Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kellys in the Scots Guards

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Debra A
    replied
    Originally posted by Chris Scott View Post
    Many thanks for this Debs
    Your research work is much appreciated and explores avenues that may well yield results
    Chris
    Thanks Chris.

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Next lot

    7607 Patrick Kelly (deserted)

    This number is linked to Michael Kelly b 1868 in Tralee Tralee, Creiry [Kerry?]
    attested at London 8 July 1887 aged 19 years 10 months
    occupation groom
    deserted 1887 rejoined 1891 discharged 1893?
    educated at Christian Brothers School
    next of kin Susan [no surname] mother 55 High St Tralee Kerry


    6374 Michael Kelly (on 1881 census shown as age 21, born Stirling, Scotland)

    Michael Kelly b 1865 Maycullen Galway, Galway
    attested 26th May 1884 age 19 years 4 months at Hamilton [Lanarkshire]
    discharged 1896
    next of kin father Bryan[?] Kelly 71 Str??field Blantyre [Lanarkshire]


    7623 Robert Kelly (join reserve)

    Robert Kelly b 1864 in troon Ayrshire
    attested 18 July 1887 aged 23 years 3 months at London
    occupation tailor
    imprisoned frequently between 88 and 89
    next of kin John Kelly, father and Marian Rodgers, mother-12 University ?? Glasgow


    7754 Patrick O’Kelly (joined reserve)

    Patrick O'Kelly b 1868 Cork, Cork
    attested 2 Sept. 1887 aged 19 years 4 months at London
    occupation labourer
    discharged in 1899 and rejoined colours 1900 to 1903
    next of kin Timothy Kelly father of Cork
    wife [of Patrick] Julia, 57 Heath Rd Lambeth

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    dates

    Hello Debs. Thanks. 3000 are a bit much.

    Yes, I agree that one could go back a tad before 1885. He may have been there longer.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris Scott
    replied
    Many thanks for this Debs
    Your research work is much appreciated and explores avenues that may well yield results
    Chris

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Debs. A very good idea.

    How many variants are considered? Were there any Kelleys?

    Cheers.
    LC
    Hi Lynn,
    Thanks, I'm just going by Neal's original list for now; men attested 1885-mid 1888 shown on the muster roll.
    Neal's list does include some variants of the name as you can see, so I am sure he thought to look for names such as Kelley etc. as well.

    The pension records are on Find my past if anyone else want to help research this. My sub runs out next month again so I'm trying to look at as many as I can now.
    There were approx. 3,000 men attested to the Scots Guards (all battalions) between 1868 and 1888.

    It would be worth stretching to Kellys attested before 1885 as well at some point, but not later than 88 of course.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    all of them

    Hello (again) Debs. It occurs to me that, given a fairly manageable finite number of 2nd battalion Scots guards, I wonder if those of us who have ancestry could do a search of each one and find connections?

    Do you have an approximate figure?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Kelley

    Hello Debs. A very good idea.

    How many variants are considered? Were there any Kelleys?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Here are my first couple of results [selected details from more extensive records and shown in red] from cross referencing the soldier numbers with the Chelsea pension records:

    6192 James Kelly (discharged)
    Number attached to John Wells discharged from Scots guards in 1876-will re-check later

    6935 James Kelly (joined at 30)
    :James KELLY Year of birth:1864
    Place of birth:St Leonard, Bridgnorth, Shropshire
    Previous service in Cheshire Regiment
    joined Scots Guards 28th Sept. 1885 at Shrewsbury aged 21 years 2 months, a farm labourer.
    discharged from army in 1892 (including reserves)
    Next of kin-mother- Ann Kelly -address-84 Cartway Bridgenorth Shropshire.


    7734 James Kelly
    unable to trace by number-will come back to him

    5857 James Kelly
    This number is linked to William Kelly b 1864 Kildare, Kildare Wicklow
    Attestation date 5 Oct 1883 Scots Guards
    age at attestation 19 years 4 months
    occupation-weaver
    Previously served in 3rd East Lancashire Regiment
    Roman Catholic
    discharged 30th Sept. 1895-12 years service (including reserves)
    next of kin William Kelly 10 Plymouth street Blackburn Lancashire


    5786 Patrick Kelly (joined reserve)

    Patrick Kelly b 1860 in Jonesborough Newry Armagh
    age at attestation 23
    attestation date 17 Aug 1883 Scots Guards
    previous service in Royal irish Rifles
    deserted in 1886 rejoined regiment in 1887
    discharged March 1889
    next of kin brother James [cross after this name and John older written in] living in Jonesborough Armagh

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Here is Neal's original post

    Originally posted by Neal Shelden January 14, 2004
    Last year, in searching for Mary Jane Kelly’s brother in the 2nd Brigade Scots Guards musters records at the PRO, I made this account of all the names and numbers of Kelly‘s and McCarthy‘s and variants. I have also added some notes.

    2nd Brigade Scots Guards musters records - from 1885- to mid 1888.

    6192 James Kelly (discharged)
    6935 James Kelly (joined at 30)
    7734 James Kelly
    5857 James Kelly
    5352 William Kelly (on 1881 census shown as age 27, born Westmeath, IRE)
    5786 Patrick Kelly (joined reserve)
    7607 Patrick Kelly (deserted)
    6374 Michael Kelly (on 1881 census shown as age 21, born Stirling, Scotland)
    7623 Robert Kelly (join reserve)
    7754 Patrick O’Kelly (joined reserve)
    6330 Michael Keily or Kiely (at school , discharged, later to Lance Corporal?)
    5786 P.Keilly (in prison)
    Earlier P.Kelly?
    And M.Kelly (to Dublin Fusiliers)?
    4735 Michael Kelly (from C? Corps to army reserve)
    4751 I failed to write down the name but it would not have been Henry, John, or Johnto? (to army reserve)
    6269 Thomas Kelly (relegated from 40th Green, discharged)
    7421 John Robert Killey (b.May 1867?)
    John Robert Killey discharge certificate said: Born at Ramsey, Isle of Man. Joined 19yrs 9mnths, occupation: sailor, 5ft 8¼ ins, chest 34 ins, fresh complexion, brown hair, grey eyes, recruited at Liverpool on 15th Feb 1887, Royal Artillery gave him notice. Father John, mother Mary, younger brother Thomas. Living: College Street, Ramsey, Isle of Man. Service record: 17th Feb 1887-14th Feb 1899=12 years.
    Continued musters record:
    6347 Charles McCarthy (to army reserve)
    5770 Thomas McCarthy (to army reserve)
    6552 William McCartney?
    Also a Henry McCaskie?

    As we can see from the list there was no Henry, John or Johnto Kelly‘s, or variants, or McCarthy’s, in the muster records for the 2nd Brigade Scots Guards. Maybe Kelly’s brother joined up after mid-1888, but I think it unlikely?
    Therefore, discharge certificates would have to be searched for most of the men above, but I fear that there is little chance that he was one of the above even if we believe her story?
    It may well be that we have to concede that his surname was another name, and that we should look in the records for a different surname with the first names of Henry, John, or Johnto. This would also account for the man only being a lover of Mary Jane Kelly, rather than her brother.

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    started a topic Kellys in the Scots Guards

    Kellys in the Scots Guards

    Copied over from another thread:

    I just found an old post in the archives by Neal Shelden that gives the names and soldier numbers of all men with the surname Kelly or McCarthy in 2nd Battalion Scots Guards from Muster Rolls 1885-mid 1888.
    I just realised that I can use the numbers Neal recorded from these records to check their pension records with fuller details.
    It might draw a blank but worth it for ruling out too I think?....if it works!

    Thanks very much Neal!
Working...
X