Originally posted by David Orsam
View Post
I think I have found him.
Collapse
X
-
[QUOTE=David Orsam;360942]
At some point, having originally made clear that the letter was part of his theory, he decided to distance himself from it QUOTE]
YOU ARE LYING ABOUT ME AGAIN DAVID.
Leave a comment:
-
Pierre, can I introduce you to the kettle?Originally posted by Pierre View PostYes, I have been thinking the same. And if they want to play a game, I honestly hope they enjoy it. But I have no interest in it.
"Kettle, pot, pot, kettle."
Best not mention it's a black kettle, Pierre.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Elamarna,Originally posted by Elamarna View PostPierre.
I agree.
If your,forgive me please, hints were not bad enough for many here.
It is clear we now have a group who have a idea just like you and are even more secretive.
But hang on. One of them almost blows the whole thing and actually says it's not a secret. Another also give very obscure hints.
And some of them seem to think they know who you are.
I am left with the following conclusions
Either the whole thing is invented to wind you up. Or there is a real group working on a serious theory. Some of whom feel it is a secret for some reason and some who don't.
Now they are saying it will upset a family member. Well families of all the suspects named must have been upset too when their family member was named.
Still obviously it's so big it will solve the case . So I guess the rest of us will keep on waiting.
This
Yes, I have been thinking the same. And if they want to play a game, I honestly hope they enjoy it. But I have no interest in it.
Best wishes
Pierre
Leave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=Pierre;360937]I only posted on here to see if my friends had blabbed about grampton I'm pretty sure by your reaction they havnt I do think I have chosen at least one of my gramptonites as they have been christened unwiselyOriginally posted by pinkmoon View Post
Grampton
Grandson
Leave a comment:
-
Can I just point out that this is not true at all. I did question Pierre very closely about his claim that his suspect wrote a letter to the press in advance of Mary Kelly's murder in which Mary Kelly's name and address, as well as the date of 9 November, was mentioned. Once I discovered (after some teeth pulling) that Mary Kelly's name and address was not, in fact, mentioned in the letter, I pointed out that if the rest of his data sources were like that letter then his theory is doomed.Originally posted by Pierre View PostSo instead of questioning, people like David add their own ideas to what they think is my theory and my data and then try to destroy that.
At some point, having originally made clear that the letter was part of his theory, he decided to distance himself from it and now wants us to believe that it is no part of his theory, which makes it impossible to understand why he even mentioned it on this forum in the first place.
Leave a comment:
-
Pierre.
I agree.
If your,forgive me please, hints were not bad enough for many here.
It is clear we now have a group who have a idea just like you and are even more secretive.
But hang on. One of them almost blows the whole thing and actually says it's not a secret. Another also give very obscure hints.
And some of them seem to think they know who you are.
I am left with the following conclusions
Either the whole thing is invented to wind you up. Or there is a real group working on a serious theory. Some of whom feel it is a secret for some reason and some who don't.
Now they are saying it will upset a family member. Well families of all the suspects named must have been upset too when their family member was named.
Still obviously it's so big it will solve the case . So I guess the rest of us will keep on waiting.
This
Leave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=pinkmoon;360912]GramptonOriginally posted by Tom_Wescott View PostLowercase 'b' and upper case 'P' sometimes with an umlaut, if we're to be correct. And no, Phil, I don't think the team would want me discussing this yet.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott[/QUOTEo
No we don't want this discussed on here !I think it might upset the grandson so let's save it for the Facebook group.
Grandson
Leave a comment:
-
There is no physical evidence within the murders themselves had aspects that could be construed as being based on any specific religion. That is not to say religious beliefs can be ruled out as a possible motive....since we don't understand what the motives were.Originally posted by Pierre View PostThere is no evidence for any religious connection in the Ripper case.
Regards Pierre
Leave a comment:
-
Gramptonite is the only thing the Ripper feared. When he was in the vicinity of Gramptonite all his powers deserted him, and he sank helpless to the floor.
Stride knew this and tried to bluff him with her "Gramptonite, some other night" line, but it didn't save her.
Leave a comment:
-
I sense a new Masonic - like conspiracy here. The "Gramptonites" are not the men who will be caught for nothing!!
Leave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=Tom_Wescott;360838]Lowercase 'b' and upper case 'P' sometimes with an umlaut, if we're to be correct. And no, Phil, I don't think the team would want me discussing this yet.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott[/QUOTEo
No we don't want this discussed on here !I think it might upset the grandson so let's save it for the Facebook group.
Leave a comment:
-
Next to Peter Frampton's house at Frampton Court. Nice house. Looks like Pierres house.Originally posted by Elamarna View PostWhere would that be?Last edited by Robert St Devil; 11-19-2015, 07:23 PM.
Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: