On the subject of Barnett's identification, I think it sound. He insisted that he could identify the victim as Kelly and he said why that was the case. Lighting is not an issue for me. (I could identify my wife just by looking at her toes.)
If the object of the mutilation had been to conceal the identity of the victim it would surely have been easier - and quicker - to set fire to the bed?
If the object of the mutilation had been to conceal the identity of the victim it would surely have been easier - and quicker - to set fire to the bed?
Comment