Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why No Stride Mutilations ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Harry D View Post

    Because domestic murders are more common than random ones. There was no clear suspect in either Liz or Kate's murders, and both of their backgrounds were investigated.
    except the ripper- based on sig and MO and a seen suspect wearing a peaked cap at both murder sites.

    and theres nothing nada zilch to implicate kidney in strides murder. Its just trevor ignoring the basic facts again and chasing fairy tales.
    "Is all that we see or seem
    but a dream within a dream?"

    -Edgar Allan Poe


    "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
    quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

    -Frederick G. Abberline

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
      ... But there was three murders that night all of women who had their throats cut...
      Who was the third one, and where? Anyone want to say?

      M.
      (Image of Charles Allen Lechmere is by artist Ashton Guilbeaux. Used by permission. Original art-work for sale.)

      Comment


      • Originally posted by GBinOz View Post

        Your quite right Trevor. Smith's description was of a hard felt deerstalker which looked more like a Fedora than the peaked cloth deerstalker made popular by Sherlock Holmes. The others described a peaked cap.

        Cheers, George
        The odd thing is, there is no such thing as a hard-felt Deerstalker, they are all cloth caps that are folded up to put in a pocket.
        PC Smith's original description, published prior to the inquest, was of a hard felt hat, like a Bowler or a Wideawake type.
        There doesn't seem to be a simple explanation for the change of hat.
        Regards, Jon S.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

          For a start, there is a conflict with his testimony and other witnesses testimony which you clearly havent discovered

          If he had killed her he had every reason to lie thats what guilty people do to cover up their crimes

          www.trevormarriott.co.uk
          But you seem to be arguing that a guilty person just walks into an inquest in front of police, press & public, risking being identified by any of the witnesses, and just pretends to be innocent. Kidney had no idea who was to show up in court, the idea is ridiculous to say the least.
          Regards, Jon S.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Mark J D View Post

            Who was the third one, and where? Anyone want to say?

            M.
            James Brown - an unrelated murder.


            Douglas strongly supports the Double Event theory. He reasons that that two unrelated murders occurring in such close proximity on the same evening would be too much of a coincidence, and therefore that they were both committed by the same hand. So does John Douglas think that John Brown is Jack the Ripper?

            Who is John Brown? Brown murdered his wife Sarah on the evening of September 29, 1888. His deed occurred two hours and three miles from the Double Event. Yet you’ll never hear Brown mentioned as a suspect. And rightfully not—just because he committed a murder on the same evening as two others doesn’t mean he committed all three. Location isn’t always a factor in murders. The only thing linking the Double Event is proximity.

            There may have been more prolific serial killers than the murderer of prostitutes in Whitechapel in 1888, but few have captured the public imagination in


            It's the first story in Evans & Skinner, Ultimate, chapter 7, 2000.
            Regards, Jon S.

            Comment


            • I know as a newbie I'll probably get flamed by more seasoned members especially those with set theories however I do believe the murderer was unsettled (not nessacerrily disrupted) by somebodies coming and goings that night. I'm not sure if Stride was one of JTRs victims, a domestic murder or an act of violence but a couple of points that may or may not have been discussed:
              Liz was

              p

              Comment


              • Oh my.....sorry my digitizer is shot and my phone does random things. Liz was gussied up, wether to meet a date or to attract clientele, it doesn't seem likely she was making pretty for Kidney if they have the type of relationship postulated. As such M Kidney could have spotted her and got jelous, could have demonstrated with her about not giving a percentage of her takings or may have not been anywhere near her...I'm open minded on Stride however I don't know if it has been suggested here that caschouk

                Comment


                • And it did it again.
                  so keeping short.
                  Caschous where not just used to sweeten the breath, but also used to take away nasy tastes.
                  I'm going now before my phone makes up a ripper data profile for me.

                  Helen x

                  Comment


                  • if BS man wasn't Jtr and shouted the lipski comment, where does that leave the GSG (don't need to hear anymore about trevor's makeshift sanitary towels and hair pins thank you)

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Aethelwulf View Post
                      if BS man wasn't Jtr and shouted the lipski comment, where does that leave the GSG (don't need to hear anymore about trevor's makeshift sanitary towels and hair pins thank you)
                      JTR did not write the graffiti will that do you ?

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Wickerman View Post

                        But you seem to be arguing that a guilty person just walks into an inquest in front of police, press & public, risking being identified by any of the witnesses, and just pretends to be innocent. Kidney had no idea who was to show up in court, the idea is ridiculous to say the least.
                        Its not ridiculous someone killed Stride and it was not JTR

                        The witnesses only got brief glimpses of these men seen with Stride and we do not know if either of them were the killer it was dark and so any form of identification would be suspect and we have almost a 15 minute window in which Stride could have met her killer and it need not have been the two seen in close proximity to her. So Kidney should not be ruled out on that basis.

                        You cannot ignore the fact thats his previous history with her shows a propensity towards violence and he might have made sure he wasnt seen so he would not needed have been worried about appearing in court.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

                          JTR did not write the graffiti will that do you ?

                          www.trevormarriott.co.uk
                          Fact or opinion?
                          Regards

                          Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                          “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post

                            except the ripper- based on sig and MO and a seen suspect wearing a peaked cap at both murder sites.
                            Obviously, I meant a named suspect, Abby!

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

                              Its not ridiculous someone killed Stride and it was not JTR
                              True, but that is not what I wrote.

                              The witnesses only got brief glimpses of these men seen with Stride and we do not know if either of them were the killer it was dark and so any form of identification would be suspect and we have almost a 15 minute window in which Stride could have met her killer and it need not have been the two seen in close proximity to her. So Kidney should not be ruled out on that basis.
                              ...and that was not the basis I used either.

                              You cannot ignore the fact thats his previous history with her shows a propensity towards violence and he might have made sure he wasnt seen so he would not needed have been worried about appearing in court.
                              But domestic violence was common place in this period and especially in this part of town. You are implying it was unique enough to make Kidney a suspect, which is not true.

                              Regards, Jon S.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Harry D View Post

                                Obviously, I meant a named suspect, Abby!
                                no i know, i wasnt ragging on you, just pointing out the difference (and agreeing with you, and not trevor)between the domestic who they knew exactly who the killer was and stride and eddowes, who, while they dont know exactly who killed her, knew it was an active serial killer.
                                "Is all that we see or seem
                                but a dream within a dream?"

                                -Edgar Allan Poe


                                "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                                quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

                                -Frederick G. Abberline

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X