Also if he was one of the two men seen on the other balcony (with the sunglasses on) maybe casing the place, surely there would have been dna there ?
    hi Paddy
    theres no DNA evidence?!? i thought they had some of an unknown male (although I could be wrong)? And this guy gave his DNA correct? so if there is DNA evidence from the scene they should be able to match to him, no?

    Leave a comment:


  • mpriestnall
    replied
    The 48 questions Kate is yet to answer...

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...swer--did.html

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X