Originally posted by MrBarnett
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why Didn't the Police Have Schwartz and/or Lawende Take a Look at Hutchinson?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Fisherman View PostI reacted to how Gareth spoke of "howlers" on Dews behalf, and I think it is an unfair assessment of his work. As such, it can never be excluded that there are errors in any account, and that goes for what Dew had to ay about Hutchinson too - but what he said is in line with what the papers and Abberline expressed, and it therefore becomes of interest since there are no other assessments of Hutchinson in biographies and such.
Circumspection - I´m all for it. Dumping - no.
Yes, Hutch is painted as a plausible witness by the police, and if he was Toppy he doesn’t appear to have been someone who lived an especially chaotic lifestyle. So I have a problem with the idea that he got the day wrong, particularly as Romford Market would have given him a point of reference.
Comment
-
Bona fide canonical and then some.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fisherman View PostAs I said before, I find it interesting how Dew seemingly puts little trust in Cox.
Cox was someone who probably did lead a chaotic lifestyle.
(At the inquest Cox actually stated that blotchy’s chin was clean shaven. Dew gave him a beard.
He also calls St Katherine Creechurch, St Katherine Free Church)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Batman View PostThe geoprofile also puts Tabram into the picture. I go with Sugden on her inclusion.
Barnett doesn't fit here. He is living with Kelly around April through to the start of November, nine days before her murder. Too close.
Joseph Fleming meets the criteria much better.
Why is there so little about him out there?
As does hutch.
Of course some say he was the same person."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View PostYes, Hutch is painted as a plausible witness by the police, and if he was Toppy he doesn’t appear to have been someone who lived an especially chaotic lifestyle. So I have a problem with the idea that he got the day wrong, particularly as Romford Market would have given him a point of reference.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View PostBut what value is there in saying in one sentence that he believes blotchy killed Kelly and then in the next to throw doubt on whether blotchy even existed? It sounds like he was just sucking his pencil and guessing.
Cox was someone who probably did lead a chaotic lifestyle.
(At the inquest Cox actually stated that blotchy’s chin was clean shaven. Dew gave him a beard.
He also calls St Katherine Creechurch, St Katherine Free Church)
Nota bene in this context that if Hutchinsons man ALSO existed, then how on earth could Blotchy be a better bid...?
I´ll explain how it works: because Dew accepts - like the rest of the police as per the Echo article Jon posted - that Astrakhan man was very real and that Hutchinson (who he deemed totally honest) had seen him. But NOT on the murder night!
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrBarnett View PostThanks, Fish.
Presumably he got into that work through his father, possibly working alongside him in his early teens.
How/when on earth did he become a groom, I wonder?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fisherman View PostOnce again, Gary - his lifestyle produced the archetypical examples of people who mix up the days.
If he went there on the promise of a job or, as a groom, in the hope of some casual work at the livestock market, he’d presumably have had a grasp of the days of the week. He was a young man from a seemingly respectable family who by 1891 was living in respectable lodgings in west London and employed in the trade that his father had followed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Batman View PostThe important question is if they knew each other. That would be the first thing to look at.
I dont think they were the same person either.
But i do beleive they were both staying at the victoria home. As was barnetts brother, so hutch may have known both or at least heard about mary, her murder and or inquest news from them."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
Comment