Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes
View Post
Rating The Suspects.
Collapse
X
-
👍 1 -
Originally posted by Lewis C View Post
It looks to me that we do know that Sickert was in France before and after the Chapman murder, but I suppose that if we only have to account for one murder, there's an outside chance he could have gone to England and then back to France without us knowing it. And maybe someone would argue that maybe Chapman wasn't a Ripper murder, though that someone wouldn't be me.
👍 1Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
Yes and we know for a fact that Sickert did return to England but it looks like we just can’t pin down exactly when. The best that can be said about Feigenbaum is that it’s not physically impossible that he could have come to England but this is the same approach that Dale Larner takes with Van Gogh.
👍 1Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lewis C View Post
I guess the counter-argument would be that Sickert was in France, but Feigenbaum was in the US, which is much further?
👍 1Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lewis C View PostI could even accept something less than complete certainty that he was in England at the time if that's clearly the most likely scenario. However, if someone lived in the US but could have been in England because he was a seaman, that's not good enough for me. But again, I have just as much of a problem with Sickert, who we know was in France on 3 or 4 days during the period of the 1st 4 C5 murders, and I believe no evidence that he ever left France during that period.
👍 1Leave a comment:
-
I could even accept something less than complete certainty that he was in England at the time if that's clearly the most likely scenario. However, if someone lived in the US but could have been in England because he was a seaman, that's not good enough for me. But again, I have just as much of a problem with Sickert, who we know was in France on 3 or 4 days during the period of the 1st 4 C5 murders, and I believe no evidence that he ever left France during that period.
👍 1Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Rookie Detective View PostI think the following article from 1896, and the fact it mentions Jack the Ripper, should be enough to confirm an authentic association/connection with Jack the Ripper and Feigenbaum...
The sheer mention of Feigenbaum in this context should allow him to be permitted into/remain on, the list of suspects on this thread.
Just my opinion of course.
If you read CJ Morley’s suspect book he has over 500 names most of whom are just men who claimed to have been the ripper or who accused by someone of being the ripper. I’m not going to remove Feigenbaum from the list because I’ll just get post after post accusing me of doing it just because it’s Trevor’s suspect but I’ll say this….we apply various criteria to suspects and the absolute ‘should go without saying one’ would have to be ‘proven to have been in the same country at the same time that the murders occurred.’ We can’t say this for Feigenbaum.
👍 2Leave a comment:
-
I think the following article from 1896, and the fact it mentions Jack the Ripper, should be enough to confirm an authentic association/connection with Jack the Ripper and Feigenbaum...
The sheer mention of Feigenbaum in this context should allow him to be permitted into/remain on, the list of suspects on this thread.
Just my opinion of course.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
Yes, in 1897 and what is your point of mentioning that 12 months after Feigenbaum was executed?
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
So…..we have the word of a known murder told to a potentially mentally unbalanced lawyer whilst in prison. The lawyer takes this semi-confession to the papers rather than contacting Scotland Yard (hardly noble behaviour from a man of the law). Then later, not a single piece of evidence exists to prove that this ‘suspect’ was even in England at the time of the murders. All that you have is evidence that the suspect worked for a certain shipping line and that this shipping line had a ship or ships that went to London three years after most people consider the murders to have ended (but you can’t even prove that the suspect was actually on one of them)
You call this the best suspect?!?!
👍 2Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
I was talking about Feigenbaum. But come to think of it..didn’t Lawton commit suicide?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
Now Now Herlock calling his lawyer who defended him in a murder trial a bit of looney is out of order even for you !!!!!!!!!
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
But it looks like you have no proof of him being there except for the words of a bit of a looney.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
But he did admit to being in London at the time of the murders
I then looked up the dates of the Whitechapel murders and selected two. When I saw Feigenbaum again and was talking with him I said: "Carl, were you in London from this date to that one," naming those selected. "Yes", he answered, and relapsed into silence. I then communicated with London and discovered that Feigenbaum was also there when other women fell victim to the knife of some mysterious assassin.”
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
So…as I suspected Trevor…he worked for a company that had a ship in London around 3 years after the time that most believed the murders to have ended. You can’t prove though that he himself was on a specific ship at a specific time that took him to England
If a suspect can’t be proven to have been in the same country that the murders occurred in, at the time that they occurred then they can’t be considered a suspect. You can use all the !!!!!!! that you want to.
I then looked up the dates of the Whitechapel murders and selected two. When I saw Feigenbaum again and was talking with him I said: "Carl, were you in London from this date to that one," naming those selected. "Yes", he answered, and relapsed into silence. I then communicated with London and discovered that Feigenbaum was also there when other women fell victim to the knife of some mysterious assassin.”
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: