JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year

[Herlock Sholmes]

People saw someone in the 6th floor window. How many saw a Grassy Knoll shouter? None. All of those people standing around and not one person saw this person (please don’t bother mentioning Badge Man or Lee Bower’s recital of his Mark Lane script) Why? I think that we all know.

[Herlock Sholmes]

The JFK head and neck wounds: the incongruities. MUST-SEE VIDEO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9v0rpOfwiE&ab_channel=VincePalamara

More evidence the Warren Commission faked the Autopsy photos of JFKs head .


All these people, according to the lone gunman gullible believers either lied , were mistaken , were stupid , never existed, and the brand new one to the list ''FALLIBLE ''!!!!!!!!!!


JUST CHECK OUT WHAT CLINT HILL SAYS AT 28.13 MIN IN . GAME OVER FOLKS , AND HE NEVER CHANGED HIS EYEWITHNESS ACCOUNT ..... EVER..., ''I WAS THERE ON THE DAY, IN THE LIMO''

Zapruder film…no rear head wound…it’s all there…cut and paste as much as you want Fishy…you can’t change it.

No back of the head wound.

[FISHY1118]

You don’t understand?

Have you seen the Zapruder film?

There is no huge back of the head wound. Or any visible back of the head wound.

Therefore there was no back of the head wound.

It’s there in colour. Couldn’t be clearer. Couldn’t be simpler. It ends the argument.

….

And Fishy, I see that your back to your usual tactic of dropping the word ‘insult’ into the conversation. To say that someone was mistaken isn’t an insult. So I’m only accusing Hill of being mistaken; you on the other hand are accusing many people of actually lying. So get off your invisible high horse and lose your fake outrage while all the time you are actually trying traduce so many people.

''Therefore there was no back of the head wound.''


YOUR WRONG HERLOCK , AND YOU KNOW IT . ILL REPEAT ..... ITS AN INSULT , THERE HAPPY ? 768 PAGES TO GO .

[Herlock Sholmes]

''Therefore there was no back of the head wound.''


YOUR WRONG HERLOCK , AND YOU KNOW IT . ILL REPEAT ..... ITS AN INSULT , THERE HAPPY ? 768 PAGES TO GO .

It’s not me that’s saying it Fishy.

Zapruder film…no large back of the head wound.

[FISHY1118]

Zapruder film…no rear head wound…it’s all there…cut and paste as much as you want Fishy…you can’t change it.

No back of the head wound.

Its called evidence herlock , which you obviously choose to ignore . The autopsy photo is fake , its proven to be fake and everyone but you knows it .

[Herlock Sholmes]

It’s called evidence herlock , which you obviously choose to ignore . The autopsy photo is fake , it’s proven to be fake and everyone but you knows it .

Zapruder film…no rear head wound

[Herlock Sholmes]

The JFK head and neck wounds: the incongruities. MUST-SEE VIDEO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9v0rpOfwiE&ab_channel=VincePalamara

More evidence the Warren Commission faked the Autopsy photos of JFKs head .


All these people, according to the lone gunman gullible believers either lied , were mistaken , were stupid , never existed, and the brand new one to the list ''FALLIBLE ''!!!!!!!!!!


JUST CHECK OUT WHAT CLINT HILL SAYS AT 28.13 MIN IN . GAME OVER FOLKS , AND HE NEVER CHANGED HIS EYEWITHNESS ACCOUNT ..... EVER..., ''I WAS THERE ON THE DAY, IN THE LIMO''

And what about these Parkland doctors Fishy?


Dr. Charles Baxter testified that the head exit wound was in the “temporal parietal” area.

Dr. Robert Grossman, the Neurosurgeon who accompanied Dr. William Kemp Clark into the trauma room said that the large defect he saw was “in the parietal area above the right ear.” Bugliosi, being an honest investigator, added that Grossman’s credibility on this matter might be questioned though. He elucidates in an endnote which is on the cd-Rom which accompanies his book which I don’t have the facility to read so I can’t explain further.

Dr. Adolphe Giesecke Jr testified that the exit wound extended from “ the brow line [ridge above the eye] to the occiput on the left (sic) hand side of the head.”

