Rating The Suspects.

[Trevor Marriott]

But Trevor you said that you had information “which showed a Carl Feigenbaum was still employed by this merchant line, and he was in London on one of their ships in 1891”

What is the actual evidence that he was provably in London in 1891?

From memory, it was a crew list for one of the Norduetcher Line merchant ships.

https://www.trevormarriott.co.uk

[Herlock Sholmes]

From memory, it was a crew list for one of the Norduetcher Line merchant ships.

www.trevormarriott.co.uk

But you didn’t photograph it? When you’re looking for evidence that your suspect spent at least some time in London?

[Trevor Marriott]

But you didn’t photograph it? When you’re looking for evidence that your suspect spent at least some time in London?

There is more than enough evidence which shows he was in London at the time of the murders and I have seen the crew list for him being here in 1891.

https://www.trevormarriott.co.uk

[Herlock Sholmes]

There is more than enough evidence which shows he was in London at the time of the murders and I have seen the crew list for him being here in 1891.

www.trevormarriott.co.uk

Him telling Lawton isn’t reliable evidence Trevor. I’m struggling to see why you haven’t produced that crew list though Trevor? Surely that would be a basic requirement for evidence of anything? If I said that I’d seen a note in Broadmoor’s record which said “Sir Melville Macnaghten came today to speak to Jack the Ripper but Cutbush wouldn’t talk to him” would you just accept my word or would you expect me to produce a copy of that note?