Interesting about this huge petition demanding a re-run. Why wasn't the petition launched before the referendum? After all, its signers knew the terms of the referendum. So why did they not protest before the voting?
Could it be that they smugly assumed they'd win?
Anyway, they've made it clear that if they don't get their own way, they'll scweam and scweam and scweam.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
EU Vote
Collapse
X
-
I wouldn't have thought it likely. If it happens it will lead to a general election, since the tory brexiteers will side with the Labour Party and Scots Nats on all future House of Commons votes. There's nothing that concentrates an MP's mind like the possible loss of his job. Brussels would have to give the tory remainers mega bribes to get them to do that.
Leave a comment:
-
I keep thinking that if Scotland is now requesting a second go at the independence referendum, out of a sense of fairness they should also ask for a special referendum for the northern isles of Scotland to vote if they wish to remain part of Scotland (technically "the kingdom of Scotland and the isles") or return to their previous owner, Denmark.
Jeff
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View PostBy the way, don't rule out a 2nd vote 100%, while unlikely, it will be debated in Westminster next week.
I'm often scared though walking around looking at folk and thinking my God they actually were allowed to vote..
Leave a comment:
-
Hi All
the scariest thing about all of this, and a response to the "that is democracy line," is the woman interviewed last night on the BBC.
Now while others interviewed gave their reasons for voting leave, this woman said " i don't know why i voted to leave, i just did." if not the exact words very close to.
When massive constitutional issues are decided on in that fashion, it makes it clear why often a a two thirds majority is needed for such changes. why there was not such a requirement here I cannot understand!
For a trades union to go on strike it takes more than 50% and to remove a government in the UK at present needs 2/3 of the house, it seems the government were so arrogant and sure of victory, they did not put this in place.
You could have had a situation where 1 side beat the other by JUST ONE vote, that cannot be right no matter which way you voted.
We will see over the following months the short sightedness or not of this decision.
By the way, don't rule out a 2nd vote 100%, while unlikely, it will be debated in Westminster next week.
steve
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostQuite correct there will be no 2nd vote from Britain, but I took (perhaps mistook?) Robert to mean the rest of Europe should have their chance to vote just like Britain. From what I understand many ordinary European folk don't like what is being imposed on them by the EU elite.
There will, I think, be a 2nd vote for independence in Scotland.
Cheers John
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Graham
As I recall, after the defeat of Napoleon the victorious Powers forced Belgium (which used to be called the Austrian Netherlands) and Holland to fuse together into one state, as an attempted bulwark against any future French expansion. The Belgians and Dutch didn't like it much. As compensation for giving up the Austrian Netherlands, Austria was given Venetia in northern Italy. I don't think the Venetians liked it much either.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Robert View PostAs I understand it, the 'Common Market' was devised basically to prevent further war breaking out between continental European nations
Diplomatically put, Graham. I don't think they were too worried about the Belgians attacking the Dutch, or France attacking Luxembourg.
Graham
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by John Wheat View PostI voted to remain. However the people have spoken and any talk of a second referendum is bullshit. I expect Britain to leave the EU as soon as possible.
There will, I think, be a 2nd vote for independence in Scotland.
Leave a comment:
-
As I understand it, the 'Common Market' was devised basically to prevent further war breaking out between continental European nations
Diplomatically put, Graham. I don't think they were too worried about the Belgians attacking the Dutch, or France attacking Luxembourg.
Leave a comment:
-
As I understand it, the 'Common Market' was devised basically to prevent further war breaking out between continental European nations, and to make everyone feel as though they were part of a whole the interchange of commerce was developed. If I remember correctly, Britain first applied to join in 1961 when MacMillan was PM, and we didn't get in until de Gaulle was dead and buried. He despised Britain, even though we won his country back for him, and was not prepared to permit us to be part of his club. As I said in an earlier post, I never felt 'European' and I think that probably goes for the greater part of the population of these Isles. But Ted Heath made it is life's ambition to get us in, and in we went. OK, membership of the EU has been swings and roundabouts: good, bad and plain bloody silly sometimes, but I do ask myself what real, lasting benefit we got out of it.
Graham
Leave a comment:
-
I voted to remain. However the people have spoken and any talk of a second referendum is bullshit. I expect Britain to leave the EU as soon as possible.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Jon
Yes indeed, they don't like democracy.
I would suggest that the ideal course, to minimise uncertainty, would be to have an EU-wide referendum on the same day, with voters choosing whether they want their countries to stay or leave.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Graham View Post
Anyway, it's done now. And if anyone should think that the result of the Referendum was nothing to do with uncontrolled EU-policy immigration, let them think again. I'm now wondering which EU country will be the next to have a referendum - I think I might wander down to Coral's later and see what sort of odds I can get!
Graham
I grew up in England when Enoch Powell was pushing for restricted immigration, there has always been a ground-swell of opinion along that score in England, now it has surfaced as never before.
None of this may have happened if the World powers had moved against Hasad in the first place.
I see the widespread migration of Syrians because of Hasad's policies as being the spark that led to this Brexit vote, in an indirect fashion of course.
Every country must retain the right to control it's own borders, and no country should be required to adopt laws and policies created in some 'foreign' (EU) board-room.Last edited by Wickerman; 06-25-2016, 05:44 AM.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: