Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Seaside Home?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • robhouse
    replied
    This is my understanding of the beats of Watkins and Harvey.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    Originally posted by Wolf Vanderlinden View Post
    Right. Whatever.

    Wolf.
    I owe you an apology Wolf. I got confused with White.

    Sorry

    Monty

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    Off Duty

    Originally posted by Robert View Post
    Sacked for being Jack the Ripper while on duty would probably be the worst.
    I suspect that, even off duty, it would be frowned upon somewhat!

    Leave a comment:


  • Wolf Vanderlinden
    replied
    Sagar is incorrect.
    Right. Whatever.

    Wolf.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    honest

    Hello Neil. Thanks. Looks like he had no difficulty articulating how he felt.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    Phil,

    The majority was drunk on duty, usually after so many warnings.

    The worst was Hutt who struck a prisoner whilst in the dock at Moor Lane court. Others include bribery, assaulting a sergeant/fellow constable, neglect of duty (usually being caught in the pub) and AWOL.

    Lynn,

    Mostly he (Smith) initials however if he has something to say he will do.

    The one that springs to mind is again Hutt, who asked for a parchment of reccomendation. Basically Smith noted upon Hutts records, in red ink, that he thought Hutt was a bit cheeky in asking for one (after what he had done at Moor Lane) and that he wasnt going to authorise it.

    Monty

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Smith

    Hello Neil. Did he merely affix his signature or actually interject comments?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Originally posted by Robert View Post
    Sacked for being Jack the Ripper while on duty would probably be the worst.
    LOL! Dont think Monty has found one like that!

    Regards

    Phil

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    Sacked for being Jack the Ripper while on duty would probably be the worst.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Hello Monty,

    What are the worst reasons you have seen from this period? I just wondered where the line was drawn for actually recording the fact, if any?

    Regards

    Phil

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    Thanks Monty.

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    PC Records

    Hi,

    Its not unusual for records to be missing or part missing.

    Its happened with quite a few Bobbies and is down to a combination of poor record maintenence, deterioration, space and yes, the blitz.

    Monty


    PS - My experience for those dismissed for serious offences, is that Henry Smiths scrawl in red ink appears.
    Last edited by Monty; 04-03-2012, 02:50 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    Hi Phil

    I don't know how common it is for a reason for dismissal to be absent from the record. If it is very uncommon, then it would be suggestive. But if the authorities were trying to keep something hidden, wouldn't they just invent a reason for the record?

    Remember "John Drake"? I think he had Harvey in the frame.

    Samsonite briefcase!

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Originally posted by Robert View Post
    I still find it odd that two of the policemen who gave evidence at the Eddowes inquest were both dismissed same month same year.
    Hello Robert,

    A theorist's dream set up! Until anything else is found- it will just be an oddity.

    Kind wishes

    Phil

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    I still find it odd that two of the policemen who gave evidence at the Eddowes inquest were both dismissed same month same year.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X