Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Limerick, the Key?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Debra A
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Caroline. Or perhaps the story was the result of collusion?

    Cheers.
    LC
    Hi Lynn. Can I ask? Do you think Barnett would have been part of this collusion or an innocent party who just relayed what had been told to him by MJK?

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    new idea

    Hello (again) Ruby.

    "we have to keep coming up with different ideas"

    Very well, I'm game.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    collusion

    Hello Caroline. Or perhaps the story was the result of collusion?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    family

    Hello Ruby.

    "I think that the idea that they could write to her, but she couldn't write to them ( because they didn't have a fixed address) is a good one."

    No problem. But would it keep them from here funeral?

    "Those friends actually had Scottish roots (I will have to find out more). There might be something that explains the 'Scots Guards'. A 'tradition' somewhere?

    Perhaps. But Debs and Colin have already had a go there.

    "The name 'Mary' however points to Catholics (but wouldn't that narrow down things in Ulster ?)"

    Possibly.

    "Am I remembering wrong, but didn't she say that her Father worked in the Mine?"

    Ironworks, if I recall properly.

    "Maybe the family were split up (maybe her parents were of different religions, and so were the offspring ?) and spread around."

    Could be.

    "Or she didn't have her Father's name."

    Well, Joseph Barnett at inquest said his name was "John Kelly."

    Care to try the obvious?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    simply irresistable

    Hello Dave. Ah, but my suggestions may prove irresistable.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Rubyretro
    replied
    . She could have given him names and ages for all of them, assuming they existed outside of her imagination and she didn't lose touch with any at an early age. But apparently Barnett didn't ask, or she wasn't that talkative.

    Or maybe she chatted away about them so much (when she wasn't singing for her supper) that he turned a deaf'un.
    My guess is, Caz, that they did an awful lot of talking...without the telly nor different rooms nor computers nor 'phones to distract them, I bet you that they had more communication than many couples have today.

    ...but he is quoted on very little/those things wouldn't be seen as important by the Police to beqeath to History/the information was destroyed or lost..

    ..As you say, he might just have been an uninterested and insensitive man who "turned a deaf'un". I'm not sure that he comes over as that ; There is nothing that I've ever read about him that makes him come over as unsympathetic -to the contrary, in fact.

    None of that helps us find her now though..so we have to keep coming up with different ideas

    Leave a comment:


  • caz
    replied
    Well, Barnett was either not particularly inquisitive about his live-in lover's childhood, parents and siblings, or she only volunteered the bits that she wanted him to know. She could have given him names and ages for all of them, assuming they existed outside of her imagination and she didn't lose touch with any at an early age. But apparently Barnett didn't ask, or she wasn't that talkative.

    Or maybe she chatted away about them so much (when she wasn't singing for her supper) that he turned a deaf'un.

    Love,

    Caz
    X

    Leave a comment:


  • Rubyretro
    replied
    something along the lines of MJK being the daughter of an itinerant family, so birth not registered, no census entries, that sort of thing. Perhaps they wrote to her, but she couldn't write back.
    I freely admit that I haven't time to read back over the whole thread, and so I don't know if this has already been mooted, but wasn't Mary's sister supposed to sell on markets ?

    Jobs often run in families -Mary's sister might have started accompanying one or both parents to markets as a child and then branched out on her own for example.

    It would depend on what the family were selling, and if they would need to move around to go to specialist 'fairs'...That might explain children born in different places between Ireland, Wales and England.

    What about linen, or other finished goods, from Ulster ? Glass ?

    Maybe Ulster is the key, and not Limerick at all, if we're looking at import/export for this period ?

    A very brief look at Ulster in the 1880s threw up the name 'Kellett'...so maybe the real name wasn't actually Kelly at all, but a close variation ?

    I think that the idea that they could write to her, but she couldn't write to them ( because they didn't have a fixed address) is a good one.

    I certainly have a couple of very good friends who are tall and ginger blond from Ulster -so the physical type fits.

    Those friends actually had Scottish roots (I will have to find out more). There might be something that explains the 'Scots Guards'. A 'tradition' somewhere ?

    The name 'Mary' however points to Catholics (but wouldn't that narrow down things in Ulster ? )

    Am I remembering wrong, but didn't she say that her Father worked in the Mine ? Maybe the family were split up (maybe her parents were of different religions, and so were the offspring ? )and spread around. Or she didn't have her Father's name. Or his fixed employment was terribly brief.

    just thinking aloud...

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    I was (perhaps obtusely) resisting that suggestion Lynn!

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    agitating ze little grey cells

    Hello Colin. Thanks.

    "It does seem strange that McCarthy was able to state that the letters for her used to come from "some part of Ireland" but that he couldn't be more precise."

    But suppose for a moment that:

    1. There were letters.

    2. They were from Ireland.

    3. They were NOT from family.

    What then?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    "'E used sarcasm. Oh, 'e knew all the tricks."

    Hello Dave. Right. And she feared Doug's sarcasm.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    Ah philately again!

    It does seem strange that McCarthy was able to state that the letters for her used to come from "some part of Ireland" but that he couldn't be more precise.
    Hi Colin

    Well let's be honest, unless he saw a full "CDS" postmark on an envelope, (unlike the far more common dumb "killer" postmark) he'd not be likely to be able to repeat any more than MJK told him...

    All the best

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    Hi Dave & Lynn,

    I'm still reluctant to rule out the possibility of a true identity, but a false life history - something along the lines of MJK being the daughter of an itinerant family, so birth not registered, no census entries, that sort of thing. Perhaps they wrote to her, but she couldn't write back. It does seem strange that McCarthy was able to state that the letters for her used to come from "some part of Ireland" but that he couldn't be more precise.

    Regards, Bridewell.
    Last edited by Bridewell; 05-15-2012, 08:22 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    Hi Lynn

    I'm sure you're going to tell me she was really Dinsdale in hiding from Spiney Norman! (Aka Red Jim?)

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Por que?

    Hello Dave. False identity indeed.

    Now, the big question--Why?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:

Working...