Have Ripperologists Been Polled As To Who They Think Jack Really Was?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Robert,

    "Jack" retired because he had served his purpose.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Malcolm X
    replied
    Originally posted by Robert View Post
    I must say, the idea of 2, 3, 4 or 5 murderers who commit one or more savage murders at the same time, and then retire at the same time, seems a bit bizarre.
    YUP, but also not to kill anywhere else in the world as well, this killer either died, downgraded and thus switched his M.O, or he finished what he set out to do.

    it looks like he achieved his goal and then stopped and downgraded, as well as leaving, because history cant lie about this and as such, this must be a huge clue.

    he seems quite unpopular, but it doesn't half make G.Chapman look as guilty as hell, because he fits exactly what we cant dismiss lightly and what we cant ignore !

    1..... he visits here..... loads of murders
    2..... he is seen too well...... stops, downgrades and leaves
    3......he waits some time, returns to this area and starts killing again, this time with a different M.O

    he is everything that GH isn't, ....i.e what GH should have done after MJK, is everything that G.Chapman did.

    but it's hard to match G.C to these crimes, especially Chapman's simply because this bloke seen is over 40 !..... so it's all a wee bit hit, miss and maybe!

    in fact GC doesn't fit any of these murders, except the last, that is if GH is telling the truth..... SORRY HE AINT, so he fits none of the murders, but neither does Tumblety, D'Onston, Druitt and definitely not KOSMINSKI , so i guess he's no worst than any of the rest
    Last edited by Malcolm X; 12-11-2011, 06:59 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Malcolm X
    replied
    Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
    The difference, if that is what you are looking for, is that Mrs Long saw Chapman's face and recognised her as the woman in the mortuary..

    "I saw the woman's face. Have seen the deceased in the mortuary, and I am sure the woman that I saw in Hanbury-street was the deceased."

    Lawende could not offer the same assurance, he only "thought" the clothes he was shown looked like those which the woman was wearing. And as many of these women dressed in very similar dark attire, Lawende's is not a reliable sighting.

    It is purely personal preference which keeps Lawende's sighting in the forefront.

    Regards, Jon S.
    yes i know and this is a crucial sighting..... over 40 and foreign looking blimey!!!!!

    foreign looking is ok, it's the over 40, i really dont know what to say about this, because i can guarantee you that due to this late/ early hour, that this is definitely her killer, because it would be totally fluke for him to walk off and the real JTR to come along within 5 mins of this...... especially with her saying YES i'll have sex with you !

    this is what could have happened with regards to BROAD SHOULDERS and later on with Eddowes too..... but not her, this suspect is JTR, or another killer

    what about GH ?..... HE'S NOT QUITE CONVINCING ENOUGH, not with this, plus many other niggling doubts too.

    FINALLY, there isn't any other suspect on this website right now that's any good either, they're all ``fall guys`` or non-starters.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    I must say, the idea of 2, 3, 4 or 5 murderers who commit one or more savage murders at the same time, and then retire at the same time, seems a bit bizarre.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi Jon,

    Nicely played.

    Regards,

    Simon
    Thank you, Simon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scorpio
    replied
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi All,

    The reason Jack the Ripper has not been identified is because he didn't exist.

    Which makes a poll somewhat redundant.

    Regards,

    Simon
    Mary Kelly's suicide is the strangest thing that i have ever read about.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Jon,

    Nicely played.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    I can only speak for myself, Simon, I wouldn`t dare to assume their points of view.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Jon,

    Most interesting.

    How do the unenlightened see it?

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Indeed Ruby. Mutilator murderers are extremely rare, especially what our boy was doing. The enlightened see it as some sort of parlour game with smoke and mirrors, copycats and domestics.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rubyretro
    replied
    Jon -I think common sense should tell us that not only were the canonicals
    murdered by the same person, but others of the same period were also by murdered by him.

    I'd definitely include at least Tabram...

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Lynn,

    Kensho would probably be a good first step for Jack's adoring fans.

    I kid you not, but every Friday and Saturday evening there's a food truck in Covina which offers a Buddhist Burger, described on the menu as "One With Everything".

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Guy
    replied
    Originally posted by Monty View Post
    Common sense Jon? That's a concept alien to the fantasist.

    Besides, it doesn't sell.

    Monty
    Absolutely, Neil, absolutely, tee-hee

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    description

    Hello Malcolm. After having read Mrs. Long's description go to Chris Scott's Isenschmid thread and read his description.

    Have you reached satori yet?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Monty,

    Actually, common sense is a concept most alien to Luddites and Flat Earthists.

    Have a safe, warm Christmas and a very happy New Year.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X