Dr. Marion T. Jenkins, anaesthesiologist, said he saw “a great laceration on the right side of the head (temporal and occipital)”

Dr. Kenneth Salyer said that the exit wound was in the “right temporal region.”

Dr. Donald Seldin, Chairman of the Department of Medicine, said that “ the entire frontal, parietal and temporal bones were shattered….I believe that the official story is accurate in all details.”


Would you please go on record and call these 6 doctors liars please.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Looks like Fishy has gone to phone Gil Jesus.

[FISHY1118]

And what about these Parkland doctors Fishy?


Dr. Charles Baxter testified that the head exit wound was in the “temporal parietal” area.

Dr. Robert Grossman, the Neurosurgeon who accompanied Dr. William Kemp Clark into the trauma room said that the large defect he saw was “in the parietal area above the right ear.” Bugliosi, being an honest investigator, added that Grossman’s credibility on this matter might be questioned though. He elucidates in an endnote which is on the cd-Rom which accompanies his book which I don’t have the facility to read so I can’t explain further.

Dr. Adolphe Giesecke Jr testified that the exit wound extended from “ the brow line [ridge above the eye] to the occiput on the left (sic) hand side of the head.”

Dr. Marion T. Jenkins, anaesthesiologist, said he saw “a great laceration on the right side of the head (temporal and occipital)”

Dr. Kenneth Salyer said that the exit wound was in the “right temporal region.”

Dr. Donald Seldin, Chairman of the Department of Medicine, said that “ the entire frontal, parietal and temporal bones were shattered….I believe that the official story is accurate in all details.”


Would you please go on record and call these 6 doctors liars please.

Would you please show ''evidence'' any of the above, on the assassination day ,in truama room 1 who saw and testified to the massive hole in back of JFKS HEAD ? ''not exit wounds ''

[FISHY1118]

Looks like Fishy has gone to phone Gil Jesus.

I see your trying to turn the thread to shite with your usual petty digs . It wont work . ''ACTUAL EVIDENCE'' always sort that out .

[FISHY1118]

Where did Oswald's 11 unfired rounds come from ? MORE ACTUAL EVIDENCE LIED ABOUT THE TIPPET MURDER



The Warren Commission was never able to determine where Oswald bought his .38 special ammunition. It claimed that he fired 4 and possibly 5 shots at J.D. Tippit and when he was arrested there were 6 unfired cartridges in the revolver and another 5 unfired cartridges were later found in his pants pocket at about 4pm.

There may have been a reason why they could find anyone who had sold Oswald the ammunition: he never owned any.

So where did the 11 unfired rounds attributed to him come from ?

At 3: 30 pm, 11 unfired rounds were turned in to the police station. They had been recovered from the possessions of Officer J.D. Tippit.





The "3 live .38 rounds" mentioned in this report was wrong as the below report shows. The "3" is crossed out. There were 11 recovered from Tippit's possessions.



When there is a discrepancy, sworn testimony always trumps written reports. Testimony given under oath and under the penalty of perjury is always more credible. In that regard, Sgt. Hill never turned the weapon or the cartridges over to Lt. Baker at 3:15 pm. When under oath, Hill testified that at "approximately 4pm", he marked the six shells "from the revolver" in Westbrook's office.



They brought Oswald into the police station around 2:15 pm. If the cartridges had truly come from the revolver, there was no reason to wait an hour or more to unload the weapon and mark them. Marking them should have been the first thing Hill did when he unloaded the weapon. That is, of course, if the weapon wasn't empty. If they tried to plant an empty revolver on Oswald at the Texas Theater, they would have needed cartridges after the arrest to make it look like the weapon was loaded all along. If they didn't have those readily available, they would have needed to wait until they got some.

Hence, the Tippit cartridges.

Also, Hill's marking of the cartridges was around the same time Det. Boyd "found" the remaining five unfired rounds in Oswald's pants pocket on the way to the 4:05 line up. This "discovery" was made after Oswald had been thoroughly searched twice by Det. Bentley and again by Off. Walker.







Again, the marking of the six rounds and the "discovery of another five rounds in Oswald's pocket" was 30 minutes after the 11 unfired rounds recovered from Tippit were in the building.

Could those 11 Tippit cartridges have been the source of the 11 cartridges attributed to Oswald ?

The number and type of cartridges is right. The timing is right.

And there is a problem with officers who handled the evidence never being called to testify.

The fact that Bentley, Doughty, Davenport, Bardin and Baker were never called to testify regarding the search, the number and the possession of the unfired rounds leaves wide open the door that the evidence was planted by the Dallas Police.

Five officers who handled evidence who were never called.

One is an oversight, not five.

But there's more to indicate a police source to these cartridges.

The corrosion of the casing on the cartridges indicates that they had been in a gunbelt or a bullet slide for a long time.





Having had the experience with these things, I've always suspected that the source of these cartridges was a police source.

Then there's the question of how Oswald, who had little experience with handguns, would have known that the .38 revolver he ordered had been rechambered and could only fire .38 special ammunition.

I know this will cause those on the "Oswald-did-it" side some angst, but one thing I'm sure of, the evidence indicates that:

The six unfired rounds that were "in the revolver" and five that were "found" in Oswald's pants pocket were the same 11 cartridges that came from the personal effects recovered from J.D. Tippit.

Too many coincidences and too many witnesses ignored.

[FISHY1118]

Secret Service agents Winston Lawson and Clint Hill on the JFK head wound

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrjWhiKBa4M&t=33s&ab_channel=VincePalamara

THANK YOU Winston Lawson for exposing the Warren Commission Lie , Some , who hadnt even taken their first breath on this planet are more than happy to call you a liar , your stupid , your mistaken, you never existed , and now your fallible as an eyewitness .

[Herlock Sholmes]

I see your trying to turn the thread to shite with your usual petty digs . It wont work . ''ACTUAL EVIDENCE'' always sort that out .

Like the Zapruder film which proves categorically, in colour, that there was no large rear of the head wound.

[GBinOz]

The JFK head and neck wounds: the incongruities. MUST-SEE VIDEO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9v0rpOfwiE&ab_channel=VincePalamara

More evidence the Warren Commission faked the Autopsy photos of JFKs head .


All these people, according to the lone gunman gullible believers either lied , were mistaken , were stupid , never existed, and the brand new one to the list ''FALLIBLE ''!!!!!!!!!!


JUST CHECK OUT WHAT CLINT HILL SAYS AT 28.13 MIN IN . GAME OVER FOLKS , AND HE NEVER CHANGED HIS EYEWITHNESS ACCOUNT ..... EVER..., ''I WAS THERE ON THE DAY, IN THE LIMO''

Thanks for the link Fishy. I was impressed by the knowledge and common sense displayed by the Willis family (who were actually there taking photos) at around the 33 minute mark, and Crenshaw's comments in the last minute.

I suppose you have seen this video, but just in case:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_QIuu6hsAc&t=3596s&ab_channel=e2films

Brugioni strikes me as a man of integrity and character.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Would you please show ''evidence'' any of the above, on the assassination day ,in truama room 1 who saw and testified to the massive hole in back of JFKS HEAD ? ''not exit wounds ''

As ever your posting becomes slightly confusing when you get angry Fishy so I’m having difficulty understanding this one I’m afraid.

The doctors in my post all saw Kennedy at Parkland and they all said that the wound was on the side of his head. So we are in a situation where we have a majority saying back of the head and a minority saying side of the head.

So…if you believe that the majority should take precedence ‘as a rule’ then obviously you would have to be consistent and fair with that rule. What I mean is that you wouldn’t only apply it when it suits you would you Fishy? Of course you wouldn't. So with that in mind you would also side with the majority of witnesses who said that they only heard three shots. And you would also side with the majority of witnesses who believed that the shots came from the direction of Dealey Plaza? And while we’re on the subject of ‘going with the majority’ you would have to accept of course the large majority of witnesses who positively identified Lee Harvey Oswald as the killer of JD Tippit.

Just being fair of course Fishy