If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I was only made aware of this image a few years back, and the railings were new to me.
It certainly changes the scene from ones amagination of the crime scenes.
It makes even more sense that the rag was left to be found.
But if it wasnt meant to be found and just dropped / disposed by the killer without much thought, I would amagin there was a good chance the killer lived there.
I know that apparently the police did some door to door enquiries, but we dont really know how thorough.
It seemed just abit going as "through the motions".
was the railings there at the time of the find or are they new addition at a later date.
But it works the other way too Trevor.
Right next to the entry was an open pit, surrounded by iron railings.
The railings can be seen here.
We had the same in our first house. As you can see in the photo the lower window at ground level is bricked up, so was ours. But my point here is that the pit is something like 4-5 ft deep, and likely collects whatever rubbish blows around. The organs may have been down in that pit, we have no mention of the police searching it. At the time the police theory seems to have been that the rag was only used to wipe his hands, so no police bothered to look for spilled organs.
If, the killer was carrying the organs in the piece of apron, as I always believed, and threw the bundle at the doorway as he ran passed, they may have spilled out as the bundle hit the wall/archway and ended up down in that hole.
It was not planted, it wasn't intentional, the bundle was thrown away into the doorway, in desperation as he may have seen an officer coming up the street. The fact there was some graffiti close by was irrelevant.
I was only made aware of this image a few years back, and the railings were new to me.
It certainly changes the scene from ones amagination of the crime scenes.
It makes even more sense that the rag was left to be found.
But if it wasnt meant to be found and just dropped / disposed by the killer without much thought, I would amagin there was a good chance the killer lived there.
I know that apparently the police did some door to door enquiries, but we dont really know how thorough.
It seemed just abit going as "through the motions".
Sutton had been given Mary Kelly's address by Eddowes just before he murdered her.
He was going to make it a Triple Event,however he had to wait until Barnett moved out.
Sutton had been given Mary Kelly's address by Eddowes just before he murdered her.
He was going to make it a Triple Event,however he had to wait until Barnett moved out.
so P.C. Alfred Long must of used his bull lamp to of found the apron piece and graffiti,
jack not noticed as he was frequently seen walking these routes to and from work as local ? perhaps
'The Jews are not the men that will be blamed for nothing'?
written in three lines.
perhaps as this
"the jewes are not the men"
"is to blamed"
"for nothing"
so the Ladies' are to blame not the men.
for nothing but jolly.
Sutton had been given Mary Kelly's address by Eddowes just before he murdered her.
He was going to make it a Triple Event,however he had to wait until Barnett moved out.
hi
you say he was making he,s way to Marie home.
( i always say this with a sort french accent her full name and dont fully know why - could be fantasy)
so do you have a suspect in mind you could share with me.
Leave a comment: