Is Kosminski still the best suspect we have?

[Herlock Sholmes]

The Baron

Please read the full reply. Do you not know what a typo is?

[Herlock Sholmes]

Then stop pushing Druitt through our noses.



The Baron

Did you go to the Inspector Jacques Clouseau School Of Literacy?

[Herlock Sholmes]

.
In order to make this report fit Druitt, you have to make many hypotheses on too many levels, one of them is that Druitt"s brother killed him!!!

No one has to make that hypothesis. This is something that has been suggested as a possibility. You don’t seem to be able to understand the idea of someone speculating. No one has said that Druitt must have been murdered. Please try and grow up.

And that Kosminski's family doesn't afford a private asylum!!!!

Again, this is a valid point. They wouldn’t have been able to afford a private asylum.

And that He must have been looked away in a private asylum, although the press report said they were looking everywhere not only in private asylums

Yes we know that they didn’t just look in private asylums but the question that a child could understand is…..”WHY WOULD THEY HAVE WASTED TIME LOOKING IN EVEN ONE PRIVATE ASYLUM IF THEY’D KNOWN THAT THEY WERE LOOKING FOR KOSMINSKI AS THEY’D HAVE KNOWN FOR A FACT THAT HIS FAMILY COULDNT HAVE AFFORDED TO HAVE PUT HIM THERE.

And that safe keeping must mean a private asylum

“Private asylum” meant “private asylum?”

Too many hepotheses to even start to consider Druitt a possible fit for just one press report

None have been made. Points have been raised and you’ve replied at your usual standard.

Your obsession with pushing your biased, anti-Druitt nonsense is an embarrassment Baron. Please try and get someone to explain this to,you.

[The Baron]

Memorandums are unreliable, you should know that by now.

Then stop pushing Druitt through our noses.



The Baron

[The Baron]

If there is anyone on this forum I can't trust to answer a post directed at me, it is yourself.

The Baron

[The Baron]

Why would Rob House leave that last sentence off, in his book?
Did he think the same, - that it doesn't really align with his Kozminski suspect?

We have shown how wrong you were on different levels.

Druitt wrote "Since Friday I felt I was going to be like mother, and the best thing for me was to die"

That doesn't set well with a mad person who was incarcerated by force in safe keeping by his own family.


And you admitted it.


End of it.


In order to make this report fit Druitt, you have to make many hypotheses on too many levels, one of them is that Druitt"s brother killed him!!!

And that Kosminski's family doesn't afford a private asylum!!!!

And that He must have been looked away in a private asylum, although the press report said they were looking everywhere not only in private asylums

And that safe keeping must mean a private asylum


Too many hepotheses to even start to consider Druitt a possible fit for just one press report.


Rob House is right, that press report fit Kosminski better than any known suspect.

Your arguments are weak, you lose your case.


You better learn to live with it.



The Baron

[Herlock Sholmes]

Found it…

About John Richardson….

“He also had long hair on his face, one good eye, and suffered Epilepsy.”

And this was after Harry had told you that this was a joke.

[Herlock Sholmes]

And this work of genius


“And you have a rabbit in your house (which is only an assumption) and you want to feed it, you go to the kitchen, open the drawer, and you choose between all the knives there the broken one and no else to cut the carrot (which cannot be fed directly to the rabbit) and you so happened to forget it in your pocket which you usually don't carry there!”

plus this


“Tge rabbit is the key to solve this whole problem.

Feeding a rabbit at 4 am or so ?!”

[Herlock Sholmes]

Or this

“Was there anything at all in the Macnaughten Memorandum that is not wrong?!

I even believe Cutbush is a better suspect than the other three suspects mentioned there.


A classic from someone proposing Kosminski.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Agree, I can't trust him either.

You even got this wrong


The Baron

Ill re-post this from Wick.

“If you could only calm down and analyze your sources rationally, you would see what others see, and you wouldn't be making an ass of yourself on a daily basis”



Perhaps you wouldn’t have fallen for that joke about John Richardson being blind in one eye and having long hair hanging over his eyes.

