Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

change in modus operandi

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lynn cates
    replied
    ah ha

    Hello Sam. Ah ha! This requires further inspection.

    Thanks.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Sam. I presume you refer to the wife he left behind when he came to the UK? Her name eludes me at the moment. Weren't they possibly still married when he tied the knot with Ms. Baderski?
    There was no such "abandoned wife", Lynn - that comes from a misreading of the evidence by later authors, Sugden included (if memory serves). The simple truth is that the "Polish wife" was Lucie Baderski.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    first wife

    Hello Sam. I presume you refer to the wife he left behind when he came to the UK? Her name eludes me at the moment. Weren't they possibly still married when he tied the knot with Ms. Baderski?

    The best.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    In spite of his "change in MO," we know what his attitude towards women was, and that cruelty towards the same did not prove a problem for him.
    At least, we know what his attitude towards women was in the 1890s, after the breakup of his first marriage and the "loss" of his son. His attitude towards women prior to this may, perhaps, be gauged by the fact that he courted, and properly married, Lucie Baderski, and that he helped Ethel Radin by nursing her infant child - both of which happened in 1888-89.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    strong suspect

    Hello Anna and Natalie. I agree that Klosowski is a strong suspect. In fact, for my money, he is one of the 4 strongest. In spite of the paucity of physical evidence, it is enough for me that Sugden suspects him and that Abberline did--at least, at some point.

    In spite of his "change in MO," we know what his attitude towards women was, and that cruelty towards the same did not prove a problem for him.

    The thread on the inverted v's is excellent. Have you gotten as far as the drawings? Fascinating!

    The best.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Thanks Anna.Yes I remember that thread now and I can see your train of thought over the curious triangular type injuries on Catherine"s face.The lethal weapons displayed so prominently in the photo you kindly posted of Chapman/Klosowski with Bessie Taylor in their pub are certainly presented in a triangular sequence.The flags hund upside down apparently deliberately also appear to me to show a very contemptuous and angry side to Chapman"s nature.Its as though he might be referring to his weapon display-its guns and swords as weapons of war that could be used to destroy the countries represented by their flag---not as weapons of war that could be used to defend these countries as if that were the case he would surely have hung the stars and stripes the right way up?
    The triangular injuries to her face may be the killers response to the triangular shape cut he noted that happened as he cut off the tip of her nose,by adding these two inverted "v"s under both her eyes he "drew" a triangular pattern on her face.I dont know what an obsession with triangles might denote apart from a sense of destructive design in these cases that may have satisfied something in him. Its worth considering I do agree.
    I had a long conversation with Caz at the conference about the change in M O and we agreed that a serial killer such as Chapman with such a mercurial personality as he had, would have been unlikely to have stayed with one type of MO anyway, throughout a period of 15 years or more.Chapman made many changes in his life--changes of name,partners,jobs- he was an assistant surgeon in Poland,a barber then a publican here in the uk,he had many, many changes of digs -the districts and countries of those digs even--- 3 places in Poland,about 8 different places in London,then America,back to London,then Hastings,London again latterly--- in 1902 close to the river in Union Street, Southwark.His very changeable unsettled behaviour is one of the most significant features of his life in fact.
    Best
    Last edited by Natalie Severn; 11-08-2009, 01:48 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • miss_anna
    replied
    Originally posted by Frank van Oploo View Post
    Hi Anna,

    The thing is that the Ripper didn’t kill and mutilate them somewhere indoors first, only to put them on display outdoors afterwards. He also did that outdoors, taking the huge risk of getting caught. If the Ripper’s main pleasure was in exhibiting his victims and shocking the public, he didn’t need to kill and mutilate outdoors. Plus, he could have just slashed their throats like he did and cut up their faces, for instance. That wouldn’t have taken more than 30 seconds but would still be shocking, whereas his mutilations probably took some minutes at least.

