story
Hello Mr. Begg. Thanks.
"It's far more likely that he was repeating what Kelly had told him, but one could ask the same question of Kelly - why would she have lied?"
Well, we are taking suggestions as above. What are the usual reasons?
A specific story? Yes, to my puny mind sounds like she has a ready to hand cover story.
Cheers.
LC
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Kellys in the Scots Guards
Collapse
X
-
fear
Hello Trevor. Well, here's another copper with sterling grey cells. Excellent suggestions.
By the way, did not Barnett suggest that Mary was fearful of someone?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bridewell View Post
Another question would follow on: If she was lying about her identity because she didn't want to be found, who found her and how?
Regards, Bridewell.
If not, then surely we have some minutae of truth in her name, how else could he look her up?
Regards, Jon S.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Mr. Begg. But why assume HE originated the lie?
Cheers.
LC
It's far more likely that he was repeating what Kelly had told him, but one could ask the same question of Kelly - why would she have lied? Or, to rephrase that, it's very specific for a lie, and it made an impression of Barnet who was able to state that the Battalion was in Ireland, it having just been moved there. And he said, 'A brother in the 2nd Battalion Scots Guards came to see her once, but beyond that she saw none of her relations, nor did she correspond with them.' This sounds like he was citing personal knowledge rather than something which had happened prior to him meeting Kelly, though it needn't be, of course.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Jon.
"If Mary Kelly was not her real name, then neither was her father John or her brother Henry/John called Kelly. We have no avenue to pursue."
Possibly, but not necessarily. We might begin by asking, "Why would a young girl wish to confuse her identity?"
Cheers.
LC
If she was running away from something or someone
If she didnt want to be found
[/I]
Leave a comment:
-
Can I say
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostOuch, did I just feel a prod with a sharp stick!
Debs, please, I was born at night, but not last night. I only said those news reports are all we have, not that they are the absolute truth!
Meaning..... we are in no position to discredit, change or discard any one of them until something tangible surfaces to demonstrate any one of those stories holds a minutae of truth.
So why do we have to belive. How do we know that things such as these were not lies from the outset when they were given to the press. It annoys me that when anyone challenges these things. All we get back is this ridiculous answer, and we get it back from those who want to automatically belive what they read in the press reports
Because, Debs, we still hold the slender hope of something else she said turning up. But.... if Mary Kelly is not her real name, we are totally dead in the water to research anything she said at all.
If Mary Kelly was not her real name, then neither was her father John or her brother Henry/John called Kelly. We have no avenue to pursue.
Precisely!, so why cook the goose before we've thoroughly plucked it
(careful how you say that)
Best Wishes, Jon S.
Leave a comment:
-
points
Hello Colin.
"Doesn't want to be found for some reason?"
Yes, indeed. What might happen if you ARE found?
"He won't like her if he learns the truth?"
But he didn't like prostitution. If she went back to that line, he seemed aware of it.
"But if so, it would have to be something in her past worse than prostitution."
Now you're talking. Perhaps more dangerous if found out.
"She can't trust him not to reveal the truth - whatever it was?"
Or to let it slip inadvertently.
"Another question would follow on: If she was lying about her identity because she didn't want to be found, who found her and how?"
Now you're talking. Who indeed?
I commend your grey cells, sir!
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Why Lie?
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Stephen. Ah, so we've begun. Super.
Prostitutes? Fair enough. We know a few of her names along that line--Fair Emma, Ginger, etc. But then why fib to Barnett? He already knows her.
Porn star? Maybe not.
Criminal past? Could be.
Keep going? Let's keep a list?
Cheers.
LCWhy lie about her identity:
Why lie to Barnett?
She can't trust him not to reveal the truth - whatever it was?
Another question would follow on: If she was lying about her identity because she didn't want to be found, who found her and how?
Regards, Bridewell.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Debra A View PostBut you are agreeing with the majority of us on this thread, not just Lynn;that MJK lied to Barnett in some way.
There is no Henry Kelly in the Scots Guards in 1888, so she must have lied at least once.
Just for the record
I think her whole life story was a lie and I dont think her real name was Mary Kelly either.
I also dont think her relationship with Barnet was set in stone as some seem to think. Are we to believe that all the time they were supposedly together as an item she never prostitued herself.
Lests face it much of the ripper mystery is centered around lies and deceit either from persons giving false details, to those using aliases, to police officers the list goes on and on.Last edited by Trevor Marriott; 04-22-2012, 01:20 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
lies
Hello Mr. Begg. But why assume HE originated the lie?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
list expands
Hello Stephen. Ah, so we've begun. Super.
Prostitutes? Fair enough. We know a few of her names along that line--Fair Emma, Ginger, etc. But then why fib to Barnett? He already knows her.
Porn star? Maybe not.
Criminal past? Could be.
Keep going? Let's keep a list?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
list
Hello Jon.
"How would you research that Lynn?"
Well, just begin with a list. If something seems sufficiently grave, tick it. Superficial, don't.
You seem to have a fertile mind, so, why would one?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Paul,
Barnett lied? Why not?
What possible reason would he have had for lying that Kelly had a brother in the 2nd Battalion Scots Guards? All the police need have done - what the police may have done, for all we know - is go and ask and the lie would have been quickly and immediately exposed. But even if the police never did that, what purpose would the lie have served?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostWe might begin by asking, "Why would a young girl wish to confuse her identity?"
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Jon.
"If Mary Kelly was not her real name, then neither was her father John or her brother Henry/John called Kelly. We have no avenue to pursue."
Possibly, but not necessarily. We might begin by asking, "Why would a young girl wish to confuse her identity?"
Cheers.
LC
Regards, Jon S.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: