I think I have found him.

[1888]

No! You've alread proved you don't have a clue about the shawl and differences between mtrdna and nuclear dna.

If you say so... although I can't recall that I went into details like the difference between nuclear and mitochondrial dna as well as other intricacies of the case. Throw all the rotten tomatoes you want at me for my original post. But please don't make a case of incompetence out of a few crumbs.

[EmaEm]

LOL.
This thread rocks. I haven't had this much fun since homecoming 97.

It's a joke folks. And pretty dam funny IMHO.

Only funny if you are 12 years old.

[1888]

Hello 1888.
As a criminal psychologist, i would imagine that you could provide valuable insight to the case SO i would hope you dont always feel the need to lurk. The Pierre Theory has been a diversion mainly because, if you are new to the case & forum, it makes you learn the particulars of this massive case. Right or wrong, who cares! At least its an opportunity to walk the case at a pace i can keep up with, and develop my own theories along the way.

Robert St Devil, yes if I may and have the feeling that I have something insightful to say I will contribute to other threads in the future. Pierre simply tickled me out of my long time lurking position.

[EmaEm]

1888:

No! You've already proved you don't have a clue about the shawl and differences between mtrdna and nuclear dna.

[EmaEm]

Agreed! Unfortunately, I've just experienced dreadful bullying on "the other site" and frankly, both sites, in my view, need to shake up their ideas about monitoring crap behaviour.