    Even if he would have done his business indoors and left the bodies on display there, like with Dennis Rader’s victims, there would have been someone who’d find them and there would have been an audience, who would be shocked.

    All in all, in order to shock, I don't think the Ripper needed to do his job outdoors from beginning to end, nor do I think that, if he was so bent on doing things outdoors, he needed to mutilate as extensively as he did, or under the skirts.

    All the best,
    Frank
    Hi Frank!
    I believe the ripper was himself a bit of an exhibitionist and a gambler. "Crazy slashers" like Feigenbaum are generally captured quickly. The ripper was very aware of the risks involved and quickly withdrew from Liz Stride's body when a potential witness approached!

    The theory that the murders were committed indoors and the bodies deposited outdoors seems to be alive and well too, although i don't think that was the case.

    Leave a comment:


  • miss_anna
    replied
    Originally posted by Natalie Severn View Post
    Anna,

    I am willing to be persuaded about the ^ ^"s but still cant see much significance as yet. Like Frank I tend to see him having to get at the body itself most importantly -almost like one of the old operations for gall stones he opened the torso up to the breast bone and that seem to have been his aim-bring about death ,then open up the trunk and remove one or two body parts.Mission accomplished!
    The knife drawing on the face,nose ears seems to have been a type of "doodling" almost!
    Best
    Norma
    Hi Natalie!
    I noticed this forum has a whole thread on the ^^ marks that were on Eddowes face.

    True we can only spectulate and looking at Klowososki's triangular displays of weapons does excite my imagination, but it's nothing that would stand up in court!
    Serial killers are so rare about 1 in a million at the most! The argument that serial killers generally follow a pattern is just a generality. The leap from becoming a non serial killer to a serial killer is much much greater than the jump of a serial killer changing his modus operandi of murdering. It should be self evident that Chapman is a prime suspect!
    Last edited by miss_anna; 11-08-2009, 10:51 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    Klosowski's hospital tuition only lasted a few months, and cost him the equivalent of 60-something cents. With those sorts of qualifications, not even the Polish medical establishment would have been prepared to hire him as anything but a gofer.
    point of information Sam,[as if you didnt know already]

    After having fulfilled the statutory five year appreticeship to a surgeon in his home town, Klosowski went to Warsaw and in 1886 wrote to "His Excellency the Dean of Medical Faculty of the Imperial University of Warsaw' requesting permission to undergo examination for the purpose of receiving the degree of Junior Surgeon.He enclosed the "required documents".

    Town of Praga,[next to Praga Hospital Warsaw]---November 24 1886---
    I hereby certify that Severin Klosowski was employed by me in the capacity of assistant surgeon from August 20 1885 until February 1 1886 and during the whole of this time he fulfilled his duties with zeal[you bet!] and was of good behaviour. signed CF Olshanski

    He continued to work at the above clinic as an assistant surgeon until taking a short course in practical surgery at the Praga Hospital[October 1886--February 1887 after which all records from Poland come to an abrupt end---he was probably preparing to come to England in March 1887---when he actually arrived we still dont know.


    Finally :

    Ministry of Interior,Medical Administration of Warsaw December 5 1886.----
    In consequence of the application presented by Severin Klosowski,surgical pupil,the Medical Administration hereby testify to the effect that they do not see any reason to oppose his receiving the degree of Junior Surgeon.The required stamp duties have been paid---signed Dr M Oreszaief,Collegiate Councillor and Inspector. A Pominski,Secretary.
    Last edited by Natalie Severn; 11-08-2009, 12:42 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by miss_anna View Post
    You may accuse me of wild speculation, but i can imagine Klosowski in Poland being trained in pitch darkness to operate on cadavers. A good surgeon could do this. I imagine Klosowski was immensely disappointed when his Polish creditentals as a surgeon were rejected by the English medical establishment!
    Klosowski's hospital tuition only lasted a few months, and cost him the equivalent of 60-something cents. With those sorts of qualifications, not even the Polish medical establishment would have been prepared to hire him as anything but a gofer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Anna,

    I am willing to be persuaded about the ^ ^"s but still cant see much significance as yet. Like Frank I tend to see him having to get at the body itself most importantly -almost like one of the old operations for gall stones he opened the torso up to the breast bone and that seem to have been his aim-bring about death ,then open up the trunk and remove one or two body parts.Mission accomplished!
    The knife drawing on the face,nose ears seems to have been a type of "doodling" almost!
    Best
    Norma

    Leave a comment:


  • FrankO
    replied
    Originally posted by miss_anna View Post
    The big mistake i believe that people make about the ripper is assuming that his main pleasure was derived from slashing and mutilating. I believe jtr's main pleasure was in exhibiting his victims and shocking the community. As with the btk killer it was important that his victims be discovered.
    Hi Anna,

    The thing is that the Ripper didn’t kill and mutilate them somewhere indoors first, only to put them on display outdoors afterwards. He also did that outdoors, taking the huge risk of getting caught. If the Ripper’s main pleasure was in exhibiting his victims and shocking the public, he didn’t need to kill and mutilate outdoors. Plus, he could have just slashed their throats like he did and cut up their faces, for instance. That wouldn’t have taken more than 30 seconds but would still be shocking, whereas his mutilations probably took some minutes at least.

    Even if he would have done his business indoors and left the bodies on display there, like with Dennis Rader’s victims, there would have been someone who’d find them and there would have been an audience, who would be shocked.

    All in all, in order to shock, I don't think the Ripper needed to do his job outdoors from beginning to end, nor do I think that, if he was so bent on doing things outdoors, he needed to mutilate as extensively as he did, or under the skirts.

    All the best,
    Frank

    Leave a comment:


  • miss_anna
    replied
    Originally posted by Natalie Severn View Post
    Thanks for posting these Anna---very helpful! I had actually forgotten where I had seen them and now you"ve reminded me! Stangely enough I knew this about some surgeons from a long time back and I seem to recall that I read about it in a medical book of all things!
    Its getting late for me so I will leave it at that for tonight but you raise some compelling issues here you know!
    Best
    Norma
    x
    yes---the patterning of triangles may well have been embedded in his consciousness but whether it symbolized anything much is hard to know......
    I guess we can only speculate on the meaning of the 2 triangle shaped wounds..The Maybrick diary believers think the ^^ on Eddowes face should stand for M=Maybrick, but i'm not on that bandwagon or the Illuminati pyramid rants. Being at the top of the pyramid or the king of the mountain has a meaning to an egoist, but of course i can only speculate. Hope you don't have ripper dreams! Best Wishes!

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Thanks for posting these Anna---very helpful! I had actually forgotten where I had seen them and now you"ve reminded me! Stangely enough I knew this about some surgeons from a long time back and I seem to recall that I read about it in a medical book of all things!
    Its getting late for me so I will leave it at that for tonight but you raise some compelling issues here you know!
    Best
    Norma
    x
    yes---the patterning of triangles may well have been embedded in his consciousness but whether it symbolized anything much is hard to know......
    Last edited by Natalie Severn; 11-07-2009, 03:01 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • miss_anna
    replied


    Interesting point Natalie!
    I'm not trying to make surgeons look bad, but it's generally accepted as fact that a "sadist" is a much better surgeon than a "touchy feely" doctor who feels plenty of compassion for his patient. Compassionate people just can't seem to be cool and professional when cutting up a human being. There are articles discussing this fact, but i'd have to google them up.

    I also noticed Klosowski/Chapman's display of weapons on the wall in these pictures of him with his later murdered wife Bessie Taylor.

    The triangle shape of this display of weapons makes me think of the 2 triangular wounds made under under Catherine Eddowes eyes by the ripper.

    I scoff at the freemason conspiracy take on these wounds, but i feel they symbolized something for the ripper.
    Last edited by miss_anna; 11-07-2009, 01:33 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X