Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How Many Victims Were There?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sleuth1888
    replied
    I would say Tabram plus the C5. This is because I believe the dates of the murders are too similar to suggest different killers. 7, 8, 9 and 30/31. This suggests a killer who was free at these times to kill.

    I also think he must have been busy or unable to go out on other days as the killings always occur at the start or end of the month.
    It's a big coincidence that if he went prowling every night he only killed on the 7th/8th or 30th/31st of a month...

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael W Richards
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    Hey Abby. Good points but I wanted to address this in particular:



    It's not so much the MO but the post-mortem signature that I'm interested in. With Nichols we can see where his interests lay but he didn't have the confidence or whatever to excise the organs. After getting away with that one, he grew bolder and more violent. I already think he may have killed some of the Torso victims at that stage, so the frenzied stabbing would be out of place for a guy whose signature was removing organs and body parts.

    I can understand the attraction of plotting a neat little trajectory of the killer's escalation but Whitechapel was no stranger to violent crimes, and not all serial killers fit that mold. Some indeed do emerge with mo and signatures fully formed or close enough.
    Your last line is Harry is a belief I share, and its very evident within the known Canonical Group. To suggest a broader one is where I disagree. There are 2 murders that so closely resemble each other in all the relevant categories, and that have that escalation you mention. I am satisfied with pairing them by killer based on the known evidence, and I feel that there are asterixis on a few remaining Canonicals. Polly and Annie almost certainly met their death by the same hand, in the same manner, and with the same methods. The escalation seen in the latter murder can be attributed to a more suitable venue for extending time with the dead woman.

    Polly and Annie met someone who posed as a character, a client, and when they led him into the darkness, he struck quickly. That they looked very similar, and both were less than physically well at the time, one ill.. one drunk, may be significant in his choice for a target as well. And these 2 murders were the first 2 in the alleged series, the hysteria began after Annie. He was still able to pull of his masquerade at that time, but later in September Im sure most street women were either working less, in groups, or working more alertly. It would have been harder for him as stranger to them to get them to do what he hoped they would. The stranger factor is another key component here I think...I don't believe Jack the Ripper knew his victims. I do believe one or more of the Canonicals did know him.

    Its, as you put it, an "mo and signature fully formed".

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by APerno View Post

    LOL did she get it away with it? Fiancee, heh, lucky him, he missed out on the chance to fall asleep next to her.
    No she got 14 years. I remember when the story broke in ‘96. She claimed that a guy had attacked her boyfriend in a road rage incident but from the start people were suspicious of her. Apparently she was released in 2011 and got married in 2017. I wonder what he thinks if they have an argument?

    Leave a comment:


  • APerno
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    It is a good point APerno but Tracie Andrews famously stabbed her fiancée Lee Harvey 42 times with a pen knife after an argument which she tried to blame on a road rage attack. As far as I know, and I’ll certainly stand correcting on this one, there was no suggestion of any underlying mental issues?
    LOL did she get it away with it? Fiancee, heh, lucky him, he missed out on the chance to fall asleep next to her.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by APerno View Post

    IMHO, a drunken rage results in three to five blows, with the knife, max. By then Tabram would have been hurt enough to satisfy his rage. 39 blows, is more than rage, it is a mental illness. I have tried to visualize the act, and I can't see him making it through that many blows without having to take several breaths. Even a prize fighter can't throw 40 blows consecutively; he had to have stopped and started again several times; just can't see it as a single act of rage.

    I am not saying it wasn't a pissed off punter that night, but whoever he was his act was beyond rage.
    It is a good point APerno but Tracie Andrews famously stabbed her fiancée Lee Harvey 42 times with a pen knife after an argument which she tried to blame on a road rage attack. As far as I know, and I’ll certainly stand correcting on this one, there was no suggestion of any underlying mental issues?

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    Originally posted by APerno View Post

    IMHO, a drunken rage results in three to five blows, with the knife, max. By then Tabram would have been hurt enough to satisfy his rage. 39 blows, is more than rage, it is a mental illness. I have tried to visualize the act, and I can't see him making it through that many blows without having to take several breaths. Even a prize fighter can't throw 40 blows consecutively; he had to have stopped and started again several times; just can't see it as a single act of rage.

    I am not saying it wasn't a pissed off punter that night, but whoever he was his act was beyond rage.
    This is a good point.

