Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I think I have found him.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Elamarna
    replied
    it's almost like they want to keep bringing the idea they have a theory they must not talk about, into the open.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    I just wonder why, given most of posts from the group appear to be directed to each other generally saying shut up, they don't just PM each other?

    Leave a comment:


  • Observer
    replied
    Originally posted by Amanda View Post
    Dear Elamarna,

    As a co-member of the grampton project, I must jump in to defend Pinkmoon.
    I am sure he didn't mean to tease, but rather to reassure that there are genuine researchers working hard to answer questions.

    I do feel that old pinky may be putting his neck on the line by giving a date for the release of our facts but please rest assured that he will be reprimanded with the utmost severity for doing so, as the success of our work is dependent upon many factors out of our control.
    Amanda
    Yes I hear it's going to "blow the case out of the water". Ahem...yes. Sounds to me as if some of the genuine researchers are being led up the garden path. It's not the first time this has occured, and it will not be the last.

    Leave a comment:


  • Observer
    replied
    Originally posted by Panderoona View Post
    guys I just got off the phone. 'b' is not amused. Please take it off these boards.
    I take it you'll not be the individual who has the job of proof reading the finished article?

    Leave a comment:


  • Brenda
    replied
    .

    Leave a comment:


  • Panderoona
    replied
    guys I just got off the phone. 'b' is not amused. Please take it off these boards.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Richard,

    Have to say I am coming to the same conclusion.
    First thing was it could upset the grandson, then it was mentioned that it was something to do with how the evidence was obtained, then the question of funding was mentioned, now they can't say anything because the data is out of their control. either they have evidence or they don't.

    I was concerned that perhaps I was wrong to say they were close to teasing, hence my reply to Amanda; but it seems others feel even stronger

    regards

    Elamarna

    Leave a comment:


  • richardnunweek
    replied
    Hi.
    I have just looked in the mirror , to see if I was still wearing long trousers, I have never heard such a lot of wind up ..
    Regards Richard.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Dear Amanda,

    I am sure you would agree that we have had a lot of teasing on the site recently, not by your friends I should add.
    Must say I have found Pinkmoon to be polite and courteous, my point was that, if it is best not to mention the theory at present, it may be best just to keep silent about it until you are ready, or you could be accused of teasing.

    Perhaps I could have used different wording
    Please let me assure you no attack or disrespect to Pinkmoon or the group was intended.

    Don't tell him off to much.

    Elamarna

    Leave a comment:


  • Rosella
    replied
    Having 'secret' projects going on involving a few posters and excluding the majority just screams elitism to me. Hints and little crumbs thrown out occasionally.

    I thought everybody on this Forum was equally interested in sharing information and trying to find out as much as we can about JTR (with the exception of Pierre and those about to publish, of course.) Sorry but it just leaves a bad taste in the mouth as far as I'm concerned.

    Leave a comment:


  • richardnunweek
    replied
    Hi,
    After being with Casebook for approx 16 years, I would dearly love to find out the Killers identity, I truly, would be the first to yell out a Hell yeah, but come on guys, this sounds like a bigger masonic cover up mystery, then ever was portrayed over the years.
    The privileged few , in the know, the rest also rans..?
    Regards Richard.

    Leave a comment:


  • Amanda
    replied
    Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
    Dear Pinkmoon

    You are in serious danger of being as bad a tease as Pierre.
    May I respectfully ask that until you are in a position to reveal your BIG news that you stop poping up every so often to mention that it is coming. It's bad enough having the OP.
    don't let yourself fall into his behaviour please
    Regards

    Elamarna
    Dear Elamarna,

    As a co-member of the grampton project, I must jump in to defend Pinkmoon.
    I am sure he didn't mean to tease, but rather to reassure that there are genuine researchers working hard to answer questions.

    I do feel that old pinky may be putting his neck on the line by giving a date for the release of our facts but please rest assured that he will be reprimanded with the utmost severity for doing so, as the success of our work is dependent upon many factors out of our control.
    Amanda

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Dear Pinkmoon

    You are in serious danger of being as bad a tease as Pierre.
    May I respectfully ask that until you are in a position to reveal your BIG news that you stop poping up every so often to mention that it is coming. It's bad enough having the OP.
    don't let yourself fall into his behaviour please
    Regards

    Elamarna

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkmoon
    replied
    Hopefully the new year might bring us some exciting news concerning the ripper murders.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    A "'legitimate theory", Pierre, is one in which the author says "I think I have found him" but refuses to provide any further details.

    So you are doing very well.
    Now that was funny.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X