Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How Many Victims Were There?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • John G
    replied
    Nichols, Chapman, Eddowes close to 100%. Stride 40-50%, Kelly 90% plus. Torso victims, zero to 0.5%. Tabram, 50-60%. Mackenzie, around 20%. Coles, 10%. Smith, 10%.
    Last edited by John G; 07-25-2019, 03:16 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
    It would be interest for me to gauge opinion on how many actual victims (murders) there were that each poster attributes to Jack the Ripper. I intended to do it as a poll but I decided against it as there were so many combinations for eg c5 + Tabram or c5 + Tabram and Mackenzie or c5 + Mackenzie.

    I’ll suggest the term c4 to denote the c5 minus Stride?

    Even without the poll format we’ll be able to get a feel for what posters think. This thread isn’t really for comments or debate just the presentation of your opinions although it would be ok for you to add your level of likeliness if you feel it’s important.

    Ill begin.

    I go for the c5

    (with Tabram and Mackenzie accepted as possibles.) At a guess I’d say 25% Tabram, 30-40% Mackenzie.
    3 Nichols.chapman.Eddowes

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger
    replied
    Canonical Five, and probably Martha Tabram as well. I'd not be at all surprised to learn that Annie Millwood was a victim of the Ripper also. I have trouble imagining that he started out murdering women right off the bat. We see an escalating series of horrors from Polly Nichols up to Mary Kelly (excepting Elizabeth Stride, but I think he didn't get to finish what he'd begun there). It seems sensible to me that his earliest crimes would have been part of that pattern of ever-increasing violence.
    Last edited by Ginger; 07-25-2019, 02:43 PM. Reason: Rephrasing

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Thanks for the responses. I’ll give it a week or so to get a better overall picture.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    AT LEAST ten victims...

    Rainham torso
    Nichols
    Whitehall torso
    Chapman
    Stride
    Eddowes
    Kelly
    Jackson
    McKenzie
    Pinchin torso
    agree with this. but if ripper was separate from torso (i doubt)then c7-add tabram and McKenzie to c5.

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael W Richards
    replied
    C2, possibly 3. Remove Liz and Mary. Circumstances in both cases suggest other possible motives than just a compulsion for murder and mutilation.

    If 2 is correct, then an explanation for why they stopped with Annie is present within the known "suspects" files. In fact the suspect later ID'd from an appearance at the pub down the street from the Hanbury murder scene on the morning of the murder is a likely prospect. The means, the skills, the institutionalization between C2 and C3 murders ending the series...it could fit. People who think that only Jack killed street women during this period should look closer at the Torsos, or the other 8 or so Unsolved murders, which suggest multiple men doing violent acts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kattrup
    replied
    C5 (fillertext)

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    AT LEAST ten victims...

    Rainham torso
    Nichols
    Whitehall torso
    Chapman
    Stride
    Eddowes
    Kelly
    Jackson
    McKenzie
    Pinchin torso

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    Five.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    started a topic How Many Victims Were There?

    How Many Victims Were There?

    It would be interest for me to gauge opinion on how many actual victims (murders) there were that each poster attributes to Jack the Ripper. I intended to do it as a poll but I decided against it as there were so many combinations for eg c5 + Tabram or c5 + Tabram and Mackenzie or c5 + Mackenzie.

    I’ll suggest the term c4 to denote the c5 minus Stride?

    Even without the poll format we’ll be able to get a feel for what posters think. This thread isn’t really for comments or debate just the presentation of your opinions although it would be ok for you to add your level of likeliness if you feel it’s important.

    Ill begin.

    I go for the c5

    (with Tabram and Mackenzie accepted as possibles.) At a guess I’d say 25% Tabram, 30-40% Mackenzie.
Working...
X