Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Evidence of innocence

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    I beleive most lawyers-either defense or prosecution are paid for there services lol. so I guess theyre all biased
    The bastards!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

      so what evidence do we have today that wasn’t available to the police in 1888?

      www.trevormarriott.co.uk
      I said on the 3rd of September, Trevor. Do keep up!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post

        No it wasn’t.

        Thanks, Gary. We’ ll let him do the research himself, shall we?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Fisherman View Post
          How about the rest out here, does anyone think that it is an established fact that Paul told Mizen that he thought that Nichols was dead?
          It is an established fact that Robert Paul claimed that he told PC Mizen that Nichols was dead.
          It is an established fact that Charles Allen Lechmere claimed that Robert Paul told PC Mizen that Nichols was dead.

          These two witnesses did not know each other. They had no reason to lie about this, let alone to lie for each other.
          "The full picture always needs to be given. When this does not happen, we are left to make decisions on insufficient information." - Christer Holmgren

          "Unfortunately, when one becomes obsessed by a theory, truth and logic rarely matter." - Steven Blomer

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Mark J D View Post
            A married, caucasian male with a steady job was already close to the bottom of the police's 'possible suspect' list; add in an obvious physical impairment or two, and he's a man who will not be suspected of nothing,
            Still waiting for you to provide evidence that CAL had "an obvious physical impairment or two".

            And explain how a man who had "an obvious physical impairment or two" could perform the job of carman.

            And explain how a man who had "an obvious physical impairment or two" could keep pace with Robert Paul, a man nearly a decade younger, as they walked together from the murder site to Paul's workplace near Spitalfield's Market?

            And explain how this "obvious physical impairment or two" weren't obvious enough to be mentioned by anyone who saw CAL.

            And explain how a man who had "an obvious physical impairment or two" does not match the description of anyone seen near any of the murder victims near their times of death.


            "The full picture always needs to be given. When this does not happen, we are left to make decisions on insufficient information." - Christer Holmgren

            "Unfortunately, when one becomes obsessed by a theory, truth and logic rarely matter." - Steven Blomer

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Fisherman View Post
              All that has happened is that James Scobie has said that there is a prima facie case against him, and that basically means that on the face of things, the evidence involved would warrant a trial that suggests that the carman was guilty.
              Again, you ignore that Scobie was given the accusatory evidence, not the exculpatory evidence.

              Or as I've put it before - "Garbage in, garbage out".

              "The full picture always needs to be given. When this does not happen, we are left to make decisions on insufficient information." - Christer Holmgren

              "Unfortunately, when one becomes obsessed by a theory, truth and logic rarely matter." - Steven Blomer

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Greenway View Post

                I prefer to give original sources in full - it allows people to judge the context for themselves.

                All the best.
                It seems that James Scobie QC also found himself unwittingly referenced in an entirely different rapper's video--a former client known as "Snap Capone," charged with beating a man to death at a petrol station, using a builder's whisk. The jury accepted the argument of self-defense and 'Capone,' who evidently has quite a following in the music world, was acquitted.

                If you don't want to wade through all the gangland posturing, it's at the 8:20 mark. "A finger up to the police, a big shout-out to James Scobie."

                (4) Snap Capone | Warm Up Sessions [S6.EP33]: SBTV - YouTube

                It would seem strange that two different rappers would praise Scobie's legal acumen, but evidently Scobie has carved himself a niche as the 'go to silk' when it comes to defending gangsta rappers against murder and drug-dealing charges. Besides Trapstar Toxic and Snap Capone, other former clients include 'Incog,' Jet Black, and 'Mover' (who despite Scobie's best efforts, was convicted of stabbing a man to death during a botched mugging).

                I was reading about one of Scobie's 2014 trials. He chose the strange legal strategy of telling the jury that his client, Yassin James, aged 19, was a "low-life toe rag" but "not a killer."

                The jury didn't accept Scobie's defense and James was duly convicted of murder and is now in HMP Belmarsh, not eligible for release until he serves 37 years. He and his accomplices used a sawed-off shotgun and a machine gun in an attempt to kill rival gang members, but instead shot two innocent bystanders, killing a nursery school teacher who was also the mother of a small child.

                Of course, even gangstas have the right to legal council, but Scobie seems to have found a peculiar niche, and no doubt a lucrative one--defending 'gangsta' rappers. He's not hiding it--his law firm advertises these 'successes' on their website.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post

                  It seems that James Scobie QC also found himself unwittingly referenced in an entirely different rapper's video--a former client known as "Snap Capone," charged with beating a man to death at a petrol station, using a builder's whisk. The jury accepted the argument of self-defense and 'Capone,' who evidently has quite a following in the music world, was acquitted.

                  If you don't want to wade through all the gangland posturing, it's at the 8:20 mark. "A finger up to the police, a big shout-out to James Scobie."

                  (4) Snap Capone | Warm Up Sessions [S6.EP33]: SBTV - YouTube

                  It would seem strange that two different rappers would praise Scobie's legal acumen, but evidently Scobie has carved himself a niche as the 'go to silk' when it comes to defending gangsta rappers against murder and drug-dealing charges. Besides Trapstar Toxic and Snap Capone, other former clients include 'Incog,' Jet Black, and 'Mover' (who despite Scobie's best efforts, was convicted of stabbing a man to death during a botched mugging).

                  I was reading about one of Scobie's 2014 trials. He chose the strange legal strategy of telling the jury that his client, Yassin James, aged 19, was a "low-life toe rag" but "not a killer."

                  The jury didn't accept Scobie's defense and James was duly convicted of murder and is now in HMP Belmarsh, not eligible for release until he serves 37 years. He and his accomplices used a sawed-off shotgun and a machine gun in an attempt to kill rival gang members, but instead shot two innocent bystanders, killing a nursery school teacher who was also the mother of a small child.

                  Of course, even gangstas have the right to legal council, but Scobie seems to have found a peculiar niche, and no doubt a lucrative one--defending 'gangsta' rappers. He's not hiding it--his law firm advertises these 'successes' on their website.
                  Hi RJ
                  He has also represented the notorious Adams family from London and at least one of the lorry drivers involved in the death of 39 Chinese migrants recently.
                  Regards Darryl

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Greenway View Post

                    He features in this 'Grime' (urban popular music) video (about 3 minutes in):

                    ▶ SUBSCRIBE: http://bit.ly/GRMsubscribe ▶ VISIT: http://grmdaily.com/▶ DOWNLOAD THE GRM APP FOR iPHONE & iPAD NOW: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/grm-daily...


                    It is starting to look like he'll do anything to be famous.

                    All the best.
                    I imagine it was a little embarrassing for Scobie when this video later showed up in court as evidence of his former client's drug-dealing ways.


                    Rap star jailed after music video bragging about drug dealing (thelondoneconomic.com)

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post

                      It seems that James Scobie QC also found himself unwittingly referenced in an entirely different rapper's video--a former client known as "Snap Capone," charged with beating a man to death at a petrol station, using a builder's whisk. The jury accepted the argument of self-defense and 'Capone,' who evidently has quite a following in the music world, was acquitted.

                      If you don't want to wade through all the gangland posturing, it's at the 8:20 mark. "A finger up to the police, a big shout-out to James Scobie."

                      (4) Snap Capone | Warm Up Sessions [S6.EP33]: SBTV - YouTube

                      It would seem strange that two different rappers would praise Scobie's legal acumen, but evidently Scobie has carved himself a niche as the 'go to silk' when it comes to defending gangsta rappers against murder and drug-dealing charges. Besides Trapstar Toxic and Snap Capone, other former clients include 'Incog,' Jet Black, and 'Mover' (who despite Scobie's best efforts, was convicted of stabbing a man to death during a botched mugging).

                      I was reading about one of Scobie's 2014 trials. He chose the strange legal strategy of telling the jury that his client, Yassin James, aged 19, was a "low-life toe rag" but "not a killer."

                      The jury didn't accept Scobie's defense and James was duly convicted of murder and is now in HMP Belmarsh, not eligible for release until he serves 37 years. He and his accomplices used a sawed-off shotgun and a machine gun in an attempt to kill rival gang members, but instead shot two innocent bystanders, killing a nursery school teacher who was also the mother of a small child.

                      Of course, even gangstas have the right to legal council, but Scobie seems to have found a peculiar niche, and no doubt a lucrative one--defending 'gangsta' rappers. He's not hiding it--his law firm advertises these 'successes' on their website.
                      the ole lech was innocent because a modern day lawyer who thinks theres enough circumstantial evidence to charge has rappers as clients defense! LOL. this really is spinning down the rabbit hole. talking about this nonsense for several pages and not one anti-lecher has congratulated or even mentioned Garys steller research on the pinchin/cats meat shop find. and one wonders why I im a lech apologist at best and an anti-anti-lecher? go figure.
                      "Is all that we see or seem
                      but a dream within a dream?"

                      -Edgar Allan Poe


                      "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                      quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

                      -Frederick G. Abberline

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Darryl Kenyon View Post

                        Hi RJ
                        He has also represented the notorious Adams family from London and at least one of the lorry drivers involved in the death of 39 Chinese migrants recently.
                        Regards Darryl
                        Thanks, Darryl. One wonders how he finds the time to prosecute dangerous criminals like CAL, when he's so busy keeping these innocent folks out of prison.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post

                          the ole lech was innocent because a modern day lawyer who thinks theres enough circumstantial evidence to charge has rappers as clients defense! LOL. this really is spinning down the rabbit hole. talking about this nonsense for several pages and not one anti-lecher has congratulated or even mentioned Garys steller research on the pinchin/cats meat shop find. and one wonders why I im a lech apologist at best and an anti-anti-lecher? go figure.
                          Congratulations, Gary.



                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post

                            Thanks, Darryl. One wonders how he finds the time to prosecute dangerous criminals like CAL, when he's so busy keeping these innocent folks out of prison.
                            god forbid anyone should have right of legal representation. And another log on the police are infallable fire? haha
                            "Is all that we see or seem
                            but a dream within a dream?"

                            -Edgar Allan Poe


                            "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                            quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

                            -Frederick G. Abberline

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post

                              Congratulations, Gary.


                              LOL! Ill take it-very gracious of you RJ! : )
                              "Is all that we see or seem
                              but a dream within a dream?"

                              -Edgar Allan Poe


                              "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                              quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

                              -Frederick G. Abberline

                              Comment


                              • Me, I am wondering why it is that R J has the time to research every case Scobie has handled, but no time to answer my two questions.

                                Abby is spot on when speaking of the ripperological rabbit hole. But its the first time I’ ve seen a grizzly-sized rabbit…

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X