Am I really the only one who doesn't think the marks on Liz Stride were bruises?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Stride Bruising
Collapse
X
-
Hullo Errata!
Originally posted by Errata View PostAm I really the only one who doesn't think the marks on Liz Stride were bruises?Valour pleases Crom.
Comment
-
One version has "footpath" if I recall properly.
"That could account for the lack of mud."
perhaps. But what of the wetness?
Cheers.
LC[/QUOTE]
Well if it was the pavement then it may have simply not been wet. Which would indicate a two staged assault or two seperate incidents. Also, I enjoyed your demonstration. Great moustache! Interesting scenario too!Valour pleases Crom.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Errata View PostAm I really the only one who doesn't think the marks on Liz Stride were bruises?
Ok, is this the exchange you might have in mind?
"The Foreman: Did you notice any marks or bruises about the shoulders? - They were what we call pressure marks. At first they were very obscure, but subsequently they became very evident. They were not what are ordinarily called bruises; neither is there any abrasion. Each shoulder was about equally marked."
Not what are ordinarily called bruises?Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostI vaguely recall you mentioning this before.
Ok, is this the exchange you might have in mind?
"The Foreman: Did you notice any marks or bruises about the shoulders? - They were what we call pressure marks. At first they were very obscure, but subsequently they became very evident. They were not what are ordinarily called bruises; neither is there any abrasion. Each shoulder was about equally marked."
Not what are ordinarily called bruises?The early bird might get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
Comment
-
Valid reason
Originally posted by Digalittledeeperwatson View PostHis statement said that BSM threw her on the pavement. That could account for the lack of mud. I'm personally becoming more skeptical of Schwartz. But I'm not willing to disregard him yet. More data is needed. He provides a reasonable enough explanation. It's just not quite enough to take it as gospel. Your point being one of many to consider.
Schwarz did have a perfectly valid reason for being on Berner street that night. He wanted to check if his wife had managed to move from Berner street to Backchurch lane. Presumably the police would have checked to see if this was true.
Best wishes,
C4
Comment
-
Hullo C4!
To be oppositional for it's sake, apparently ONLY Schwartz's wife could have corroborated his story as no one else saw him. And she would of had cause to be bias. Like I said, I'm not willing to throw his account to the wind, nor shall I accept it blindly. Maybe Schwartz murdered Stride for all we know. If he was even there that is. Ooo, Death Telepathy. Apologies, sounds cool currently.Valour pleases Crom.
Comment
-
Trust no one
Originally posted by DVV View PostPoor Schwartz.
Brave enough to confess how cowardly he ran.
He really should be trusted.Valour pleases Crom.
Comment
-
Hello
Originally posted by Digalittledeeperwatson View PostNow if he saw the murder occur why would he not have relayec that information..
Have you seen the murder of Meredith Hunter by Hells Angels at the Rolling Stones gig at Altamont. At first look it appears like some kind of scuffle but in reality he was been stabbed.
Originally posted by Digalittledeeperwatson View PostAlso why delay in reporting the incident?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jon Guy View PostHello
Was there a delay in reporting what he`d seen? He went to the Police station to make a statement on the Sunday afternoon.Last edited by Digalittledeeperwatson; 05-10-2013, 10:09 AM.Valour pleases Crom.
Comment
Comment