Originally posted by FISHY1118
View Post
I’ll make you happy though Fishy as I think that I’ve about had enough of wasting time on this thread (btw it’s noticeable how virtually no one posted whilst I was away but now I’m back it’s ‘hey presto’ and here they are. Did they lose interest in the subject over the last couple of months or was it because they didn’t have me to have their little digs at?
It really is impossible to discuss this subject sensibly and I’m sorry to say that here, as is the general rule, it’s the fault of those that are obsessed with conspiracy. Sadly there’s more than an element of truth to that cartoon strip as anyone who has read Garrison will understand.
I wonder how ripper discussions would fare if they went like this - q. “what about the memorandum?” a. “forgery.” q. “what about Cadosch’s inquest testimony?” a. “faked.” q. how did the killer avoid police beats?” a. “what if he was psychic?” q. “what about Long seeing a woman that she said was Chapman?” a. “a planted imposter to confuse the police.”
These are the kinds of arguments and the standard of response that we have to put up with in this case. If it doesn’t fit a version of events scream ‘fake!’ or ‘forgery!’ It’s more than a little embarrassing and has infected the subject virtually from November 22nd 1963. And conspiracy theorists wonder why they get mocked world wide. The reason why the majority go for conspiracy is twofold. First, the majority of people just aren’t interested enough to examine the case properly and with reason, and second, conspiracy makes people feel cleverer. That they know something that mere mortals don’t. It’s a desperately sad state of affairs. Look at Trump, look anywhere in the world and read about the mad theories that abound that people swallow hook, line and sinker. We now even have to have books by serious people instructing people on how to cope with conspiracy theories with logic and reason. More people should read them.
There hasn’t been a single response to my properly researched post which debunks PI’s silly claim that Oswald couldn’t have killed Tippit within the time frame (as the police radio logs and other facts prove). Not a single comment on my properly researched debunking of the silly ‘wallet’ theory post or the even sillier Darryl Click post or the barking mad Roscoe White story that even the majority of other conspiracy theorists reject. Not one response on my rebuttal of George’s rather strange suggestion that shots could have come from the overpass when there were 11 men on there who saw and heard nothing (they were probably all CIA plants of course) No response from George on my proof that other people mention their being railway carriages in the area behind the picket fence. Something that he’s continually mocked as an avoidance tactic. No proper response from PI on the Parkland doctors where he claimed that they all backed up a shot from the front when they clearly didn’t (his tactic was to focus on one Doctor who altered his opinion in the light of new information.) And when a non-conspiracy witness changes his mind just after the event it’s a lie of course but when CT witnesses suddenly ‘remember’ something years later (or after speaking to Mark Lane) it’s perfectly fine! And never a comment on the long list of witness that CT’s rely who have been conclusively proven as liars. Too many to name here.
No meaningful response on why a group of high level conspirators would completely ignore a childishly obvious plan with almost no chance of failure and that would have left no trail of evidence in favour of the most complex plot in the history of the world involving hundreds of people and requiring fakes and forgeries, lookalikes that look nothing like the person that they’re supposed to look like, hundreds of corrupt officials, corrupt autopsies (whilst taking no precautions at all at Parkland of course) and a massive corrupt investigation with not one single, believable person letting anything slip or spilling the beans. Then there’s the sickening lie that Ruby wanted to speak about being part of a conspiracy when every single word printed by Ruby, without fail, proves the exact opposite….that he was desperate to prove that he wasn’t a part of a Jewish conspiracy. No sensible person would countenance this for a single second but we get excuse after excuse after excuse to justify this insanity. Not to mention of course the obvious question why they would place a gunman at the stupidest, easiest to discover location imaginable (the Knoll- which was directly in front of a Police car park would you believe) Not to mention their own magic bullet(s) which not only turn corners but vanish into thin air!
Then there was the release of documents which would undoubtedly prove conspiracy……..none found as we speak.
The alleged JFK ‘conspiracy’ is like a silly story written by a child which adults have looked at and tried to legitimise and then exaggerate with invented evidence and preposterous, unbelievable ideas. We can’t progress though. People are too deeply invested and ingrained in this silliness. The truth is obscured by an ever growing forest of more and more frantic imaginings,silliness and distortions. Its a case where proven liars like Mark Lane, Jim Garrison and Oliver Stone are raised close to sainthood by conspiracy enthusiasts and liars like Roger Craig and Beverly Oliver are trundled out as if they are Einstein at a physics conference. Just look at the bookshelves…look at the titles. Book after book of increasingly bizarre tosh. Unmitigated drivel.
Carry on….you’re welcome to it. You can be happy that you no longer have to make excuses for not answering the important questions. You can manipulate evidence, re-invent science and reconstruct logic, reason and common sense with contentment. It will make you feel good at least. Perhaps you can now look into the Loch Ness monster/alien angle.
Leave a comment: