writing on the wall

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • milchmanuk
    replied
    and no i am form London !

    Leave a comment:


  • milchmanuk
    replied
    Originally posted by DJA View Post
    He left the organs at 6 Mitre Street.

    GSG and apron drew attention away from there,whilst he made his way to Mary Kelly's room.
    hi
    you say he was making he,s way to Marie home.
    ( i always say this with a sort french accent her full name and dont fully know why - could be fantasy)
    so do you have a suspect in mind you could share with me.

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    He left the organs at 6 Mitre Street.

    GSG and apron drew attention away from there,whilst he made his way to Mary Kelly's room.

    Leave a comment:


  • milchmanuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Parisi North Humber View Post
    Was the notion of Catherine cutting annd destroying her own clothing to use as sanitary protection a serious one?

    Helen x
    hi
    off topic ,
    i thought this with Maddie McCann with the sniffer dogs, in the hotel and the hire car. (sanitary protection) there dogs !
    i am not ex police .
    the cloth could be used as a decoy from the JtR homebound direction.
    a bit risky and elaborate also.?
    but does draw all attention to himself for his own glory.
    i think the cloth was for sexial practice by Jack, and clean-up of himself.
    or as said to carry organs.
    but what then did he do with them
    put them in his pocket!

    Leave a comment:


  • Aethelwulf
    replied
    Originally posted by Parisi North Humber View Post
    Was the notion of Catherine cutting annd destroying her own clothing to use as sanitary protection a serious one?

    Helen x
    yes, it was, from a former murder squad detective no less.

    Leave a comment:


  • Parisi North Humber
    replied
    Was the notion of Catherine cutting annd destroying her own clothing to use as sanitary protection a serious one?

    Helen x

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    Who was Mrs Keemedy ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sunny Delight
    replied
    Originally posted by Wickerman View Post

    Of course, the post that went off-topic was #58 where you commented on my use of Sarah Lewis as a witness. We could fire-up an old thread about Sarah Lewis, or is Bowyer's use of "afternoon" instead of "evening" that you are referring to?
    I have replied on the witnesses board on the topic Mrs Keemedy and Sarah Lewis.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Aethelwulf View Post

    The GSG has always struck me a something written by a local (and what I mean by that is English/first language English) not a foreigner, even one that knew the language well. I wonder if Trevor's desire to discredit the GSG and its apparent (non)connection to the crazy apron/sanitary towel theory is because it is very unlikely a German sailor wrote it. Ditto from hell/kidney and his rogue mortician theory.
    yeah i cant seem to put together trevors feiganbaums the ripper, there was no ripper, there was a ripper but he didnt take away internal organs, and rogue mortician theories.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aethelwulf
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

    If he had wanted to bring attention to the apron piece he could have just sent it to the police with a note attached, Disposing of it where it was found might have resulted in it not being found, and simply treated as an old screwed up piece of rag thereby attracting no attention. The writing cannot be connected to any of the murders and has no significance to any of the murders. So on that basis I conclude that the killer did not write it.

    www.trevormarriott.co.uk
    The GSG has always struck me a something written by a local (and what I mean by that is English/first language English) not a foreigner, even one that knew the language well. I wonder if Trevor's desire to discredit the GSG and its apparent (non)connection to the crazy apron/sanitary towel theory is because it is very unlikely a German sailor wrote it. Ditto from hell/kidney and his rogue mortician theory.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

    If he had wanted to bring attention to the apron piece he could have just sent it to the police with a note attached, Disposing of it where it was found might have resulted in it not being found, and simply treated as an old screwed up piece of rag thereby attracting no attention. The writing cannot be connected to any of the murders and has no significance to any of the murders. So on that basis I conclude that the killer did not write it.

    www.trevormarriott.co.uk
    But it works the other way too Trevor.
    Right next to the entry was an open pit, surrounded by iron railings.
    The railings can be seen here.


    We had the same in our first house. As you can see in the photo the lower window at ground level is bricked up, so was ours. But my point here is that the pit is something like 4-5 ft deep, and likely collects whatever rubbish blows around. The organs may have been down in that pit, we have no mention of the police searching it. At the time the police theory seems to have been that the rag was only used to wipe his hands, so no police bothered to look for spilled organs.

    If, the killer was carrying the organs in the piece of apron, as I always believed, and threw the bundle at the doorway as he ran passed, they may have spilled out as the bundle hit the wall/archway and ended up down in that hole.
    It was not planted, it wasn't intentional, the bundle was thrown away into the doorway, in desperation as he may have seen an officer coming up the street. The fact there was some graffiti close by was irrelevant.
    Last edited by Wickerman; 07-01-2022, 12:33 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • milchmanuk
    replied
    i was just reading and a author wrote why did he not write next to a body,.
    perhaps he was also carrying he,s shoes !
    a local lad would grow up bear footed .
    and a kit with organs in the other hand.

    Leave a comment:


  • C. F. Leon
    replied
    One of the old RipperCast episodes talked about handwriting (?the one on the Ripper Letters) and it was mentioned that in this period, the pupils were encouraged to copy the template as closely as they could- the intent being almost as close to a Xerox as possible. So a distinct lettering style, such as a "D" with a particular looping, is more likely to be more "Prof. Higgins' style", rather than Master Druitt's or Master Hutchinson's own. And some of these teachers might have influenced 20 or 30 years of little calligraphers practicing their resumes or letters to The Times claiming to be JtR.
    Last edited by C. F. Leon; 06-30-2022, 10:52 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by Sunny Delight View Post

    To be fair this is way off topic. Is there anywhere we can continue this where it is more appropriate?
    Of course, the post that went off-topic was #58 where you commented on my use of Sarah Lewis as a witness. We could fire-up an old thread about Sarah Lewis, or is Bowyer's use of "afternoon" instead of "evening" that you are referring to?

    Leave a comment:


  • milchmanuk
    replied
    if jack did write "the writing on the wall "
    he could be saying i am a jew and God will not blame us,
    i believe the Torah is five books behind a veil .
    like conical five ?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X