Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Limerick, the Key?
Collapse
X
-
give and take
Hello Debs. That's true enough. But imagine what it's like when NONE of them agree with you, given your take.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Jon. Thanks.
"if you type "six brothers living" into the Press Reports Search window you'll see a few different versions of that."
Absolutely. But, as I said, if you like newspaper stories . . .
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostI presume that their junket was "on the house"? Just had a colleague return from a week in England, including a couple days at Oxford. His remark, "It's amazing how comfortable one can make oneself on other people's money."
Yes, I remember a quick Q&A article with Mel Brooks in a London newspaper and when asked what his favourite food was he said 'If you're paying I like sirloin steak with Chateaux Lafitte 1953. If I'm paying I like cabbage and potatoes'.
Hi Debra
Thanks for your studied reply to my question earlier.
Leave a comment:
-
Manchester
Just on the off-chance that the story did originate in Manchester, I've had a look for Kelly families in that area in the 1871 census. Living at 15, Back Lane, Blackley is a John Kelly, married to Elizabeth. The children are Mary (7), Hannah (5) & Henry (1 month). John was born in Manchester & the children in Blackley. Elizabeth (& her mother, Elizabeth McCann, who was living with them) were born in Dublin. I guess a child raised by two Irish women might pick up an Irish accent to a degree. This will of course be demolished when they're all alive and well in 1891. Watch this space!
Regards, Bridewell.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, I'd have thought so too.
So, either she was named 'Marie Jeanette Kelly' as she told Barnett, or, Wilton had no notion that the family had been traced and the two stories are separate stories just linked in the press?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Debra A View PostMike, I always thought it had been Wilton's choice for the coffin inscription, based on what Barnett had said about Marie Jeanette being her real name, and seeing as he was paying? It sounds to me as if the funeral, coffin, inscriptions etc. were all arranged before the mention of the family being expected.
I thought so too before you posted this clipping. If someone was in touch with the family, it's possible they had the chance to approve or disapprove of the inscription. I mean, even a guy footing the bill would have asked, I think.
Mike
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Good Michael View PostDebs,
It is interesting that the clipping talks of relatives coming and the inscription with Jeanette as the middle name. It seems as if, by the article, that the family would have known about the inscription then... if the article is accurate.
Mike
Leave a comment:
-
Debs,
It is interesting that the clipping talks of relatives coming and the inscription with Jeanette as the middle name. It seems as if, by the article, that the family would have known about the inscription then... if the article is accurate.
Mike
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Scott Nelson View PostThe implication is that the story broke first in the northern counties (where it's reported) because that's the direction by which Kelly's family or friends made their way to London. For some reason the London press may have been been given orders (by police?) to sequester information on the family or friends arrival by the time they reached in London --apparently after her inquest had ended. Thus, the family could cooperate with the police without interference from the London press.
The day after, the 16th, the papers report that the funeral will definitely be Monday and that the family are not expected to attend.
Leave a comment:
-
. . .what I read in the papers . . .
Hello Jon. Thanks.
"if you type "six brothers living" into the Press Reports Search window you'll see a few different versions of that."
Absolutely. But, as I said, if you like newspaper stories . . .
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Scott.
I take it that it would require someone to be expecting the family in London, therefore it was in London where it was first realized that they had not appeared. Hence, the story broke in London.
We cannot trust that the Family was coming from Ireland, they could have been travelling from Wales, so nothing to do with the northern counties.
Regards, Jon S.
Leave a comment:
-
The implication is that the story broke first in the northern counties (where it's reported) because that's the direction by which Kelly's family or friends made their way to London. For some reason the London press may have been been given orders (by police?) to sequester information on the family or friends arrival by the time they reached in London --apparently after her inquest had ended. Thus, the family could cooperate with the police without interference from the London press.Last edited by Scott Nelson; 05-02-2012, 06:59 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Dave. I'll copy and paste the snippet below.
Cheers.
LC
"She said she had one sister, who was respectable, who travelled from market place to market place. This sister was very fond of her. There were six brothers living in London, and one was in the army. One of them was named Henry. I never saw the brothers to my knowledge."
If you type "six brothers living" into the Press Reports Search window you'll see a few different versions of that.
Originally posted by Debra A View PostThe story appears in the London Standard of the same date and has been discussed before, although the friends are not mentioned in that version. The Standard goes on to say the funeral was postponed again because of the family not arriving.
If we do allow for that possibility, then maybe we should stick with Mary/Marie Jane/Jeanette Kelly" as her genuine name as that must have been what the police used in their search, yes?
Very good, thanks, Jon S.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: