Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Fiver View Post
So you're claiming a Conspiracy that was able to plant fake ID's in Oswald's wallet, forge purchase records, bank records, photographic evidence, witness testimony and ballistics evidence was too stupid to plant the correct rifle? And that they compounded the stupidity by letting multiple newsmen take still and motion pictures of the wrong rifle?
Who's running this Conspiracy - Moe, Larry and Curly?
If Weitzman had been talking to Mark Lane…then I’d have been suspicious.
And this is a man that believes Beverley Oliver, Ricky White and Roger Craig are truthful, instead of the unhinged liars that they undoubtedly all are. It’s also from the person who is the last man on planet Earth that still thinks that the Knight/Sickert theory is real. Always a conspiracy note.Last edited by Herlock Sholmes; Today, 04:41 PM.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View PostAnd, as everyone agreed, the Mannlicher and the Mauser are easily mistaken. So he made a simple errror and was honest enough to admit it. Fishy though thinks that this is ‘dishonesty.’ To admit to an easily understandable error is apparently a sign of dishonesty.
Imagine if people lived like that.
The junk mail spelled my name wrong - it must be a Conspiracy. I told the waiter no pickles on my sandwich - it must be a Conspiracy. That driver didn't signal when they changed lanes - it must be a Conspiracy.
Yet when it comes to JFK that's exactly how they behave. The date was miswritten - it must be a Conspiracy. Witnesses disagreed on the color of a jacket - it must be a Conspiracy. Someone misidentified a photo - it must be a Conspiracy."The full picture always needs to be given. When this does not happen, we are left to make decisions on insufficient information." - Christer Holmgren
"Unfortunately, when one becomes obsessed by a theory, truth and logic rarely matter." - Steven Blomer
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fiver View Post
So you're claiming a Conspiracy that was able to plant fake ID's in Oswald's wallet, forge purchase records, bank records, photographic evidence, witness testimony and ballistics evidence was too stupid to plant the correct rifle? And that they compounded the stupidity by letting multiple newsmen take still and motion pictures of the wrong rifle?
Who's running this Conspiracy - Moe, Larry and Curly?
Once you accept the Autopsy photos are fake as we have shown you all along, then you can move on .
The warren commission lied , you just won't accept it . .
The debate side of this thread is over ,only the "evidence " is on show . The squabblers can argue amongst themselves.
More to come.'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
You have to notice Fiver. No actual discussion or debate. No analysis or assessment. Nothing. Just a repeated posting of things that have been explained and rebutted a thousand times.
And this is a man that believes Beverley Oliver, Ricky White and Roger Craig are truthful, instead of the unhinged liars that they undoubtedly all are.
The Warren Commission Report Chapter 3 Page 81:
The rifle is 40.2 inches long and weighs 8 pounds.
Where is the rear open sight illustrated in the Klein's advertisement?
Bearing in mind your accusation towards Fishy in your post 3240, "You, and others, believe in conspiracy which is wholly reliant on calling people liars. Of yelling fake, fraud, forgery and he was in on it", can you proffer your thousand rebuttals with an explanation as to who is lying?Last edited by GBinOz; Today, 08:47 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fiver View Post
Some of these posters seem to believe that humans are incapable of error unless they are part of a Conspiracy, since they treat every error as proof of a Conspiracy.
Imagine if people lived like that.
The junk mail spelled my name wrong - it must be a Conspiracy. I told the waiter no pickles on my sandwich - it must be a Conspiracy. That driver didn't signal when they changed lanes - it must be a Conspiracy.
Yet when it comes to JFK that's exactly how they behave. The date was miswritten - it must be a Conspiracy. Witnesses disagreed on the color of a jacket - it must be a Conspiracy. Someone misidentified a photo - it must be a Conspiracy.
Another perfect example was in the autopsy room when someone said “who’s in charge here?” and a senior military man said “I am.”
It’s immediately taken as meaning that this person controlled and limited the inquest. The evidence tells us that wasn’t the case. I know that at least one witness believed that it was Admiral Burkley who replied. Clearly he was just talking about the overall situation. Bugliosi went into the autopsy in minute detail. No one influenced the three pathologists. They were under pressure…yes. The family were constantly calling and asking how long?…yes. But no one controlled or limited the autopsy. It’s a fallacy.
Another ignored point (among hundreds) is about those pathologists. Boswell had no experience of dealing with gun shot fatalities and Humes had only limited experience. Ideal for a conspiracy you might think. So why did Humes, of his own bat, call in Finck due to his experience of gun shot wounds. Doesn’t sound like the actions of someone intent on covering up.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
3500 and you've learnt little.
Once you accept the Autopsy photos are fake as we have shown you all along, then you can move on .
The warren commission lied , you just won't accept it . .
The debate side of this thread is over ,only the "evidence " is on show . The squabblers can argue amongst themselves.
More to come.
You aren’t debating. You cutting and pasting and then making one or two sentence comments. If that’s all that you can manage. Fine.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
Let's address an easy one.
The Warren Commission Report Chapter 3 Page 81:
The rifle is 40.2 inches long and weighs 8 pounds.
Where is the rear open sight illustrated in the Klein's advertisement?
Bearing in mind your accusation towards Fishy in your post 3240, "You, and others, believe in conspiracy which is wholly reliant on calling people liars. Of yelling fake, fraud, forgery and he was in on it", can you proffer your thousand rebuttals with an explanation as to who is lying?
Here’s a second suggestion. How can you know that Oswald had one rifle in the photograph and then acquired another? Why does it have to be the same rifle?
These are quibbles.
Oswald had a rifle…confirmed by Marina and Ruth Paine. After the assassination it was gone. It was the rifle that he carried to work that day. And he certainly didn’t shot Kennedy with a pack of non-existent curtain rods.
Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
You haven’t shown that the autopsy photos are fake. You just keep saying it. Repeating something doesn’t make it true.
You aren’t debating. You cutting and pasting and then making one or two sentence comments. If that’s all that you can manage. Fine.
I dont know who's head that is with that tiny hole ,but it ain't jfks . That by now is a well established fact . The experts at parkland hospital on the day all agree.'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
Comment