Originally posted by Lewis C
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rating The Suspects.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
Was not Gull in the area at the time John?
Sure, dismiss him for other reasons that you might favour, but as far as my knowledge of Gull goes, he was in London at the time and could easily have traveled in and around Whitechapel.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
I have to agree with you Abby Maybrick, Van Gogh and royal conspiracy suspects are fantasy suspects.
Atleast with Wentworth Bellsmith we have someone who was in the area at the time.
Sure, dismiss him for other reasons that you might favour, but as far as my knowledge of Gull goes, he was in London at the time and could easily have traveled in and around Whitechapel.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Postcould anyone give me a nutshell on who the following suspects are and what they got going for them? it would be much appreciated.
buchan
dr john williams
craig
wentworth bell smith
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View PostAmmendment #13
--- (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) ---
13 = 2 - 2 - 3 - 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Kelly, James
11 = 2 - 2 - 3 - 0 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Bury, William Henry
10 = 2 - 1 - 2 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 : Grainger, William Grant
09 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Cutbush, Thomas Hayne
09 = 2 - 1 - 4 - 0 - 0 - 2 - 0 - 0 : Deeming, Frederick Bailey
09 = 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 : Hyams, Hyam
09 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Puckridge, Oswald
08 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Kosminski, Aaron (Aron Mordke Kozminski)
08 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Pizer, John "Leather Apron"
08 = 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Lechmere, George Capel Scudamore
08 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 0 : Barnado, Thomas John
O8 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 1 : Thompson, Francis
07 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Chapman, George (Seweryn Antonowicz Kłosowski)
07 = 1 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 : Tumblety, Francis
07 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 2 - 0 - 0 : Smith, G. Wentworth Bell
07 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Cohen, David
07 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Kidney, Michael
06 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 0 : Thompson, Francis
06 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Levy, Jacob
06 = 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Pizer, John
05 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Druitt, Montague John
05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Barnett, Joseph
05 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 1 : Stephenson, Robert Donston (or Roslyn D'Onston)
05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Sutton, Henry Gawen
05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1- 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Buchan, Edward
05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Williams, Dr. John
05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Craig, Francis Spurzheim
04 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Stephen, James Kenneth
04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Bachert, Albert
04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Cross, Charles (Charles Allen Lechmere)
04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Hardiman, James
04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Hutchinson, George
04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Mann, Robert
04 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 : Maybrick, James
04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Le Grand, Charles
04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Maybrick, Michael
03 = 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Sickert, Walter Richard
02 = 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Gull, Sir William Withey
Legend:
(A) Age/physical health
. . . 2 = no issue
. . . 1 = issues possibly creating doubt
. . . 0 = serious issue/ could potentially eliminate
(B) Location/access to murder sites
. . . 2 = no issues
. . . 1 = reasonable travel
. . . 0 = serious doubt
(C) Violence
. . . 4 = killed woman (non-relative) with knife
. . . 3 = killed female relative with knife
. . . 2 = violence with a knife
. . . 1 = violence without a knife
. . . 0 = no known violence
(D) Mental health issues
. . . 2 = serious/violent
. . . 1 = other
. . . 0 = none known
(E) Police interest
. . . 2 = at the time (without exoneration)
. . . 1 = later (within 10 yrs and without exoneration))
. . . 0 = none known or not serious
(F) Hatred/dislike of women/prostitutes
. . . 2 = yes
. . . 1 = link to prostitutes
. . . 0 = none known
(G) Medical/anatomical knowledge (inc. animals)
. . . 1 = yes
. . . 0 = none known
(H) Alcohol/drug issue
. . . 1 = yes
. . . 0 = none known
Suspects Added
Michael Maybrick and John Pizer*
* I scored him 2 on violence due to the knife attack on James Willis even though his name was given as Pozer. I scored him 0 on police interest because interest was only brief.
This is an example of a ‘suspect’ that would have scored fairly high if he didn’t have an alibi for the Double Event which imo eliminates any suspect. William Piggott, would have scored (2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 2 - 0 - 1 = 9) except that he was admitted to the Whitechapel Infirmary, 10th September 1888 (from Commercial Street Police Station) for Delirium Tremens and wasn’t discharged until 9th October which exonerates him of Stride and Eddowes.
….
Ive finished going through Morley’s suspect list and I can’t see any more worth adding (he lists 443 of them btw) but I will add if anyone makes a suggestion.
….
Thoughts requested - I’ve been thinking for a while that I should perhaps change the ‘violence’ criteria to cover only violence against women? I just think it might give a slightly more accurate representation although it will be a pain to go back through them. It was when I had to award Pizer 2 points that I thought that a change might be needed.
deeming should het a zero for number 2. there is serious doubt
Leave a comment:
-
Ammendment #13
--- (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) ---
13 = 2 - 2 - 3 - 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Kelly, James
11 = 2 - 2 - 3 - 0 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Bury, William Henry
10 = 2 - 1 - 2 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 : Grainger, William Grant
09 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Cutbush, Thomas Hayne
09 = 2 - 1 - 4 - 0 - 0 - 2 - 0 - 0 : Deeming, Frederick Bailey
09 = 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 : Hyams, Hyam
09 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Puckridge, Oswald
08 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Kosminski, Aaron (Aron Mordke Kozminski)
08 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Pizer, John "Leather Apron"
08 = 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Lechmere, George Capel Scudamore
08 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 0 : Barnado, Thomas John
O8 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 1 : Thompson, Francis
07 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Chapman, George (Seweryn Antonowicz Kłosowski)
07 = 1 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 : Tumblety, Francis
07 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 2 - 0 - 0 : Smith, G. Wentworth Bell
07 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Cohen, David
07 = 2 - 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 1 : Kidney, Michael
06 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 0 : Thompson, Francis
06 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Levy, Jacob
06 = 2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Pizer, John
05 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Druitt, Montague John
05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Barnett, Joseph
05 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 1 : Stephenson, Robert Donston (or Roslyn D'Onston)
05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Sutton, Henry Gawen
05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1- 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Buchan, Edward
05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Williams, Dr. John
05 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Craig, Francis Spurzheim
04 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Stephen, James Kenneth
04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Bachert, Albert
04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Cross, Charles (Charles Allen Lechmere)
04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Hardiman, James
04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Hutchinson, George
04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Mann, Robert
04 = 2 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 : Maybrick, James
04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Le Grand, Charles
04 = 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 : Maybrick, Michael
03 = 2 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 : Sickert, Walter Richard
02 = 0 - 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 : Gull, Sir William Withey
Legend:
(A) Age/physical health
. . . 2 = no issue
. . . 1 = issues possibly creating doubt
. . . 0 = serious issue/ could potentially eliminate
(B) Location/access to murder sites
. . . 2 = no issues
. . . 1 = reasonable travel
. . . 0 = serious doubt
(C) Violence
. . . 4 = killed woman (non-relative) with knife
. . . 3 = killed female relative with knife
. . . 2 = violence with a knife
. . . 1 = violence without a knife
. . . 0 = no known violence
(D) Mental health issues
. . . 2 = serious/violent
. . . 1 = other
. . . 0 = none known
(E) Police interest
. . . 2 = at the time (without exoneration)
. . . 1 = later (within 10 yrs and without exoneration))
. . . 0 = none known or not serious
(F) Hatred/dislike of women/prostitutes
. . . 2 = yes
. . . 1 = link to prostitutes
. . . 0 = none known
(G) Medical/anatomical knowledge (inc. animals)
. . . 1 = yes
. . . 0 = none known
(H) Alcohol/drug issue
. . . 1 = yes
. . . 0 = none known
Suspects Added
Michael Maybrick and John Pizer*
* I scored him 2 on violence due to the knife attack on James Willis even though his name was given as Pozer. I scored him 0 on police interest because interest was only brief.
This is an example of a ‘suspect’ that would have scored fairly high if he didn’t have an alibi for the Double Event which imo eliminates any suspect. William Piggott, would have scored (2 - 2 - 2 - 0 - 0 - 2 - 0 - 1 = 9) except that he was admitted to the Whitechapel Infirmary, 10th September 1888 (from Commercial Street Police Station) for Delirium Tremens and wasn’t discharged until 9th October which exonerates him of Stride and Eddowes.
….
Ive finished going through Morley’s suspect list and I can’t see any more worth adding (he lists 443 of them btw) but I will add if anyone makes a suggestion.
….
Thoughts requested - I’ve been thinking for a while that I should perhaps change the ‘violence’ criteria to cover only violence against women? I just think it might give a slightly more accurate representation although it will be a pain to go back through them. It was when I had to award Pizer 2 points that I thought that a change might be needed.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
youre right. maybrick, van gogh and royal conspiracy suspects are even more ridiculous lol.
Atleast with Wentworth Bellsmith we have someone who was in the area at the time.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
I wouldn't go quite that far Abby. Although I've always thought Bellsmith would be a better suspect for some of the Torso Murders than for the C5. However I doubt he was either Jack or involved in any of the Torso murders. Cheers John
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
thanks herlock and john
on my list they would all get zeros lol. these are ridiculous suspects along the lines of may brick, van gogh and royal conspiracy.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
Hi Abby,
Buchan - a Marine stores dealer who committed suicide by almost cutting his own head off with a knife on the day of Mary Kelly’s funeral. First named in Criminologist magazine in 1990 by Roger Barber who recently wrote a book. Zero to connect him to the case Abby. I only added him because of the book.
Dr. Williams - a descendant found a letter to another doctor in which Williams apologises for not being able to meet as he would be attending a clinic in Whitechapel. The letter was dated Sept 8th 1888. He claims that Kelly might have become his lover in Wales and that the murders might have occurred because Williams wife couldn’t have children. Dr. Williams had a breakdown after the Kelly murder. He was 48 at the time of the murders and died in 1926.
Craig - a Reporter who got in trouble for plagiarising. A modern day author claims that Craig discovered that his wife was a prostitute who went into hiding under the name of Mary Kelly. The author Dr. Weston-Davies wanted to exhume Kelly’s body bt if I recall correctly he’s now given up on the suspect?
Wentworth Bell-Smith - was favoured by L. Forbes Winslow. Hasn’t been tracked down but he seems to have been the right type. Intriguing but lacking in corroboration.
on my list they would all get zeros lol. these are ridiculous suspects along the lines of may brick, van gogh and royal conspiracy.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Postcould anyone give me a nutshell on who the following suspects are and what they got going for them? it would be much appreciated.
buchan
dr john williams
craig
wentworth bell smith
Buchan - a Marine stores dealer who committed suicide by almost cutting his own head off with a knife on the day of Mary Kelly’s funeral. First named in Criminologist magazine in 1990 by Roger Barber who recently wrote a book. Zero to connect him to the case Abby. I only added him because of the book.
Dr. Williams - a descendant found a letter to another doctor in which Williams apologises for not being able to meet as he would be attending a clinic in Whitechapel. The letter was dated Sept 8th 1888. He claims that Kelly might have become his lover in Wales and that the murders might have occurred because Williams wife couldn’t have children. Dr. Williams had a breakdown after the Kelly murder. He was 48 at the time of the murders and died in 1926.
Craig - a Reporter who got in trouble for plagiarising. A modern day author claims that Craig discovered that his wife was a prostitute who went into hiding under the name of Mary Kelly. The author Dr. Weston-Davies wanted to exhume Kelly’s body bt if I recall correctly he’s now given up on the suspect?
Wentworth Bell-Smith - was favoured by L. Forbes Winslow. Hasn’t been tracked down but he seems to have been the right type. Intriguing but lacking in corroboration.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lewis C View Post
But when he was disturbed, he had already attacked her lower body without first strangling or cutting the throat. With the Ripper, the strangling and throat cutting came first.
I agree that this wasn`t Ripper like, cos he wasn`t the Ripper, but certainly the closest individual to the Ripper on the suspect list.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lewis C View Post
But when he was disturbed, he had already attacked her lower body without first strangling or cutting the throat. With the Ripper, the strangling and throat cutting came first.
On your other post that I didn't quote, that's a valid point.
If that's the case, then perhaps the killer of Nichols chose to modify and essentially reverse his attack sequence with Chapman...and the rest is history so to speak...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Postcould anyone give me a nutshell on who the following suspects are and what they got going for them? it would be much appreciated.
buchan
dr john williams
craig
wentworth bell smith
I don't know much about the others but Wentworth Bellsmith was the other suspect who may have been the Lodger other than Tumblety. He reportedly owned a gun. He walked with a strange knock kneed gait. He reportedly was religious and had a hatred of prostitutes. Not much else is known about Wentworth Bellsmith.
Cheers John
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: