I think I have found him.

[Robert St Devil]

I only posted on here to see if my friends had blabbed about grampton I'm pretty sure by your reaction they havnt I do think I have chosen at least one of my gramptonites as they have been christened unwisely

So then you're saying that you only used this forum to serve your own selfish purpose. I thought it was bad enough when you threatened Phil Carter earlier in the week to keep his mouth shut. Why Casebook doesnt pull your card, and Orsam for starting that hoax of a thread "a new suspect", is beyond me. You guys are swine.

[RockySullivan]

I am really sorry and I do not wish to be disrespectful at all. However for weeks people have been having a go at Pierre for not saying a name.
Indeed there was even a spoof in the pub talk section.
Now suddenly we have the same from a respected group of posters.
Not only are they doing the very same thing. They are saying it's not in anyone's interest to even discuss their theory.

.
Some of the posts are almost coming across as if they are in fear.
Sorry is this all about Comercial interest of have they simply lost the plot

With the deepest regret this is becoming a complete farce and doing no good at all for this forum.
Regards to all

Agreed

[RockySullivan]

And why should we be quiet about "Crampton"? I thought Tom was writing the le grand book. He's jumped ships?

Do you have something in the cooperation with the suspect's descendant, some type of commercial deal where those involved are worried the grandson will destroy evidence? If it's a grandson, then it would seem you are discussing a "PC" Initials can be quite useful when it is necessary to discuss a suspect without naming them so it doesn't turn up on google search. I find nothing when searching this name other than his father is discussed in letters from Queen V during the Ripper murders.

Maybe it is him discussed in the QV letters. If PC is "gramps", surgeon, is the theory that he removed the uterus in order to examine one from a prostitute, related to frequent sexual activity, uterine cancer or Vd?

[Mayerling]

[QUOTE=Phil Carter;360961]

Hi Pinkmoon,

I have been asking around. .and nobody. . To my knowledge, has given Pierre the tip off. Including moi. The fb group is pretty tight on the important bits imho.

What this site knows is findable anyway. The juicy stuff is pretty safe I reckon.

Pockets

Hi Phil,

Now I'm curious about how your quoting mechanism in your PC managed to attribute a comment from Pinkmoon to me. That is curious.

Jeff

[RockySullivan]

And why should we be quiet about "Crampton"? I thought Tom was writing the le grand book. He's jumped ships?

Do you have something in the cooperation with the suspect's descendant, some type of commercial deal where those involved are worried the grandson will destroy evidence? If it's a grandson, then it would seem you are discussing a "PC" Initials can be quite useful when it is necessary to discuss a suspect without naming them so it doesn't turn up on google search. I find nothing when searching this name other than his father is discussed in letters from Queen V during the Ripper murders.

[RockySullivan]

What so the casebook faceebook discovered a new poi and have found some interesting info that points to him being the ripper? and they are keeping it silent in orderr not to offend his relative? and pierre's suspect is the same person, that he found independently or is one of the members of the fb group using an alias?

[David Orsam]

But are we going to find the Whitechapel killer or play games?

From your posts so far, I assume the answer is: play games.

[Phil Carter]

[QUOTE=pinkmoon;360960]

Thank you no offence taken I'm just sorry grampton had to be mentioned on here because I thought one of my "friends" had tipped Pierre of.The facebook page was set up so there would be no need to involve everybody.

Hi Pinkmoon,

I have been asking around. .and nobody. . To my knowledge, has given Pierre the tip off. Including moi. The fb group is pretty tight on the important bits imho.

What this site knows is findable anyway. The juicy stuff is pretty safe I reckon.

Pockets

[pinkmoon]

[QUOTE=Mayerling;360959]

Hi Pinkmoon,

I plead guilty at creating the term "gramptonites" (or "Gramptonites"). I thought it more euphonic than "Gramtonphiliacs" or "Gramptonphiles". In time, when that solution or theory is spelled out, you can correct the nickname. At the moment, however unwisely chosen or christened, what's the harm in using it?

Best of luck,

Jeff

Thank you no offence taken I'm just sorry grampton had to be mentioned on here because I thought one of my "friends" had tipped Pierre of.The facebook page was set up so there would be no need to involve everybody.

[Mayerling]

[QUOTE=pinkmoon;360946]

I only posted on here to see if my friends had blabbed about grampton I'm pretty sure by your reaction they havnt I do think I have chosen at least one of my gramptonites as they have been christened unwisely

Hi Pinkmoon,

I plead guilty at creating the term "gramptonites" (or "Gramptonites"). I thought it more euphonic than "Gramtonphiliacs" or "Gramptonphiles"*. In time, when that solution or theory is spelled out, you can correct the nickname. At the moment, however unwisely chosen or christened, what's the harm in using it?

Best of luck,

Jeff

*In thinking it over it could have been "Gramtonophiles" or "Gramtonophiliacs" but it is expanding into too many syllables. And that means someone reading it might put the em-PHA-sis on the wrong "syl-LA-ble", as some old song said.

Jeff

[David Orsam]

WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS DAVID ORSAM PERSON?

Don't worry Pierre, my post about the pot and the kettle was written in metaphorical language, which is why you had no chance of understanding it.

[David Orsam]

YOU ARE LYING ABOUT ME AGAIN DAVID.

I am not lying about you at all Pierre. I quote from your post #58 in this thread:

'When I say that I think I have found him, I mean what I say and say what I mean.

So why do I think I have found him?

1.A few sources produced during the killing spree can easily be connected to the same person.
2.The sources seem to be independent to each other but they point to one person.
3.The sources give the motive. It is a clear motive.
4.The motive can easily be connected to his own personal history in specific sources about his life.
5.His background and knowledge makes him clearly capable of committing the murders and performing the mutilations and dismemberments.
6.Sources that he produced, which today are impossible to understand because they are misinterpreted, become very easy to understand with this theory.

So what can I tell you about what I know about him?

1.He was extremely organized.
2.He was not a jew, not a “lunatic”, not a doctor.
3.The murder dates are connected to his own personal motive.
4.The methods he used are clearly connected to his own motive.
5.He wrote to the police.
6.He wrote a letter to the editor in a paper not signing it “Jack the Ripper” where he gave the exact address to one of the murder sites.
7.If the police had understood his communications, they would have caught him.
8.He wasn´t interrupted efter killing Stride. He was just being very cautious.
9.With the murders he wanted to say something to society.'

It was there in point 6 of your list of things you claimed to know about your suspect. It was, in other words, a part of your theory. I mean, it had to be given that your suspect was supposedly identifying the victim who was to be killed at some point in the future as well as the victim's address and the date of her murder.

But your most recent position is that the letter: 'is not a source on which I have built the theory of who the killer is'.

So I feel confident in saying you originally made clear to the forum that the letter formed part of your theory and now you want to distance yourself from that very same letter.

[Pierre]

[QUOTE=pinkmoon;360946]

I only posted on here to see if my friends had blabbed about grampton I'm pretty sure by your reaction they havnt I do think I have chosen at least one of my gramptonites as they have been christened unwisely

Well, if they were your friends you would have known without testing them wouldn´t you?

But are we going to find the Whitechapel killer or play games?

Regards Pierre

[Pierre]

Pierre, can I introduce you to the kettle?

"Kettle, pot, pot, kettle."

Best not mention it's a black kettle, Pierre.

WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS DAVID ORSAM PERSON?

[Pierre]

[QUOTE=David Orsam;360942]

At some point, having originally made clear that the letter was part of his theory, he decided to distance himself from it QUOTE]


YOU ARE LYING ABOUT ME AGAIN DAVID.