Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Schwartz/BS Man situation - My opinion only

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GBinOz
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    The exercise of using my fly-swatter is enough George. I just don’t like trolls.
    Yeah? We'll have that carved on your headstone.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Baron
    replied
    You have been caught with your pants down, crying and screaming Mum Mum please Mum I was kidding I was kidding don't take me seriously, will not help you







    The Baron

    Leave a comment:


  • The Baron
    replied
    Joking huh , not lying ?!



    Mckenzie is irrelevant huh ?!





    The Baron

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
    Herlock....Maate...For the sake of your health I would prescribe that you adopt a "bait" free diet, and spend some time with Sam Gawith instead.

    Cheers, George
    The exercise of using my fly-swatter is enough George. I just don’t like trolls.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post


    One shouldn't expect too much from you at least at this stage, you are excused

    It is important that you don't hurt yourself

    So keep yourself busy and continue practising my advices

    Oh yah, almost forgot, to finish you completely, take those two quotes of you, you insisted to insert your nose in the middle of this


    >> Mackenzie couldn’t have been a ripper victim because Druitt was dead

    >> Mackenzie and Coles are irrelevant unless it can be proven that they were victims of the ripper. And it can’t.


    Now who is the liar?!

    I proved you wrong again!

    It will be difficult for you at first now, but it will get better with time, remember my advices?! Sport,..scocial activities?!






    The Baron

    Seriously?

    The first one was very obviously a joke, the clue is the

    The second is a fact. Mackenzie and Coles cannot be ‘proven’ to have been Ripper victims. Almost no one believes Coles to have been one and only a percentage of Ripperologists believe Mackenzie to have been one. It’s called opinion….it’s not a fact.

    So……you are still proven to be a liar.

    Pathetic. It would have been much easier just to have admitted that you are wrong Baron. By the way, even though posters on here have varying opinions they all have one thing in common. They can all read and so can all see that you have yet again been caught out.



    Leave a comment:


  • The Baron
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    It sums you up in that you don’t mind being a liar.

    One shouldn't expect too much from you at least at this stage, you are excused

    It is important that you don't hurt yourself

    So keep yourself busy and continue practising my advices

    Oh yah, almost forgot, to finish you completely, take those two quotes of you, you insisted to insert your nose in the middle of this


    >> Mackenzie couldn’t have been a ripper victim because Druitt was dead

    >> Mackenzie and Coles are irrelevant unless it can be proven that they were victims of the ripper. And it can’t.


    Now who is the liar?!

    I proved you wrong again!

    It will be difficult for you at first now, but it will get better with time, remember my advices?! Sport,..scocial activities?!






    The Baron

    Leave a comment:


  • GBinOz
    replied
    Herlock....Maate...For the sake of your health I would prescribe that you adopt a "bait" free diet, and spend some time with Sam Gawith instead.

    Cheers, George

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post


    I will give this post a like because you started to learn from me!

    Good for you!


    The Baron
    It sums you up in that you don’t mind being a liar.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Baron
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    What was the word you used? Oh yeah…….GOTCHA!

    I will give this post a like because you started to learn from me!

    Good for you!


    The Baron

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post


    Good! that is a progress!

    Now keep waiting



    The Baron
    No point. You’ve been caught in an obvious lie. What was the word you used? Oh yeah…….GOTCHA!

    Leave a comment:


  • The Baron
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    9 hours this time


    Good! that is a progress!

    Now keep waiting



    The Baron

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post



    Even by your standards that’s a pathetic reply. What are you talking about?

    The issue is not what McNaghten believed. We all know what he believed. No one can dispute what he believed. The ‘issue’ is that you claimed (and have stated it numerous times on this Forum) that I have stated as a fact that Mackenzie wasn’t a victim just to maintain Druitt as a suspect. I’ve explained numerous times that it’s not the case but you keep posting the same lie. We all know why of course.

    ​​​​​​​So that is the point Baron as you well know. I posted several examples proving that I’ve never stated that point as a fact.

    So, I’ll ask again, do you intend to respond to the actual point? I’ll wait again

    ​​​​​​​I wonder what you’ll make up next?


    9 hours this time and no response. Struggling to make something up?

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post


    Oh, you only waited for 2 hours and 36 minutes to post this !!

    I hope you didn't hurt yourself waiting?!

    Take it easy, breath, deep breath, sport, social activities..


    Some of my advices that will help you on the road.



    ​​​​​​​The Baron
    What are those huge creatures in The Lord Of The Rings called again?

    oh yeah…..

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post


    GOTCHA!


    Point me where in my post I mentioned you or even quoted you.

    Do you believe you are the center of the world too?!

    Macnaghten dismissed Mckenzie as a ripper victim, and favoured Druitt as the ripper.

    Why Macnaghten was allowed to dismiss Mckenzie in favour of Druitt and when Michael Richards dismisses other victims he is being criticised?!

    Disscussing with you is meaningless.



    The Baron


    Even by your standards that’s a pathetic reply. What are you talking about?

    The issue is not what McNaghten believed. We all know what he believed. No one can dispute what he believed. The ‘issue’ is that you claimed (and have stated it numerous times on this Forum) that I have stated as a fact that Mackenzie wasn’t a victim just to maintain Druitt as a suspect. I’ve explained numerous times that it’s not the case but you keep posting the same lie. We all know why of course.

    ​​​​​​​So that is the point Baron as you well know. I posted several examples proving that I’ve never stated that point as a fact.

    So, I’ll ask again, do you intend to respond to the actual point? I’ll wait again

    ​​​​​​​I wonder what you’ll make up next?



    Leave a comment:


  • The Baron
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    No response from The Baron I see.

    What a surprise.

    Oh, you only waited for 2 hours and 36 minutes to post this !!

    I hope you didn't hurt yourself waiting?!

    Take it easy, breath, deep breath, sport, social activities..


    Some of my advices that will help you on the road.



    ​​​​​​​The Baron

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X