Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chapmanís death.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I like the bold type, i think someones challenged at reading ,sorry that your comprehension is a bit off today Harry .

    Comment


    • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
      i like the bold type , and no not shouting . as far as the ''no'' and the noise codosch heard, i guess it depends on whether you believe that at that precise moment of the ''no'' is when Annie met her demise. so do you ?
      Whether you like bold type or not, it is generally considered to be shouting and therefore rude and unacceptable.

      I don't know when Annie Chapman was murdered. When she was murdered and if the bump against the fence was connected to her murder is what some people are trying to establish. But what I asked is why it is 'almost impossible' for the murderer to have bumped against the fence.


      Comment


      • Whether you like bold type or not, it is generally considered to be shouting and therefore rude and unacceptable.
        Probably the most ridiculous thing ive heard on this thread, ''rude and unacceptable''.... way too precious . Just read the content and not the way its typed for god sake.

        Comment


        • I
          don't know when Annie Chapman was murdered. When she was murdered and if the bump against the fence was connected to her murder is what some people are trying to establish. But what I asked is why it is 'almost impossible' for the murderer to have bumped against the fence.
          Well when you do know something about Annie Chapman ill be sure and let you know why .

          Comment


          • Originally posted by PaulB View Post

            I don't know when Annie Chapman was murdered.

            Good.

            Do you agree or not with Herlock's :

            5.25-5.30 beyond all reasonable doubt


            ?!



            The Baron

            Comment


            • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

              As ive explain to you the murderer making the noise against the fence is almost impossible. But as always ignore ignore ignore.


              THE REST OF YOUR POST IS JUST REPEATED GIBBERISH IM AFRAID, NOT WORTH MY TIME TO EXPLAIN TO YOU AGAIN . ITS JUST AS LIKELY CHAPMAN WAS KILLED AT THE EARLIER TIME OF 3.30 / 4.00 BASED ON DR PHILLIPS T.O.D, AND THE AS ALWAYS UNRELIABLE AND VERY CONTRADICTORY WITNESS TESTIMONIES OF LONG, CODOCSH AND RICHARDSON.

              MANY THANKS FOR WOLF VANDERLINDIN FOR MAKING THAT PLAINLY OBVIOUS.

              Just saying that youíve explained something doesnít mean that your explanation was a good one. Which it wasnít. Your childish explanations can be dismissed. Youíve said:

              - There was a one metre gap between Annieís body and the fence.

              This is wildly untrue as the merest glimpse of any of the photographs shows.

              - The killer would have been on Annieís right and so couldnít have brushed against the fence.

              This is pure speculation. Worse than that though, youíre using a falsehood to bolster a theory (and not for the first time either)

              - Phillips TOD estimation can be assumed to be correct.

              This is a lie. I refuse to dress it up in any other terms. I, and others, have produced mountains of cast-iron, rock solid, unarguable evidence from the authorities on the subject that this isnít the case. Iíll ask you again Fishy......what gives you the right to contradict the genuine experts on this subject when you have no medical qualifications or knowledge. And pleeeeese do not use your pathetic - well doctors got it right three times argument - which is invalid, childish nonsense. If it was a valid argument Doctors would have changed their textbooks.... but they havenít! Your opinion on this matter doesnít count. Neither does mine. But Iím afraid that cannot be said of Jason Payne-James or Sir Keith Simpson. Answer the question.....what makes you an authority on Forensic medicine? (This goes for Professor Baron too by the way?)

              - Because Cadosch was cautious about hearing the no we should dismiss him as unreliable.

              Has anyone ever heard such anti-logical drivel? It beggars belief that an adult can say something like this.


              Im not going to bother with the rest of your unintelligible waffle. Phillips can and should be dismissed. Only the foolish or biased desperately rely on him. Witness outweigh him as anyone of judgment would agree.

              It is beyond reasonable doubt that Annie was killed at around 5.25-5.30. The evidence for this is overwhelming. The evidence for 4.30 is non-existent.




              Regards

              Herlock






              "Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell.”

              Comment


              • -
                The killer would have been on Annieís right and so couldnít have brushed against the fence.

                This is pure speculation. Worse than that though, youíre using a falsehood to bolster a theory (and not for the first time either)

                So the killer wasn't on Annies right ?


                The rest of your post was just more gibberish, already explained to you ,so ill just pick and choose to avoid wasting my time

                Comment


                • Originally posted by The Baron View Post


                  Good.

                  Do you agree or not with Herlock's :

                  5.25-5.30 beyond all reasonable doubt

                  The Baron
                  If you are taking a poll, I think in all likelihood Annie Chapman was murdered at about 5.30. The combined witness statements are more compelling to me than a doctor using a known unreliable method of guesstimating the TOD. I stop short of asserting that is proven beyond all reasonable doubt but not a long way short.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

                    Probably the most ridiculous thing ive heard on this thread, ''rude and unacceptable''.... way too precious . Just read the content and not the way its typed for god sake.
                    I am stating long-established netiquette, but if you think good manners is 'ridiculous' and 'precious' then maybe that reveals something about you. It's no matter to me. And I do read the content, unedifying as it is from time to time.

                    Comment


                    • I am stating long-established netiquette, but if you think good manners is 'ridiculous' and 'precious' then maybe that reveals something about you. It's no matter to me. And I do read the content, unedifying as it is from time to time.
                      if its no matter to you , why then are you making such a big thing about it ? typing in bold is not rude, there just bold letters, how on earth you can tell it reveals anything at all about me is staggering

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
                        I

                        Well when you do know something about Annie Chapman ill be sure and let you know why .
                        Actually, I do know something about Annie Chapman. However, all I asked was why it was 'almost impossible' for the murderer to have caused the bump against the fence, and you've done nothing but avoid answering it. Why? It wasn't a difficult question, it isn't unusual when someone says something for another person to politely ask for clarification. Why are you avoiding answering my question?

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

                          if its no matter to you , why then are you making such a big thing about it ? typing in bold is not rude, there just bold letters, how on earth you can tell it reveals anything at all about me is staggering
                          I'm not making a big thing out of anything. I simply pointed out typing in bold is regarded as shouting and that shouting at people is rude. I haven't made this up. It is long established nettiquet. It's not my fault if you don't know that. And there is nothing staggering about drawing conclusions about someone who says they don't care if their behaviour is perceived as rude, it's simple common sense. But forget about it, shout away.

                          Comment


                          • i like the bold type , and no not shouting . as far as the ''no'' and the noise codosch heard, i guess it depends on whether you believe that at that precise moment of the ''no'' is when Annie met her demise. so do you ?

                            ''i guess it depends on whether you believe that at that precise moment of the ''no'' is when Annie met her demise. so do you ''?

                            neither was this a difficult question , but i got no answer .

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by The Baron View Post


                              Good.

                              Do you agree or not with Herlock's :

                              5.25-5.30 beyond all reasonable doubt


                              ?!



                              The Baron
                              Oddly enough, I just said that I didn't know when Annie Chapman died, from which one could infer that I don't agree or disagree with Herlock. However, if Dr Phillips's estimated time of death is untenable, and there seems to be good reasons for supposing that it is, then it is necessary to consider the time of death suggested by the witness testimony. Don't you consider that that is the proper approach to take? It is certainly the approach I have taken, and I think it is also the approach Herlock has taken, although he has presented medical opinion which he finds acceptable but on which I am not qualified to comment and he has accordingly reached a firmer conclusion that I have. He has further argued, plausibly I think, that some commentators want Dr Phillips' estimated time of death to be correct because it suits theories they already hold.

                              Comment


                              • I'm not making a big thing out of anything. I simply pointed out typing in bold is regarded as shouting and that shouting at people is rude. I haven't made this up. It is long established nettiquet. It's not my fault if you don't know that. And there is nothing staggering about drawing conclusions about someone who says they don't care if their behaviour is perceived as rude, it's simple common sense. But forget about it, shout away.
                                Ooooh im fully aware thats what the bold type is interpreted as , i just choose not to play along with such a ridiculous notion that bold type is in some way offensive , i type in bold because i like it , simple . if people have a problem with it thats their problem not mine .

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X