Why Didn't the Police Have Schwartz and/or Lawende Take a Look at Hutchinson?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fisherman
    Cadet
    • Feb 2008
    • 23676

    #301
    Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
    Last post on Dew (from me). This is his retrospective copper’s hunch concerning the MJK witnesses:

    And if Mrs. Maxwell was mistaken, is it not probable that George Hutchison erred also? This, without reflecting in any way on either witness, is my considered view. I believe that the man of the billycock hat and beard was the last person to enter Marie Kelly's room that night and was her killer. Always assuming that Mrs. Cox ever had seen her with a man.
    As I said before, I find it interesting how Dew seemingly puts little trust in Cox.

    Comment

    • MrBarnett
      *
      • Nov 2013
      • 5672

      #302
      Originally posted by Fisherman View Post
      I reacted to how Gareth spoke of "howlers" on Dews behalf, and I think it is an unfair assessment of his work. As such, it can never be excluded that there are errors in any account, and that goes for what Dew had to ay about Hutchinson too - but what he said is in line with what the papers and Abberline expressed, and it therefore becomes of interest since there are no other assessments of Hutchinson in biographies and such.

      Circumspection - I´m all for it. Dumping - no.

      Yes, Hutch is painted as a plausible witness by the police, and if he was Toppy he doesn’t appear to have been someone who lived an especially chaotic lifestyle. So I have a problem with the idea that he got the day wrong, particularly as Romford Market would have given him a point of reference.

      Comment

      • Batman
        Superintendent
        • Jan 2013
        • 2931

        #303
        Very detailed

        Bona fide canonical and then some.

        Comment

        • MrBarnett
          *
          • Nov 2013
          • 5672

          #304
          Originally posted by Fisherman View Post
          As I said before, I find it interesting how Dew seemingly puts little trust in Cox.
          But what value is there in saying in one sentence that he believes blotchy killed Kelly and then in the next to throw doubt on whether blotchy even existed? It sounds like he was just sucking his pencil and guessing.

          Cox was someone who probably did lead a chaotic lifestyle.

          (At the inquest Cox actually stated that blotchy’s chin was clean shaven. Dew gave him a beard.

          He also calls St Katherine Creechurch, St Katherine Free Church)

          Comment

          • MrBarnett
            *
            • Nov 2013
            • 5672

            #305
            From 2004. Is that the most up to date research on Fleming?

            Comment

            • MrBarnett
              *
              • Nov 2013
              • 5672

              #306
              Originally posted by Fisherman View Post
              Yes, you are.
              Thanks, Fish.

              Presumably he got into that work through his father, possibly working alongside him in his early teens.

              How/when on earth did he become a groom, I wonder?

              Comment

              • Batman
                Superintendent
                • Jan 2013
                • 2931

                #307
                Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
                From 2004. Is that the most up to date research on Fleming?
                I doubt it would be with the magazines that are out there with so many articles, but I can only grab what I can find for now.
                Bona fide canonical and then some.

                Comment

                • Abby Normal
                  Commissioner
                  • Jun 2010
                  • 11939

                  #308
                  Originally posted by Batman View Post
                  The geoprofile also puts Tabram into the picture. I go with Sugden on her inclusion.

                  Barnett doesn't fit here. He is living with Kelly around April through to the start of November, nine days before her murder. Too close.

                  Joseph Fleming meets the criteria much better.

                  Why is there so little about him out there?
                  Flemming does fit that scenario very well.
                  As does hutch.

                  Of course some say he was the same person.
                  "Is all that we see or seem
                  but a dream within a dream?"

                  -Edgar Allan Poe


                  "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                  quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

                  -Frederick G. Abberline

                  Comment

                  • Sam Flynn
                    Casebook Supporter
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 13333

                    #309
                    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
                    Flemming does fit that scenario very well.
                    As does hutch.

                    Of course some say he was the same person.
                    I used to think he could have been, but not any more.
                    Kind regards, Sam Flynn

                    "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

                    Comment

                    • Batman
                      Superintendent
                      • Jan 2013
                      • 2931

                      #310
                      Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
                      I used to think he could have been, but not any more.
                      The important question is if they knew each other. That would be the first thing to look at.
                      Bona fide canonical and then some.

                      Comment

                      • Fisherman
                        Cadet
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 23676

                        #311
                        Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
                        Yes, Hutch is painted as a plausible witness by the police, and if he was Toppy he doesn’t appear to have been someone who lived an especially chaotic lifestyle. So I have a problem with the idea that he got the day wrong, particularly as Romford Market would have given him a point of reference.
                        Once again, Gary - his lifestyle produced the archetypical examples of people who mix up the days.

                        Comment

                        • Fisherman
                          Cadet
                          • Feb 2008
                          • 23676

                          #312
                          Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
                          But what value is there in saying in one sentence that he believes blotchy killed Kelly and then in the next to throw doubt on whether blotchy even existed? It sounds like he was just sucking his pencil and guessing.

                          Cox was someone who probably did lead a chaotic lifestyle.

                          (At the inquest Cox actually stated that blotchy’s chin was clean shaven. Dew gave him a beard.

                          He also calls St Katherine Creechurch, St Katherine Free Church)
                          There is a discrepancy, yes - but given how few men they had to choose from, I think that what Dew means is what he says: IF Blotchy ever existed, then he is the best bet as far as Dew is concerned.
                          Nota bene in this context that if Hutchinsons man ALSO existed, then how on earth could Blotchy be a better bid...?
                          I´ll explain how it works: because Dew accepts - like the rest of the police as per the Echo article Jon posted - that Astrakhan man was very real and that Hutchinson (who he deemed totally honest) had seen him. But NOT on the murder night!

                          Comment

                          • Fisherman
                            Cadet
                            • Feb 2008
                            • 23676

                            #313
                            Originally posted by MrBarnett View Post
                            Thanks, Fish.

                            Presumably he got into that work through his father, possibly working alongside him in his early teens.

                            How/when on earth did he become a groom, I wonder?
                            By doing a runner from his home, where there was some sort of conflict, and trying on another life. The way young people do before they join the ranks.

                            Comment

                            • MrBarnett
                              *
                              • Nov 2013
                              • 5672

                              #314
                              Originally posted by Fisherman View Post
                              Once again, Gary - his lifestyle produced the archetypical examples of people who mix up the days.
                              But we know next to nothing about his lifestyle in 1888 other than that he was unemployed for a short period, lived in one of the more respectable East End lodging houses and hoofed it back from Romford on one occasion.

                              If he went there on the promise of a job or, as a groom, in the hope of some casual work at the livestock market, he’d presumably have had a grasp of the days of the week. He was a young man from a seemingly respectable family who by 1891 was living in respectable lodgings in west London and employed in the trade that his father had followed.

                              Comment

                              • Abby Normal
                                Commissioner
                                • Jun 2010
                                • 11939

                                #315
                                Originally posted by Batman View Post
                                The important question is if they knew each other. That would be the first thing to look at.
                                Hi batman and sam
                                I dont think they were the same person either.

                                But i do beleive they were both staying at the victoria home. As was barnetts brother, so hutch may have known both or at least heard about mary, her murder and or inquest news from them.
                                "Is all that we see or seem
                                but a dream within a dream?"

                                -Edgar Allan Poe


                                "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                                quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

                                -Frederick G. Abberline

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X