Originally posted by Jon Guy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I think I have found him.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MarieO View PostI am new here but read through most of this thread. I don't know whether to laugh, cry or go back to lurking. I just feel this is a game sort of like cat and mouse. He claims he has answers but won't tell just to make people nuts and want more.
Leave a comment:
-
I am new here but read through most of this thread. I don't know whether to laugh, cry or go back to lurking. I just feel this is a game sort of like cat and mouse. He claims he has answers but won't tell just to make people nuts and want more.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by David Orsam View PostA "'legitimate theory", Pierre, is one in which the author says "I think I have found him" but refuses to provide any further details.
So you are doing very well.
Since I have exposed the fact that Pierre has admitted that I drew out that Bowyer is the key to this case,probably an anagram, I have concluded that jack the ripper is Marvin Hagler.LolLast edited by Abby Normal; 12-05-2015, 08:55 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by c.d. View PostWhy in the world do people keep contributing to this thread? Enough already. Move on, nothing to see here.
c.d.
Oh, but I am so glad they do. Don't know when I've ever laughed this much.
Delightful, delectable and delicious this thread is.Last edited by curious; 12-05-2015, 05:49 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pinkmoon View PostI was worried that pierre had been tipped of about grampton but I now know he hasn't so I'm happy.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View PostDear all,
I said earlier this week I would not reply to this mans posts any more. and this is not a reply to any post..
New threads every few days are started by this person.
These threads bring up same faintly ridiculous ideas, yet he tells all of us that he is only here to unburden himself.
He has told us he is a scientist but refuses to say in what discipline, he has made disparaging remarks at peoples education and qualifications.
At least twice he has taken sarcasm at face value and thanked posters for agreeing with him
it is interesting that he often attacks those who write books on the subject, in fact he appears very bitter about those who do, i wonder why?
At least those writers have had a real theory, even if many of them are extremely weak, and published a name, he has not and I believe he cannot.
In case others have not noticed he now often uses the Royal "we" and has even started to refer to himself in the third person. so be it, it is his right.
However everybody else has the right to ignore him and this SHOULD be done now.
I IMPLORE you all to not enter into debate with this person. he appears to be intent on damaging the study of the Whitechapel murders and this site in particular.
if however he does come up with a name and a theory then all of the rest of us are wrong, so be it.
Leave a comment:
-
Dear all,
I said earlier this week I would not reply to this mans posts any more. and this is not a reply to any post..
New threads every few days are started by this person.
These threads bring up same faintly ridiculous ideas, yet he tells all of us that he is only here to unburden himself.
He has told us he is a scientist but refuses to say in what discipline, he has made disparaging remarks at peoples education and qualifications.
At least twice he has taken sarcasm at face value and thanked posters for agreeing with him
it is interesting that he often attacks those who write books on the subject, in fact he appears very bitter about those who do, i wonder why?
At least those writers have had a real theory, even if many of them are extremely weak, and published a name, he has not and I believe he cannot.
In case others have not noticed he now often uses the Royal "we" and has even started to refer to himself in the third person. so be it, it is his right.
However everybody else has the right to ignore him and this SHOULD be done now.
I IMPLORE you all to not enter into debate with this person. he appears to be intent on damaging the study of the Whitechapel murders and this site in particular.
if however he does come up with a name and a theory then all of the rest of us are wrong, so be it.Last edited by Elamarna; 12-05-2015, 02:56 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Pierre View PostWhat exactly is a "legitimate theory"?
So you are doing very well.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Harry D View PostAh.
It was mildly amusing at first, but I can't believe people are still hanging on Pierre's every word.
If he has a legitimate theory, then he would do what most armchair detectives do, contact the resident experts, canvas opinion on the forums, write a book of his own, or some combination of all three. The fact he keeps stringing this out tells me that he's making this up as he goes along and getting a real kick out of the attention everyone's affording him.
What exactly is a "legitimate theory"?
Is it in all the books that has been written about Jack the Ripper without finding him?
Regards Pierre
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by belinda View PostI'm agreeing with you. Everybody stop encouraging this
It was mildly amusing at first, but I can't believe people are still hanging on Pierre's every word.
If he has a legitimate theory, then he would do what most armchair detectives do, contact the resident experts, canvas opinion on the forums, write a book of his own, or some combination of all three. The fact he keeps stringing this out tells me that he's making this up as he goes along and getting a real kick out of the attention everyone's affording him.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: