I think I have found him.

[Scott Nelson]

You need to read Anderson more carefully.

[The Rookie Detective]

Ooh well I guess it had o come to this.

"I've solved it but I'm not telling you anything"

Sounds like Anderson in his Memoir.


Haha!

[Marie Antoinette]

I see what you did there..

Haha, I had to read again. You mean he implied that I have another account?
No, I haven't. Moderators, feel free to confirm my ip adress.

I am far too old to play any games online.

[Mayerling]

Can't think of the real reason it only goes to 1912. Presumably other ledgers have been mislaid or lost.

A smart ass explanation would be that the indefatigable old news editor and early form of "Ripperologist", William T. Stead, got his hands on the other ledgers, and had them on the Titanic when it sank and he died.

Jeff

[GUT]

Come on Pierre name your suspect.

He can't he hasn't made that part up yet.

[John Wheat]

I am trying to refute the hypothesis about the Rainham case but data is partly missing.

Come on Pierre name your suspect.

[Pierre]

[QUOTE=Trevor Marriott;392852]

Because the ledgers went from 1888-1912 in different volumes

www.trevormarriott.co.uk

Hi Trevor,

but what can be the reason(s) for the fact that 1912 is the last year?

Regards, Pierre

[Pierre]

Hi,

according to my theory he starts with the victim of the "Thames mystery" in 1887 and stops with the Pinchin Street victim. So it includes the three Thames mystery cases, the canonical five, MacKenzie and the Pinchin Street case. The evidence explains why he stopped. He stopped for personal reasons.

Regards Pierre

I am trying to refute the hypothesis about the Rainham case but data is partly missing.

[Harry D]

Trevor, I assume you weren't able to establish who these four new suspects were?

[Pierre]

[QUOTE=Trevor Marriott;392852]

Because the ledgers went from 1888-1912 in different volumes

www.trevormarriott.co.uk

Hi Trevor,

but what can be the reason(s) for the fact that 1912 is the last year?

Regards, Pierre

[Trevor Marriott]

[QUOTE=Pierre;392847]

Hi,

Why to 1912?

Does anyone know why?

Regards, Pierre

Because the ledgers went from 1888-1912 in different volumes

https://www.trevormarriott.co.uk

[Pierre]

[QUOTE=Storm Teacup;392742]

I read an article in the Daily Fail about a court battle between a Ripper researcher and the Met Police regarding disclosing documents that are said to include four new suspects for the serial killings and have 36,000 entries detailing police interaction with informants between 1888 to 1912.

Hi,

Why to 1912?

Does anyone know why?

Regards, Pierre

[JadenCollins]

It's your first post as Marie Antoinette.

I see what you did there..

[GUT]

......still not been found then ho hum...

Or lost again.

[Geddy2112]

......still not been found then ho hum...