Originally posted by Monty
View Post
This about sums it up. I don't expect that this thing will stand up to peer review. I mean, it's not an accident that the book comes out before any attempt at independent analysis. Cash in, THEN deal with the scruitiny.
I think that, should the "shawl" prove genuine it could take the study/discussion of the case(s) in some new and interesting directions. If it proves a fraud, well, it's another strange footnote to the history of the 'Jack the Ripper'.
Comment