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    Hey Abby. Good points but I wanted to address this in particular:



    It's not so much the MO but the post-mortem signature that I'm interested in. With Nichols we can see where his interests lay but he didn't have the confidence or whatever to excise the organs. After getting away with that one, he grew bolder and more violent. I already think he may have killed some of the Torso victims at that stage, so the frenzied stabbing would be out of place for a guy whose signature was removing organs and body parts.

    I can understand the attraction of plotting a neat little trajectory of the killer's escalation but Whitechapel was no stranger to violent crimes, and not all serial killers fit that mold. Some indeed do emerge with mo and signatures fully formed or close enough.
    hi harry
    this is why i think you are one of the most smart and level headed posters on this site. as you know i also favor the torsos as by the same killer. and you sussed out my main problem and which ive struggled with of including tabram and millwood in the series if torsoman and the ripper were the same because of the reasons youve pointed out. i could only offer that since these were torso rippers first street kills he was learning how to do them, as opposed to easier chop shop kills. but i totally see your point and you very well may be right.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by APerno View Post

    IMHO, a drunken rage results in three to five blows, with the knife, max. By then Tabram would have been hurt enough to satisfy his rage. 39 blows, is more than rage, it is a mental illness. I have tried to visualize the act, and I can't see him making it through that many blows without having to take several breaths. Even a prize fighter can't throw 40 blows consecutively; he had to have stopped and started again several times; just can't see it as a single act of rage.

    I am not saying it wasn't a pissed off punter that night, but whoever he was his act was beyond rage.
    bingo. and nice point the killer having to actually stop at some point do to the number of blows. totally agree. and at which point the typical pissed off punter would have fled.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Hey Abby. Good points but I wanted to address this in particular:

    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    and if you don't see her as a precurser-whats the alternative? That with Nichols the rippers MO springs fully formed? I would posit millwood and tabram was his "learning" phase.
    It's not so much the MO but the post-mortem signature that I'm interested in. With Nichols we can see where his interests lay but he didn't have the confidence or whatever to excise the organs. After getting away with that one, he grew bolder and more violent. I already think he may have killed some of the Torso victims at that stage, so the frenzied stabbing would be out of place for a guy whose signature was removing organs and body parts.

    I can understand the attraction of plotting a neat little trajectory of the killer's escalation but Whitechapel was no stranger to violent crimes, and not all serial killers fit that mold. Some indeed do emerge with mo and signatures fully formed or close enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • APerno
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry D View Post

    As you can see, I'm fairly liberal with my estimate but left out Tabram. I've never been convinced. She's the one murder that I can see as an occupational hazard. I don't see the killer going from frenzied stabbing at the upper body to methodical abdominal slicing in a few weeks. Martha probably pissed off the wrong punter.
    IMHO, a drunken rage results in three to five blows, with the knife, max. By then Tabram would have been hurt enough to satisfy his rage. 39 blows, is more than rage, it is a mental illness. I have tried to visualize the act, and I can't see him making it through that many blows without having to take several breaths. Even a prize fighter can't throw 40 blows consecutively; he had to have stopped and started again several times; just can't see it as a single act of rage.

    I am not saying it wasn't a pissed off punter that night, but whoever he was his act was beyond rage.

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    Not really.

    Whitehall barely rates a maybe due to locality.

    Doctors not reliable.

    Leave a comment:


  • jerryd
    replied
    Originally posted by DJA View Post
    I'd split the torsos.

    Whitehall is my only maybea.
    Hi Dave,

    As you know, the doctors indicated four of the torsos seem to have been dissected by the same hand, which included the Whitehall victim. If Whitehall is a maybe for you, wouldn't the other 3 be a maybe as well?
    Last edited by jerryd; 08-02-2019, 07:43 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    Originally posted by John G View Post

    See my reply above.
    Premature Jack calculation

    Try saying that really fast a few times
    Last edited by DJA; 08-02-2019, 07:45 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • jerryd
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post

    hi Jerry!
    Very interesting find! Where is this from and is there any corroborating evidence for this apparent murder?
    Hi Abby. It was from a US source. At the time I found this, I remember reading another account of a woman leaving a tavern near Mitre Square near the same time frame and was murdered under similar circumstances. For the life of me, I can't find it now.

    I posted this clip on JTRforums years ago and some thought it may have been the source for the Fairy Fay story.

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    I'd split the torsos.

    Whitehall is my only maybea.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X