JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year

[Herlock Sholmes]

So you're claiming a Conspiracy that was able to plant fake ID's in Oswald's wallet, forge purchase records, bank records, photographic evidence, witness testimony and ballistics evidence was too stupid to plant the correct rifle? And that they compounded the stupidity by letting multiple newsmen take still and motion pictures of the wrong rifle?

Who's running this Conspiracy - Moe, Larry and Curly?

[Herlock Sholmes]

So you're claiming a Conspiracy that was able to plant fake ID's in Oswald's wallet, forge purchase records, bank records, photographic evidence, witness testimony and ballistics evidence was too stupid to plant the correct rifle? And that they compounded the stupidity by letting multiple newsmen take still and motion pictures of the wrong rifle?

Who's running this Conspiracy - Moe, Larry and Curly?

You have to notice Fiver. No actual discussion or debate. No analysis or assessment. Nothing. Just a repeated posting of things that have been explained and rebutted a thousand times. We are at the stage where one poster is simply seeing something online and as long as it ‘confirms’ his viewpoint he’s assuming it to have been true. This person berates and disbelieves a police officer who, if he’d bothered to read, simply saw the rifle on the floor between piles of boxes from a few feet away. And, as everyone agreed, the Mannlicher and the Mauser are easily mistaken. So he made a simple errror and was honest enough to admit it. Fishy though thinks that this is ‘dishonesty.’ To admit to an easily understandable error is apparently a sign of dishonesty.

If Weitzman had been talking to Mark Lane…then I’d have been suspicious.

And this is a man that believes Beverley Oliver, Ricky White and Roger Craig are truthful, instead of the unhinged liars that they undoubtedly all are. It’s also from the person who is the last man on planet Earth that still thinks that the Knight/Sickert theory is real. Always a conspiracy note.

[Fiver]

And, as everyone agreed, the Mannlicher and the Mauser are easily mistaken. So he made a simple errror and was honest enough to admit it. Fishy though thinks that this is ‘dishonesty.’ To admit to an easily understandable error is apparently a sign of dishonesty.

Some of these posters seem to believe that humans are incapable of error unless they are part of a Conspiracy, since they treat every error as proof of a Conspiracy.

Imagine if people lived like that.

The junk mail spelled my name wrong - it must be a Conspiracy. I told the waiter no pickles on my sandwich - it must be a Conspiracy. That driver didn't signal when they changed lanes - it must be a Conspiracy.

Yet when it comes to JFK that's exactly how they behave. The date was miswritten - it must be a Conspiracy. Witnesses disagreed on the color of a jacket - it must be a Conspiracy. Someone misidentified a photo - it must be a Conspiracy.