Originally posted by Ms Diddles
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
John Richardson
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Fleetwood Mac View Post
Hmmm, I'm not convinced you've asked the probing questions, Trevor, and it seems you don't want this explored.
In this post I've replied to you state: in other words, a more accurate estimation ends up being less precise. So, what exactly does this mean for a body with a very short PMI and an estimated TOD between 2 and 3 hours or 2 and 4 hours?
In addition, as I stated, Dr Biggs makes reference to a paramedic "unaccustomed to manipulating dead bodies". What does this mean in relation to Dr Phillips? I don't think it is sufficient to suggest that Dr Phillips' observation that rigor was commencing of the limbs is pretty much useless because of someone "unaccustomed to manipulating dead bodies".
Now, it may well turn out that Dr Biggs can add some more meat to the bones and as a result the penny drops and it all becomes clear. As it stands, however, we're not at that point.
I am more than happy to leave it there, Trevor, but I think you and I have entirely different standards when it comes to probing questions, scrutiny and accepting what is put before us.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fleetwood Mac View Post
I am more than happy to leave it there, Trevor, but I think you and I have entirely different standards when it comes to probing questions, scrutiny and accepting what is put before us.
The TOD issue is over. Not for you of course because you have an agenda. There’s nothing that any expert could tell us that would cause you to have a sudden attack of integrity.
Phillips is now surplus to requirements. So you can now focus on inventing issues with the witnesses.
Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
My own personal opinion and it is only an opinion and is based on my unbiased appraisal of all the evidence is that Chapman was murdered within Dr Phillips timeframe, but the real truth will never be known.
www.trevormarriott.co.uk'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
My own personal opinion and it is only an opinion and is based on my unbiased appraisal of all the evidence is that Chapman was murdered within Dr Phillips timeframe, but the real truth will never be known.
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Cheers, GeorgeThe needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.
Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm
Comment
-
From the time the body was discovered it became a police investigation,and that investigation would naturaly take note of the inquest proceedings.Phillips was a Police surgeon,acting on behalf of the police.I find no evidence that the police discounted the time of death given by Phillips or that they preferred the evidence of Long and Caduse over that of Phillips.Quite the contrary.To help the police,woul be the written statement of Phillips,something that is not available to us.Just another point in favour of Phillips,The police view.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Macdonald Triad View PostFishy, are you actually using for a profile pic a real shot of the backyard? Not some poofy sketch? Well done. Think the TK murders could happen there [basement] and be whisked away in packing crates? John Richardson and his Mum beats Lechmere/Cross any day of the week and twice on Sunday.'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
Originally posted by harry View PostFrom the time the body was discovered it became a police investigation,and that investigation would naturaly take note of the inquest proceedings.Phillips was a Police surgeon,acting on behalf of the police.I find no evidence that the police discounted the time of death given by Phillips or that they preferred the evidence of Long and Caduse over that of Phillips.Quite the contrary.To help the police,woul be the written statement of Phillips,something that is not available to us.Just another point in favour of Phillips,The police view.
''I am mystified that our opinions cause such a gnashing of teeth and rending of garments and demands for compliance from those who claim to have a 100% correct answer for every component of the evidence.'' GBinOz #2634.
2x Mystified.'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
The Coroner favored Cadosche and Long.3 witnesses points to a murder past 5 am, no matter if Long and Cadosche's times were off by 15 minutes one way or another.Meanwhile witnesses before a 5 am murder does not exist and has no basis.As posted before the doctors were of no help.There should be no arguments as to when the murder occured based on known facts\info.Unless the before 5 am murder believers come up with a witness there is nothing more to be said.Last edited by Varqm; 09-01-2022, 05:58 AM.Clearly the first human laws (way older and already established) spawned organized religion's morality - from which it's writers only copied/stole,ex. you cannot kill,rob,steal (forced,it started civil society).
M. Pacana
Comment
-
Originally posted by Varqm View PostThe Coroner favored Cadosche and Long.3 witnesses points to a murder past 5 am, no matter if Long and Cadosche's times were off by 15 minutes one way or another.Meanwhile witnesses before a 5 am murder does not exist and has no basis.As posted before the doctors were of no help.There should be no arguments as to when the murder occured based on known facts\info.Unless the before 5 am murder believers come up with a witness there is nothing more to be said.
We can't use the witnesses when it suits ,and dismiss them altogether when it doesn't
Either their all reliable, or as George's #1320 post clearly point out, .They can be just as unreliable as 1888 drs medical opinions are .
Now there really is nothing more to be said on that fact.
'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
Originally posted by harry View PostFrom the time the body was discovered it became a police investigation,and that investigation would naturaly take note of the inquest proceedings.Phillips was a Police surgeon,acting on behalf of the police.I find no evidence that the police discounted the time of death given by Phillips or that they preferred the evidence of Long and Caduse over that of Phillips.Quite the contrary.To help the police,woul be the written statement of Phillips,something that is not available to us.Just another point in favour of Phillips,The police view.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
Comment