A Modern Day BS Man/Liz Encounter

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Roy Corduroy
    replied
    what chapter? I don't see it that page.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    reference number

    Hello Roy. Thanks.

    The anti-socialist "hit man" was likely an anarchist himself. (This possibility confused me for some time.)

    Yes, it's in the "Ultimate Companion." In my edition it is pp. 313 & 4. The number I see is "A49301D/1."

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Roy Corduroy
    replied
    Lynn, I understand your theory. That to discredit the club, an agent provocateur killed Liz Stride. An anti-socialist hit man.

    (as opposed to an antisocial personality disorder )

    The Warren memo you've mentioned, is that in the Ultimate? What is the memo? Could you repeat it please and source it for our benefit?

    Roy

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    season's greeting

    Hello Corey. Well, what a problem to have. Ugh!

    Your progression thesis is a venerable one. Good luck with it! And, Merry X-mas! (Well, almost.)

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • corey123
    replied
    Hello Lynn,

    Sporting the bag with the C5 and Marth, I have serious doubts of getting down said chimney.

    Hello Garza,

    I don't believe Bucks-row to be a butched attempt. Actually, I veiw it as the natural progression from Tabram. Cuts to slices. The evolving nature of things. No, I think he set out to do something, and in this case, he accomplished it.
    Last edited by corey123; 12-24-2010, 05:07 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    up on the house top

    Hello Corey. Sure, ho ho ho! Just pop down through the chimney. (heh-heh)

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    mum's the word

    Hello Garza. That's a good answer indeed. Nor, do I think, inherently implausible.

    Quiet for Mrs. Mortimer? To be sure. Perhaps, upon the discovery of the body, they screamed 3 times--but not loudly? (Sorry, couldn't resist.)

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • corey123
    replied
    Hello Lynn, Phil,

    I will try in pop in this discussion later this day, you know how I am.

    Leave a comment:


  • Garza
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Garza. Thanks.

    What is wrong with Diemshitz arriving at just before 1 and having his pony shy, not at Liz's body, but on account of the 3 or 4 club higher ups walking around a dead body and wringing their hands?

    Cheers.
    LC
    That's more possible, though they would have to be quiet with nosy Mrs. Mortimer around the corner.

    Leave a comment:


  • Garza
    replied
    Originally posted by Phil Carter View Post
    Hello Garza,

    only one thing...you said..

    "You are saying that the name Jack the Ripper made people think murders were atrributed to him when they were not. I disagree. They may have been made by different hands, but the name is irrevalent (semantic)."

    Far from it. I am saying that Jack the Ripper..the phenonemon, didnt start until after 30 Sept. I didn't say JTR made people think it.. I am saying that the press and the police made people think it... AFTER 30th Sept. It was the scare that held the weight of opinion amongst the masses.

    best wishes

    Phil
    Quick question Phil, why would the police make people think it was one killer if they had evidence it wasn't? The police thought they had a single killer on the lose, however if from example Liz Stride was found out to be different they most to gain in saying Jack the Ripper did not kill two people that night.

    It would:
    ~ make the public more calm
    ~ make them sound less imcompetant and get the press of their back.

    I do not think the police investigation was guided by press reports. For whatever reason, they believed that one killer was on the loose.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    alternative

    Hello Garza. Thanks.

    What is wrong with Diemshitz arriving at just before 1 and having his pony shy, not at Liz's body, but on account of the 3 or 4 club higher ups walking around a dead body and wringing their hands?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Garza
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Garza. I'm not sure why you refer to Mike Richards. That likely does not contribute to the discussion.

    What is a good point, however, is about synchronous timings. Surely those who took part would get the same time? Indeed. But I am not suggesting that all the remaining members were involved. Spooner, clearly not; the 17 year old Kozebrodski, likely not. (Remember the "balloon" plot from a while back? It was inadvertently "undone" by an unwitting youngster.)

    As for mistaking time, that happens even today. Of course, mistaking times is a knife that cuts both ways. (No pun intended.)

    Cheers.
    LC
    It was just a joke about perrymason, he left before I joined, but I remember he had a thing about times in the Stride murder.

    Not familar with the ballon plot.

    Obviously cuts both ways, but I think my scenario is more likely, due to Liz Stride being seen alive by PC Smith at around 12.40-45, it means Dietschitz would have to come across the body a few minutes after that for 15 mins to work out.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    etc

    Hello Garza.

    "people who favour the domestic theory cling onto it for dear life, because they need Schwartz"

    Yes, and that is a part of my point. If one does NOT accept domesticity, it is well advised to be rid of him.

    By the way, some day, you might explain all the other testimony fitting together--I cannot reconcile a good many parts of it.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Garza
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Garza.

    "That corner was dark."

    But no darker than Dutfield's yard or Buck's Row.

    But I do agree with your overall perspective regarding Liz--IF one believes in Jack the Ripper, and IF one thinks he killed Liz, then BS man needs to be taken out of the equation.

    Cheers.
    LC
    Dutfield's yard and Buck's Row did not have organ removal so data for skill is limited. Buck's row could have been a botched effort, the killer trying and failing to cut though, hence all the cuts - but that can't be definite.

    Its not even proving Liz to be a Ripper victim lynn, Schwartz's testimony does not fit, all the other witnesses fit, schwartz doesn't. Even if Schwartz is proven to be a lair or mistaken, doesn't mean its proven Liz got killed by Jack. But people who favour the domestic theory cling onto it for dear life, because they need Schwartz .

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    kids

    Hello Garza. I'm not sure why you refer to Mike Richards. That likely does not contribute to the discussion.

    What is a good point, however, is about synchronous timings. Surely those who took part would get the same time? Indeed. But I am not suggesting that all the remaining members were involved. Spooner, clearly not; the 17 year old Kozebrodski, likely not. (Remember the "balloon" plot from a while back? It was inadvertently "undone" by an unwitting youngster.)

    As for mistaking time, that happens even today. Of course, mistaking times is a knife that cuts both ways. (No pun intended.)

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X