[Herlock Sholmes]

If there is anyone on this forum I can't trust to answer a post directed at me, it is yourself.
You've actually, as they say, 'taken the words out of my mouth' on other subjects, on other threads, more times that you know.

Cheers Wick

[The Baron]

If there is anyone on this forum I can't trust to answer a post directed at me, it is yourself

Agree, I can't trust him either.



The Baron

[Wickerman]

My apologies to Wick for responding to a post that was aimed at him.

If there is anyone on this forum I can't trust to answer a post directed at me, it is yourself.
You've actually, as they say, 'taken the words out of my mouth' on other subjects, on other threads, more times that you know.

[Wickerman]

How desperate you are Wickerman?! ... only because of this?!

I was looking for a better respond than that, I may have misjudged you.


"after the suspect had been identified at the Seaside Home where he had been sent by us with difficulty in order to subject him to identification, and he knew he was identified. On suspect's return to his brother's house in Whitechapel he was watched by police (City CID) by day & night.

Kosminski was the suspect"

Yes, we know what the Marginalia says, and what Sagar wrote, and Cox, we've known for a couple of decades, yet nothing has changed. No-one has located that Seaside Home, the only viable Home is the one too far away to be accepted, and of course Kozminski didn't die "shortly after" being committed to Colney Hatch.
Swanson should also have known if the suspect was insane (as claimed) he couldn't be charged, therefore he couldn't hang. So, the witness would not have been "the means of (the) murderer being hanged".
Swanson should have known this, but his memory was clearly faltering.

Memorandums are unreliable, you should know that by now.

You have also quoted Sagar yet he tells us the suspect was caged in a private asylum, but by his "friends", whereas Kozminski was committed to a public asylum and by his family.
All the while you turn a blind eye to Sagar's recollection of that piece of apron found under a staircase in Dorset st....
This is your 'reliable' source?

Then of course we have Cox claiming his suspect was committed to an asylum in Surrey, Mile End was not in Surrey, and Colney Hatch was in Barnet, North London. Interestingly, Cox described him as, ..."a mad, poverty stricken inhabitant of some slum in the East End."
Yet Sagar says he was committed to a private asylum, at whose expense?

Your sources don't even offer consistent circumstantial evidence, if Swanson, Sagar & Cox all refer to the same character, their evidence is expected to be consistent.

If you could only calm down and analyze your sources rationally, you would see what others see, and you wouldn't be making an ass of yourself on a daily basis.

[Herlock Sholmes]

I suggest you do your homeworks and don't wait others to do it for you, at least read about Druitt, before you come here declaiming and introducing him as the best suspect that we have.

I own and have read every book on Druitt unlike you. I’m even reading Jon Hainsworth’s updated book at the moment. I can also prove that I own these books. I doubt if you’ve read a single book on Druitt apart from books that make a mere mention of him. In fact I’d doubt that you’ve read many books on the subject of the ripper at all.

I don't always have the time to educate you.

Thats funny If you had time to make this useless post then you had time to answer my very short questions. But you haven’t.

"in 1972, two years before she died, Macnaghten's daughter Christabel, Lady Aberconway, told her friend Michael Thornton that in nominating Druitt her father was "only following the official line. The truth could make the throne totter." Thornton reported this in the Sunday Express in 1992"


The man's own daughter didn't buy the Druitt theory, and she was right!

For Christ’s sake Baron please do something about your understanding of English. This doesn’t mean that she didn’t believe her father. Also, why do you take Michael Thornton as being 100% trustworthy but you believe MacNaghten wasn’t? You are showing your bias by your very selective quoting.

The Baron

Prove to everyone how you can categorically, 100%, without a shadow of doubt show that Druitt wasn’t the ripper.

Prove to everyone how you can categorically, 100%, without a shadow of doubt show that Mackenzie was definitely a victim.

You won’t be able to by the way.

Timewaster.