A Modern Day BS Man/Liz Encounter
Collapse
X
-
reference number
Hello Roy. Thanks.
The anti-socialist "hit man" was likely an anarchist himself. (This possibility confused me for some time.)
Yes, it's in the "Ultimate Companion." In my edition it is pp. 313 & 4. The number I see is "A49301D/1."
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Lynn, I understand your theory. That to discredit the club, an agent provocateur killed Liz Stride. An anti-socialist hit man.
(as opposed to an antisocial personality disorder)
The Warren memo you've mentioned, is that in the Ultimate? What is the memo? Could you repeat it please and source it for our benefit?
Roy
Leave a comment:
-
season's greeting
Hello Corey. Well, what a problem to have. Ugh!
Your progression thesis is a venerable one. Good luck with it! And, Merry X-mas! (Well, almost.)
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Hello Lynn,
Sporting the bag with the C5 and Marth, I have serious doubts of getting down said chimney.
Hello Garza,
I don't believe Bucks-row to be a butched attempt. Actually, I veiw it as the natural progression from Tabram. Cuts to slices. The evolving nature of things. No, I think he set out to do something, and in this case, he accomplished it.Last edited by corey123; 12-24-2010, 05:07 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
up on the house top
Hello Corey. Sure, ho ho ho! Just pop down through the chimney. (heh-heh)
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
mum's the word
Hello Garza. That's a good answer indeed. Nor, do I think, inherently implausible.
Quiet for Mrs. Mortimer? To be sure. Perhaps, upon the discovery of the body, they screamed 3 times--but not loudly? (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Hello Lynn, Phil,
I will try in pop in this discussion later this day, you know how I am.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Garza. Thanks.
What is wrong with Diemshitz arriving at just before 1 and having his pony shy, not at Liz's body, but on account of the 3 or 4 club higher ups walking around a dead body and wringing their hands?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Phil Carter View PostHello Garza,
only one thing...you said..
"You are saying that the name Jack the Ripper made people think murders were atrributed to him when they were not. I disagree. They may have been made by different hands, but the name is irrevalent (semantic)."
Far from it. I am saying that Jack the Ripper..the phenonemon, didnt start until after 30 Sept. I didn't say JTR made people think it.. I am saying that the press and the police made people think it... AFTER 30th Sept. It was the scare that held the weight of opinion amongst the masses.
best wishes
Phil
It would:
~ make the public more calm
~ make them sound less imcompetant and get the press of their back.
I do not think the police investigation was guided by press reports. For whatever reason, they believed that one killer was on the loose.
Leave a comment:
-
alternative
Hello Garza. Thanks.
What is wrong with Diemshitz arriving at just before 1 and having his pony shy, not at Liz's body, but on account of the 3 or 4 club higher ups walking around a dead body and wringing their hands?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Garza. I'm not sure why you refer to Mike Richards. That likely does not contribute to the discussion.
What is a good point, however, is about synchronous timings. Surely those who took part would get the same time? Indeed. But I am not suggesting that all the remaining members were involved. Spooner, clearly not; the 17 year old Kozebrodski, likely not. (Remember the "balloon" plot from a while back? It was inadvertently "undone" by an unwitting youngster.)
As for mistaking time, that happens even today. Of course, mistaking times is a knife that cuts both ways. (No pun intended.)
Cheers.
LC
Not familar with the ballon plot.
Obviously cuts both ways, but I think my scenario is more likely, due to Liz Stride being seen alive by PC Smith at around 12.40-45, it means Dietschitz would have to come across the body a few minutes after that for 15 mins to work out.
Leave a comment:
-
etc
Hello Garza.
"people who favour the domestic theory cling onto it for dear life, because they need Schwartz"
Yes, and that is a part of my point. If one does NOT accept domesticity, it is well advised to be rid of him.
By the way, some day, you might explain all the other testimony fitting together--I cannot reconcile a good many parts of it.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Garza.
"That corner was dark."
But no darker than Dutfield's yard or Buck's Row.
But I do agree with your overall perspective regarding Liz--IF one believes in Jack the Ripper, and IF one thinks he killed Liz, then BS man needs to be taken out of the equation.
Cheers.
LC
Its not even proving Liz to be a Ripper victim lynn, Schwartz's testimony does not fit, all the other witnesses fit, schwartz doesn't. Even if Schwartz is proven to be a lair or mistaken, doesn't mean its proven Liz got killed by Jack. But people who favour the domestic theory cling onto it for dear life, because they need Schwartz.
Leave a comment:
-
kids
Hello Garza. I'm not sure why you refer to Mike Richards. That likely does not contribute to the discussion.
What is a good point, however, is about synchronous timings. Surely those who took part would get the same time? Indeed. But I am not suggesting that all the remaining members were involved. Spooner, clearly not; the 17 year old Kozebrodski, likely not. (Remember the "balloon" plot from a while back? It was inadvertently "undone" by an unwitting youngster.)
As for mistaking time, that happens even today. Of course, mistaking times is a knife that cuts both ways. (No pun intended.)
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: