Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rating The Suspects.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Lewis C View Post

    Abby, in a nutshell, Buchan committed suicide on his birthday, which was also the day of Mary Jane Kelly's funeral. For one thing, this would explain why the murders stopped, if Kelly really was the last Ripper murder. Barber also connects his suicide on his birthday with the Ripper attacking the wombs of his victims, because a birthday is the anniversary of the day a person exits the womb. Also, his father had a navel apparel store or something like that, and Lawende thought that the man he saw dressed like a sailor. If you want some more detail about Buchan, because maybe my summation doesn't do full justice to the theory, about 2 months ago, Richard Jones, on his Youtube channel, posted a video in which he interviewed the chief proponent of the Buchan theory, Roger Barber. I came away from the video with the belief that Buchan isn't one of the 15 best suspects, but also isn't a ridiculous suspect in the manner of Gull or Lewis Carroll. I think Richard Jones' videos about specific suspects are usually worth seeing, even if the suspect isn't the greatest. Here's a link to it:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0MHE_v-QWs
    thanks lewis

    Leave a comment:


  • FISHY1118
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post

    Yes Gull was in the area at the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

    Was not Gull in the area at the time John?

    Sure, dismiss him for other reasons that you might favour, but as far as my knowledge of Gull goes, he was in London at the time and could easily have traveled in and around Whitechapel.
    Yes Gull was in the area at the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • FISHY1118
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post

    I have to agree with you Abby Maybrick, Van Gogh and royal conspiracy suspects are fantasy suspects.
    Atleast with Wentworth Bellsmith we have someone who was in the area at the time.
    Was not Gull in the area at the time John?

    Sure, dismiss him for other reasons that you might favour, but as far as my knowledge of Gull goes, he was in London at the time and could easily have traveled in and around Whitechapel.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lewis C
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    could anyone give me a nutshell on who the following suspects are and what they got going for them? it would be much appreciated.

    buchan
    dr john williams
    craig
    wentworth bell smith
    Abby, in a nutshell, Buchan committed suicide on his birthday, which was also the day of Mary Jane Kelly's funeral. For one thing, this would explain why the murders stopped, if Kelly really was the last Ripper murder. Barber also connects his suicide on his birthday with the Ripper attacking the wombs of his victims, because a birthday is the anniversary of the day a person exits the womb. Also, his father had a navel apparel store or something like that, and Lawende thought that the man he saw dressed like a sailor. If you want some more detail about Buchan, because maybe my summation doesn't do full justice to the theory, about 2 months ago, Richard Jones, on his Youtube channel, posted a video in which he interviewed the chief proponent of the Buchan theory, Roger Barber. I came away from the video with the belief that Buchan isn't one of the 15 best suspects, but also isn't a ridiculous suspect in the manner of Gull or Lewis Carroll. I think Richard Jones' videos about specific suspects are usually worth seeing, even if the suspect isn't the greatest. Here's a link to it:

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
    Ammendment #13


    --- (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) ---

    13 = 2 - 2 - 3 - 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Kelly, James

    11 = 2 - 2 - 3 - 0 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Bury, William Henry

    10 = 2 - 1 - 2 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 : Grainger, William Grant

    09 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Cutbush, Thomas Hayne

    09 = 2 - 1 - 4 - 0 - 0 - 2 - 0 - 0 : Deeming, Frederick Bailey

    09 = 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 : Hyams, Hyam

    09 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Puckridge, Oswald

    08 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Kosminski, Aaron (Aron Mordke Kozminski)

    08 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Pizer, John "Leather Apron"

    08 = 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Lechmere, George Capel Scudamore

    08 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 0 : Barnado, Thomas John

    O8 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 1 : Thompson, Francis

    07 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Chapman, George (Seweryn Antonowicz Kłosowski)

    07 = 1 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 : Tumblety, Francis

    07 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 2 - 0 - 0 : Smith, G. Wentworth Bell

    07 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Cohen, David

    07 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Kidney, Michael

    06 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 0 : Thompson, Francis

    06 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Levy, Jacob

    06 = 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Pizer, John

    05 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Druitt, Montague John

    05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Barnett, Joseph

    05 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 1 : Stephenson, Robert Donston (or Roslyn D'Onston)

    05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Sutton, Henry Gawen

    05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1- 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Buchan, Edward

    05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Williams, Dr. John

    05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Craig, Francis Spurzheim

    04 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Stephen, James Kenneth

    04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Bachert, Albert

    04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Cross, Charles (Charles Allen Lechmere)

    04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Hardiman, James

    04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Hutchinson, George

    04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Mann, Robert

    04 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 : Maybrick, James

    04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Le Grand, Charles

    04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Maybrick, Michael

    03 = 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Sickert, Walter Richard

    02 = 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Gull, Sir William Withey


    Legend:

    (A) Age/physical health

    . . . 2 = no issue

    . . . 1 = issues possibly creating doubt

    . . . 0 = serious issue/ could potentially eliminate

    (B) Location/access to murder sites

    . . . 2 = no issues

    . . . 1 = reasonable travel

    . . . 0 = serious doubt

    (C) Violence

    . . . 4 = killed woman (non-relative) with knife

    . . . 3 = killed female relative with knife

    . . . 2 = violence with a knife

    . . . 1 = violence without a knife

    . . . 0 = no known violence

    (D) Mental health issues

    . . . 2 = serious/violent

    . . . 1 = other

    . . . 0 = none known

    (E) Police interest

    . . . 2 = at the time (without exoneration)

    . . . 1 = later (within 10 yrs and without exoneration))

    . . . 0 = none known or not serious

    (F) Hatred/dislike of women/prostitutes

    . . . 2 = yes

    . . . 1 = link to prostitutes

    . . . 0 = none known

    (G) Medical/anatomical knowledge (inc. animals)

    . . . 1 = yes

    . . . 0 = none known

    (H) Alcohol/drug issue

    . . . 1 = yes

    . . . 0 = none known


    Suspects Added

    Michael Maybrick and John Pizer*


    * I scored him 2 on violence due to the knife attack on James Willis even though his name was given as Pozer. I scored him 0 on police interest because interest was only brief.


    This is an example of a ‘suspect’ that would have scored fairly high if he didn’t have an alibi for the Double Event which imo eliminates any suspect. William Piggott, would have scored (2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 2 - 0 - 1 = 9) except that he was admitted to the Whitechapel Infirmary, 10th September 1888 (from Commercial Street Police Station) for Delirium Tremens and wasn’t discharged until 9th October which exonerates him of Stride and Eddowes.

    ​​​​​​….

    Ive finished going through Morley’s suspect list and I can’t see any more worth adding (he lists 443 of them btw) but I will add if anyone makes a suggestion.

    ….

    Thoughts requested - I’ve been thinking for a while that I should perhaps change the ‘violence’ criteria to cover only violence against women? I just think it might give a slightly more accurate representation although it will be a pain to go back through them. It was when I had to award Pizer 2 points that I thought that a change might be needed.

    hi herlock
    deeming should het a zero for number 2. there is serious doubt

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Ammendment #13


    --- (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) ---

    13 = 2 - 2 - 3 - 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Kelly, James

    11 = 2 - 2 - 3 - 0 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Bury, William Henry

    10 = 2 - 1 - 2 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 : Grainger, William Grant

    09 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Cutbush, Thomas Hayne

    09 = 2 - 1 - 4 - 0 - 0 - 2 - 0 - 0 : Deeming, Frederick Bailey

    09 = 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 : Hyams, Hyam

    09 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Puckridge, Oswald

    08 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Kosminski, Aaron (Aron Mordke Kozminski)

    08 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Pizer, John "Leather Apron"

    08 = 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Lechmere, George Capel Scudamore

    08 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 0 : Barnado, Thomas John

    O8 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 1 : Thompson, Francis

    07 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Chapman, George (Seweryn Antonowicz Kłosowski)

    07 = 1 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 : Tumblety, Francis

    07 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 2 - 0 - 0 : Smith, G. Wentworth Bell

    07 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Cohen, David

    07 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Kidney, Michael

    06 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 0 : Thompson, Francis

    06 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Levy, Jacob

    06 = 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Pizer, John

    05 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Druitt, Montague John

    05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Barnett, Joseph

    05 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 1 : Stephenson, Robert Donston (or Roslyn D'Onston)

    05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Sutton, Henry Gawen

    05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1- 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Buchan, Edward

    05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Williams, Dr. John

    05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Craig, Francis Spurzheim

    04 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Stephen, James Kenneth

    04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Bachert, Albert

    04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Cross, Charles (Charles Allen Lechmere)

    04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Hardiman, James

    04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Hutchinson, George

    04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Mann, Robert

    04 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 : Maybrick, James

    04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Le Grand, Charles

    04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Maybrick, Michael

    03 = 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Sickert, Walter Richard

    02 = 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Gull, Sir William Withey


    Legend:

    (A) Age/physical health

    . . . 2 = no issue

    . . . 1 = issues possibly creating doubt

    . . . 0 = serious issue/ could potentially eliminate

    (B) Location/access to murder sites

    . . . 2 = no issues

    . . . 1 = reasonable travel

    . . . 0 = serious doubt

    (C) Violence

    . . . 4 = killed woman (non-relative) with knife

    . . . 3 = killed female relative with knife

    . . . 2 = violence with a knife

    . . . 1 = violence without a knife

    . . . 0 = no known violence

    (D) Mental health issues

    . . . 2 = serious/violent

    . . . 1 = other

    . . . 0 = none known

    (E) Police interest

    . . . 2 = at the time (without exoneration)

    . . . 1 = later (within 10 yrs and without exoneration))

    . . . 0 = none known or not serious

    (F) Hatred/dislike of women/prostitutes

    . . . 2 = yes

    . . . 1 = link to prostitutes

    . . . 0 = none known

    (G) Medical/anatomical knowledge (inc. animals)

    . . . 1 = yes

    . . . 0 = none known

    (H) Alcohol/drug issue

    . . . 1 = yes

    . . . 0 = none known


    Suspects Added

    Michael Maybrick and John Pizer*


    * I scored him 2 on violence due to the knife attack on James Willis even though his name was given as Pozer. I scored him 0 on police interest because interest was only brief.


    This is an example of a ‘suspect’ that would have scored fairly high if he didn’t have an alibi for the Double Event which imo eliminates any suspect. William Piggott, would have scored (2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 2 - 0 - 1 = 9) except that he was admitted to the Whitechapel Infirmary, 10th September 1888 (from Commercial Street Police Station) for Delirium Tremens and wasn’t discharged until 9th October which exonerates him of Stride and Eddowes.

    ​​​​​​….

    Ive finished going through Morley’s suspect list and I can’t see any more worth adding (he lists 443 of them btw) but I will add if anyone makes a suggestion.

    ….

    Thoughts requested - I’ve been thinking for a while that I should perhaps change the ‘violence’ criteria to cover only violence against women? I just think it might give a slightly more accurate representation although it will be a pain to go back through them. It was when I had to award Pizer 2 points that I thought that a change might be needed.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post

    youre right. maybrick, van gogh and royal conspiracy suspects are even more ridiculous lol.
    I have to agree with you Abby Maybrick, Van Gogh and royal conspiracy suspects are fantasy suspects.
    Atleast with Wentworth Bellsmith we have someone who was in the area at the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post

    I wouldn't go quite that far Abby. Although I've always thought Bellsmith would be a better suspect for some of the Torso Murders than for the C5. However I doubt he was either Jack or involved in any of the Torso murders. Cheers John
    youre right. maybrick, van gogh and royal conspiracy suspects are even more ridiculous lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post

    thanks herlock and john

    on my list they would all get zeros lol. these are ridiculous suspects along the lines of may brick, van gogh and royal conspiracy.
    I wouldn't go quite that far Abby. Although I've always thought Bellsmith would be a better suspect for some of the Torso Murders than for the C5. However I doubt he was either Jack or involved in any of the Torso murders. Cheers John

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    Hi Abby,

    Buchan - a Marine stores dealer who committed suicide by almost cutting his own head off with a knife on the day of Mary Kelly’s funeral. First named in Criminologist magazine in 1990 by Roger Barber who recently wrote a book. Zero to connect him to the case Abby. I only added him because of the book.

    Dr. Williams - a descendant found a letter to another doctor in which Williams apologises for not being able to meet as he would be attending a clinic in Whitechapel. The letter was dated Sept 8th 1888. He claims that Kelly might have become his lover in Wales and that the murders might have occurred because Williams wife couldn’t have children. Dr. Williams had a breakdown after the Kelly murder. He was 48 at the time of the murders and died in 1926.

    Craig - a Reporter who got in trouble for plagiarising. A modern day author claims that Craig discovered that his wife was a prostitute who went into hiding under the name of Mary Kelly. The author Dr. Weston-Davies wanted to exhume Kelly’s body bt if I recall correctly he’s now given up on the suspect?

    Wentworth Bell-Smith - was favoured by L. Forbes Winslow. Hasn’t been tracked down but he seems to have been the right type. Intriguing but lacking in corroboration.
    thanks herlock and john

    on my list they would all get zeros lol. these are ridiculous suspects along the lines of may brick, van gogh and royal conspiracy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    could anyone give me a nutshell on who the following suspects are and what they got going for them? it would be much appreciated.

    buchan
    dr john williams
    craig
    wentworth bell smith
    Hi Abby,

    Buchan - a Marine stores dealer who committed suicide by almost cutting his own head off with a knife on the day of Mary Kelly’s funeral. First named in Criminologist magazine in 1990 by Roger Barber who recently wrote a book. Zero to connect him to the case Abby. I only added him because of the book.

    Dr. Williams - a descendant found a letter to another doctor in which Williams apologises for not being able to meet as he would be attending a clinic in Whitechapel. The letter was dated Sept 8th 1888. He claims that Kelly might have become his lover in Wales and that the murders might have occurred because Williams wife couldn’t have children. Dr. Williams had a breakdown after the Kelly murder. He was 48 at the time of the murders and died in 1926.

    Craig - a Reporter who got in trouble for plagiarising. A modern day author claims that Craig discovered that his wife was a prostitute who went into hiding under the name of Mary Kelly. The author Dr. Weston-Davies wanted to exhume Kelly’s body bt if I recall correctly he’s now given up on the suspect?

    Wentworth Bell-Smith - was favoured by L. Forbes Winslow. Hasn’t been tracked down but he seems to have been the right type. Intriguing but lacking in corroboration.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Originally posted by Lewis C View Post

    But when he was disturbed, he had already attacked her lower body without first strangling or cutting the throat. With the Ripper, the strangling and throat cutting came first.
    He was actually attacking her when the coppers appeared. It was her scream that drew attention.

    I agree that this wasn`t Ripper like, cos he wasn`t the Ripper, but certainly the closest individual to the Ripper on the suspect list.


    Leave a comment:


  • The Rookie Detective
    replied
    Originally posted by Lewis C View Post

    But when he was disturbed, he had already attacked her lower body without first strangling or cutting the throat. With the Ripper, the strangling and throat cutting came first.

    On your other post that I didn't quote, that's a valid point.
    With Nichols, there's some suggestion that the sequence was the opposite way around; her throat cuts being inflicted last.

    If that's the case, then perhaps the killer of Nichols chose to modify and essentially reverse his attack sequence with Chapman...and the rest is history so to speak...

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    could anyone give me a nutshell on who the following suspects are and what they got going for them? it would be much appreciated.

    buchan
    dr john williams
    craig
    wentworth bell smith
    ​​​Hi Abby

    I don't know much about the others but Wentworth Bellsmith was the other suspect who may have been the Lodger other than Tumblety. He reportedly owned a gun. He walked with a strange knock kneed gait. He reportedly was religious and had a hatred of prostitutes. Not much else is known about Wentworth Bellsmith.

    Cheers John

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X